Preparing for Child Welfare Practice: Themes, a Cognitive-Affective Model, and Implications from a Qualitative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ericka Deglau ◽  
Anasuya Ray ◽  
Richard L. Edwards ◽  
Nancy Carre-Lee ◽  
Talisah Harrison ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 002087281989943
Author(s):  
Maria Belen Ortega-Senet ◽  
Veronica Gómez Fernández ◽  
Elyse M Tierney

This article presents the results obtained in a qualitative study based on the experiences of professionals from two Chilean projects addressing Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC). Methodologically, this study consisted of semi-structured interviews of professionals paired with a group participation-based approach. Participants identified critical knots that stemmed from the difficulty or complexity of CSEC itself, and from the limitations and contradictions of the national child welfare and judicial systems. These points of contradiction produce ethical and emotional tensions, which the professional resolves using accommodations as well as resistances based on the Focus on Rights within these same systems.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104420732110063
Author(s):  
Sasha M. Albert ◽  
Robyn M. Powell ◽  
Jack Rubinstein

Parents with disabilities experience discrimination within the child welfare, family law, and adoption and foster care systems. In response, there have been increasing calls for states to pass legislation prohibiting discrimination against parents with disabilities, and as of 2020, 28 states have passed or are considering such legislation. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of 19 advocates, attorneys, and legislators on barriers and solutions for passing legislation to protect the rights of parents with disabilities. Participants identified three barriers: (a) legislators’ pejorative attitudes toward parents with disabilities, (b) external opposition, and (c) legislative barriers. Participants also identified eight solutions: (a) cross-disability advocacy, (b) education, (c) relationship-building, (d) bipartisanship, (e) support from state and national organizations, (f) strong sponsors, (g) incrementalism, and (h) model legislation. Study findings should help to inform ongoing legislative advocacy to protect the rights of parents with disabilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document