Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch (1999), ‘The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations’, in Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch (eds), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 3-43

Abortion ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 495-536
Author(s):  
Sharon K. Stortz ◽  
Sheila Mulligan ◽  
Marie Snipes ◽  
Catriona Hippman ◽  
Nirupama Nini Shridhar ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to assess the use of a standardized prenatal genetic testing educational video and its effects on patient uptake of prenatal testing, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and decisional regret. Study Design This was an IRB-approved randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to intervention (standardized video education) or control (no video education). The video education group viewed a 5-minute educational video on genetic testing options, and the control group did not review the video. Both groups answered validated questionnaires to assess maternal knowledge (Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire [MSSK]), conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale [DCS]), and regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS]). The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake; secondary outcomes were knowledge-based test score, and level of decisional conflict and regret. Results We enrolled 210 patients between 2016 and 2020, with 208 patients randomized, 103 patients in the video education group and 105 patients in the control group. Four patients were excluded from the video education group for missing data. Video education was associated with a 39% lower chance of prenatal testing compared with patients who did not receive video education, (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.92). Patients in the video education group had higher mean MSSKQ scores by 2.9 points (8.5 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Conflict Scores by 7.3 points (31.5 vs. 38.8, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Regret Scores by 5.4 points (23.8 vs. 29.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion We found that video education on prenatal genetic testing improved patients' knowledge, decreased testing and decisional conflict and regret regarding testing. This may indicate improved understanding of testing options and more informed decisions that align with their personal values and beliefs. This standardized video can be easily implemented in clinical practice to increase patient understanding and support decisions that align with patient's values. Key Points


1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Allen Furr ◽  
Rachelle E. Seger

The purpose of the study was to identify psychosocial predictors of interest in prenatal genetic testing. Analysis of data from 886 responses in the 1996 Louisville Metropolitan Survey indicate that factors such as demographic characteristics and scores on health locus of control that predict utilization of other preventive health care are less applicable to predicting attitudes toward genetic testing. Regression analyses indicated that political orientation, identification with religion, and attitudes against abortion predicted less favorable responses to a question about prenatal genetic testing. Abortion attitudes were particularly strong indicators of respondents' stated interests in testing. The findings have practical implications in terms of promoting preventive health care. Personal values may lead individuals to believe that prenatal testing leads to the intention of abortion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document