Effect of Shared Decision-making on Decisional Conflict and Uptake of First-trimester Screening Tests

Introduction: Several factors influence women’s decision to take First Trimester Screening (FTS) tests. These factors are associated with the ambivalence of women toward undergoing screening tests. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) about undergoing FTS on Decisional Conflict (DC) immediately after consultation and uptake of FTS. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 200 pregnant women (100 women in the intervention and 100 in the control groups) referred to health centers for prenatal care in 2019. They were selected by the block randomization sampling method. The control group received the routine care and the intervention group, in addition to routine care, attended a 90-min long consultation session based on SDM. The women were contacted via phone at 14 weeks of pregnancy to collect data on their undertaking prenatal screening tests. The demographic characteristics form and O’Conner’s decisional conflict scale were filled out immediately after the consultation session for the intervention group. The obtained data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Fisher exact-test, Mann-Whitney U, and linear regression tests. The P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding women’s demographic characteristics, except for education level, job, and insurance coverage. The Mean±SD DC score was significantly lower in the intervention group (7.35±8.55) compared to the control group (27.32±13.81) (95%CI; 16.80-24.19, P=0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of undergoing the offered FTS (P=0.04). The DC scores ≥25 were associated with a decreased chance of undergoing FTS (P=0.02). Women were less likely to undergo FTS when they were self-employed (OR=0.15, 95%CI; 0.03-0.71, P=0.01). Conclusion: The SDM consultation can help women experience significantly lower levels of DC. Furthermore, factors such as self-employment can prevent women from undergoing FTS despite lower levels of DC.

Mobile Audio Recording Technology to Promote Informed Decision Making in Advanced Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer increasingly encounter complex treatment decisions. Consultation audio recordings and summaries promote patient informed decision making but are underutilized. Mobile recording software applications may increase access. Little is known regarding the feasibility of implementation in clinical encounters. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study in men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We instructed patients to use a mobile software application to record an oncology visit. Patients could share the recording with our patient scribing program to receive a written summary. We assessed feasibility and acceptability with postvisit surveys. We measured patient-reported helpfulness of the intervention in decision making and change in Decisional Conflict Scale–informed subscale. We conducted semistructured interviews to explore implementation and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS Across 20 patients, 18 (90%) recorded their visits. Thirteen of 18 (72%) listened to the recording, and 14 of 18 (78%) received a summary. Eighteen of 20 (90%) visits were telehealth. Fourteen patients (70% of all 20; 78% of 18 question respondents) found the application easy to use. Nine patients (50% of 18 recording patients; 90% of 10 question respondents) reported that the recording helped treatment decision making. Decisional conflict decreased from baseline to 1-week postvisit (47.4-28.5, P < .001). Interviews revealed benefits, facilitators, contextual factors, and technology and patient-related barriers to recordings and summaries. CONCLUSION In this single-institution academic setting, a mobile application for patients to record consultations was a feasible, acceptable, and potentially valued intervention that improved decision making in the telehealth setting. Studies in larger, diverse populations are needed.

Exploring Collaboration Enjoyment and Decisional Uncertainty: Actor-Partner Effects in Advanced Care Planning

Caregivers are often engaged in decision making with and for patients. However, the role of patient-caregiver interpersonal processes on decisions about advance care planning (ACP) are not well known. This secondary data analysis examined the effects of patient-caregiver enjoyment about collaboration regarding choices for life-sustaining treatment on patients’ and caregivers’ decisional uncertainty following a dyadic ACP intervention. A purposive sample of 18 adult home health patients and their informal caregivers (N=36) participated in a one-group pretest posttest study. The Interpersonal Enjoyment subscale of the Perceptions of Collaboration Questionnaire and the Decisional Uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale were administered using parallel questionnaires. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was used to examine actor and partner effects of patients and caregivers’ interpersonal enjoyment on their uncertainty in decisions about ACP before and after the intervention. The mean age was 68.2±9.6 years for patients and 61.3±13.6 years for caregivers. The majority of patients (61.1%) and caregivers (72.2%) were female and married (55.6% and 66.7%, respectively). Almost all were non-Hispanic White (97.0%). Patients’ and caregivers’ interpersonal enjoyment and uncertainty scores were similar before the intervention. A significant partner effect between greater interpersonal enjoyment among caregivers at pretest and greater patient uncertainty at posttest (β=0.44, p=.037) was found. Previous analyses found that overall patients improved in decisional uncertainty at posttest. However, these findings suggest that for some dyads, interpersonal factors can negatively affect patients’ decisional certainty. Future research is needed to verify this finding with a larger sample.

Adaptação transcultural e validação da Decisional Conflict Scale para utilização no Brasil

Objetivo: Realizar a adaptação transcultural e avaliação das propriedades psicométricas da Decisional Conflict Scale para o português do Brasil. Métodos: Estudo metodológico de adaptação transcultural. Seguiu cinco etapas: tradução, síntese, tradução reversa, avaliação por comitê de especialistas e validação com 190 estudantes de enfermagem. A validade de constructo foi verificada por meio da análise fatorial exploratória, adotando-se a estatística de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, e as análises Screeplot e Engevalues. Utilizado o Alpha de Cronbach para avaliar a confiabilidade interna das subescalas. Resultados: O Coeficiente de Validade de Conteúdo dos itens alcançou concordância de 0,79. A estatística de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin com resultado de 0,91, adequados a próxima etapa. A análise Screeplot apresentou distribuição de dois fatores, confirmada pela análise Engevalues. Análise Fatorial Exploratória revelou duas subescalas: a primeira Decisão, Incerteza e Suporte e a segunda Informação e Clareza de Valores, com coeficientes de Alpha de Cronbach 0,88 e 0,89. Conclusão: A versão em português do Brasil da Decisional Conflict Scale, Escala de Conflito na Tomada de Decisão, apresentou duas subescalas com adequadas evidências de validade e confiabilidade possibilitando identificar os fatores que influenciam no conflito de decisão no processo saúde-doença.

Decision aid and cost compensation influence uptake of PSA-based early detection without affecting decisional conflict: a cluster randomised trial

International guidelines recommend to inform men about the benefits and harms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) based early detection of prostate cancer. This study investigates the influence of a transactional decision aid (DA) or cost compensation (CC) for a PSA test on the decisional behaviour of men. Prospective, cluster-randomised trial to compare two interventions in a 2 × 2 factorial design: DA versus counselling as usual, and CC versus noCC for PSA-testing. 90 cluster-randomised physicians in the administrative district of Muenster, Germany recruited 962 participants aged 55–69 yrs. in 2018. Primary endpoint: the influence of the DA and CC on the decisional conflict. Secondary endpoints: factors which altered the involvement of the men regarding their decision to take a PSA-test. The primary endpoint was analysed by a multivariate regression model. The choice to take the PSA test was increased by CC and reduced by the DA, the latter also reduced PSA uptake in men who were offered CC. The DA led to an increase of the median knowledge about early detection, changed willingness to perform a PSA test without increasing the level of shared decision, giving participants a stronger feeling of having made the decision by themselves. The DA did not alter the decisional conflict, as it was very low in all study groups. DA reduced and CC increased the PSA uptake. The DA seemed to have a greater impact on the participants than CC, as it led to fewer PSA tests even if CC was granted.Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00007687). Registered: 06/05/2015. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00007687.

Telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk: Patient predictors of differential outcomes

Purpose Telegenetics has become the predominant mode of cancer genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to identify potential patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic genetic counseling. Methods We analyzed post-counseling (pre-result disclosure) follow-up data from a randomized noninferiority trial of a telephone genetic counseling versus usual care genetic counseling. Among 669 randomized participants, 600 completed pre-test counseling and 568 completed a 2-week follow-up assessment before receiving test results. In this analysis, we focused on genetic counseling outcomes (knowledge, decisional conflict, and distress). In multivariate models controlling for bivariate predictors of these outcomes, we tested our a priori hypotheses that pre-counseling numeracy, perceived stress, and race/ethnicity would moderate the outcomes of telephone genetic counseling versus usual care. Results Only numeracy significantly moderated associations between mode of genetic counseling and outcomes. Higher numeracy was associated with higher post-counseling knowledge following telephone genetic counseling ( p < 0.001), but not usual care ( p = 0.450). Higher numeracy was also associated with lower distress following telephone genetic counseling ( p = 0.009) but not usual care ( p = 0.16). Neither perceived stress nor race/ethnicity exhibited differential impacts on telephone genetic counseling versus usual care ( ps > 0.20). Conclusion Although high numeracy was associated with higher levels of knowledge following telegenetic counseling, we did not identify any clinically significant patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic counseling. These results lend further confidence to the broad use of telegenetics.