Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: differences by participant role

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlien Demol ◽  
Karine Verschueren ◽  
Christina Salmivalli ◽  
Hilde Colpin

Teachers’ responses to bullying incidents are key in bullying intervention at school. Scholars have suggested that teacher responses can predict student cognitions that are associated with their bullying behaviors. However, little is known about whether and how teacher responses affect these cognitions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effects of four immediate teacher responses on four bullying-related student cognitions, using an experimental vignette design. Additionally, it was examined whether students’ own participant role behaviors in actual bullying moderated these effects. The investigated teacher responses were non-response, comforting the victim, correcting the bully, and a combination of comforting the victim and correcting the bully. The investigated student cognitions were perceived teacher attitudes toward bullying, perceived teacher moral disengagement regarding bullying, student willingness to report bullying to the teacher and student expectations regarding bullying participant role behaviors in the classroom. Fourth-to-sixth grade students (N = 910; 47% boys; Mage = 11.04 years, SD = 0.91) read a vignette describing a hypothetical teacher’s response to a same bullying incident, following random assignment to one of eight conditions (i.e., four teacher responses × two genders of bully and victim in the vignette). Afterward, students completed questionnaires about their social cognitions and manipulation checks. ANOVA demonstrated that students perceived stronger teacher anti-bullying attitudes and less teacher moral disengagement when the hypothetical teacher displayed an active response. These effects were even stronger when the teacher corrected the bully compared to when only the victim was comforted. Further, students were more willing to report bullying when the teacher corrected the bully than when the teacher only comforted the victim. Finally, students expected less pro-bullying behaviors, more defending and less victimization in the vignette’s classroom following active teacher response compared to non-response. The effects of teacher responses on student cognitions were not moderated by students’ own participant roles in bullying. Taken together, these findings emphasize the importance of active teacher responses to bullying, and especially, responses that clearly show that bullying is not tolerated. Teachers are encouraged to be aware that students can deduce beliefs from teacher responses which can, in turn, affect bullying processes in the classroom.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Yayah Durrotul Gholiyah ◽  
◽  
H. Fuad Nashori ◽  
Raden Rachmy Diana ◽  

This study aims to illustrate the effect of empathy on the role of the bystander towards bullying at school through moral disengagement as the mediator. Moral disengagement affects bystanders' role. In this case, an outsider or ignorant bystander indicates higher moral disengagement than a defender or defensive bystander. The subject were 245 high school students in the age of 15-17 years. The respondents acted as bystanders adapted from the Participant Role Questionnaire (PRQ) scale.  The researcher adopted the Basic Empathy Scale dan Moral Disengagement Scale as the measuring instrument. The data analysis employed a simple mediation analysis technique with bootstrapping method. The results indicated that first, there was a positive and significant effect of empathy on the role of defender bystander mediated by moral disengagement. Second, there was a negative and significant effect of empathy on reinforcer bystander's role towards bullying at schools as mediated by moral disengagement. Third, the study also indicated that there was no effect of empathy to the bystander's roles as an assistant, outsider, and aggressive defender through moral disengagement as a mediator. One of implications for future interventions in schools, for instance, bystander training emphasizing an effective way to act towards bullying at school.


Author(s):  
Mariana Barbosa ◽  
Carla Machado ◽  
Raquel Matos ◽  
Mi-Sung Kim ◽  
Ting Wu

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanvi Zaveri ◽  
Michael Toohey ◽  
Michael J. Stevens ◽  
Eros Desouza ◽  
Rouba Youssef ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mel Win Khaw ◽  
Michael S. Christian ◽  
Jerel E. Slaughter

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen R. Gutowski ◽  
Ross Caputi ◽  
Candace Cantrell ◽  
Kathleen Malley-Morrison
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Y. Chan ◽  
Annis Lai Chu Fung ◽  
Manisha Rustagi ◽  
Courtney M. Ryan ◽  
Scott E. Bischoff
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document