Measuring impact in social entrepreneurship: developing a research agenda for the ‘practice turn’ in impact assessment

Author(s):  
Jarrod Ormiston ◽  
Erin Castellas
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 11196
Author(s):  
Manuel R. Montoya ◽  
Audriana Stark ◽  
Wellington Spetic

Author(s):  
Jane Lê ◽  
Rebecca Bednarek

This chapter explores the shared ontological basis of the paradox and practices perspectives to advance the emerging “practice turn” in paradox. The authors outline the practice-theoretical approach to studying paradox by articulating four main principles that define its research agenda. These principles are social construction, everyday activity, consequentiality, and relationality. They describe each theoretical principle, explain its implications for the way paradox is understood and studied, and illustrate it with an example of existing work. Finally, they use these principles to reflect on the potential of a practice-based view of paradox, highlighting avenues for future research. Herein the authors review, integrate, and develop a foundation for practice-based studies of paradox.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 209-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parul Gupta ◽  
Sumedha Chauhan ◽  
Justin Paul ◽  
M.P. Jaiswal

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanchita Bansal ◽  
Isha Garg ◽  
Gagan Sharma

Social entrepreneurship has been recognized as a tool to attain sustainable development. This paper highlights the role of social entrepreneurship in triggering social change and attaining sustainable development. The paper contributes significantly to the existing literature by conducting a systematic review of extant works. To this end, we analyzed and reviewed 173 research papers from the Web of Science database. The results are presented in the form of descriptive findings and thematic discussion. The paper concludes by setting up the agenda for future researchers in the field.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Kacey Beddoes ◽  
Devlin Montfort ◽  
Shane Brown

This article presents a practice-based framework for personal epistemology (PE) research that advances recent efforts to broaden personal epistemology research. The framework accounts for empirical experiences and also contributes to on-going theoretical efforts to expand personal epistemology research. Building on the “practice turn” that other fields have taken and learned from, the purpose of this article is four-fold. First, it offers a conceptual framework that addresses theoretical and empirical limitations of personal epistemology as it is currently studied. Second, it advances PE research by highlighting the importance of heretofore ignored facets of PE, namely communities of practice, context, epistemic practices, and identity. Third, it advances PE research by adding to on-going conversations about the interrelatedness of dimensions of personal epistemologies. Fourth, it lays out a research agenda for personal epistemology research and concomitant methodological considerations, which have not yet received significant attention from PE researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document