Circularity in the built environment: a call for a paradigm shift

2020 ◽  
pp. 425-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tove Malmqvist ◽  
Alice Moncaster ◽  
Freja Rasmussen ◽  
Harpa Birgisdóttir
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-53
Author(s):  
Anna Marazuela Kim

While creative placemaking has proved a long-standing paradigm for the arts in city-making strategy, recently there has been a shift towards a cultural infrastructure approach. This article takes critical stock of this paradigm shift, to engage the broader question of whether we can design for culture in the built environment. Conceptualizing creative placemaking within a larger genealogical framework, I argue that this shift might be understood as responsive to some of the limitations and unintended social consequences of the movement: its temporal nature and contribution to cycles of gentrification and displacement.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Loy ◽  
Tim Schork

This chapter describes how digital immersion, changing social values, and environmental and economic pressures have the potential to create a paradigm shift in relationships between people and their built environment with the growing sustainability imperative. It responds to emerging opportunities provided by digital technologies for the construction, maintenance, and heritage curation of the life of buildings, and draws on aligned changes in thinking apparent in manufacturing, healthcare, business, and education in the 21st century. The ideas that shape this chapter are relevant to architects and educators, but also to scholars and practitioners across disciplines because they provide an innovative approach in responding to the types of changes currently impacting societies worldwide.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Sharon Gordon

We share this world with millions of other species. While humans have claimed and transformed vast territories of the planet, our homogenized environments show little regard for the countless birds, mammals, and other creatures that move through these urban jungles. The relationship between culture and nature is ever evolving, and where it goes next is a question at the forefront of architectural discourse. This thesis sets out to explore how architecture can respond to the socio-ecological tensions between wildlife and the built environment. The research identifies a subset of biological subjects that inform a design process which aims to resynchronize architecture with ecological dynamics. The thesis culminates with a proposal for a hybrid eco-cultural hub which celebrates biodiversity and promotes an emerging paradigm shift; it is a step toward redefining humanity as a keystone species – one whose design interventions are aligned with other subjects with whom we share the ecosystem.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 50

The focus of this paper deals with innovative material and construction systems that incorporate nanotechnologies for improving their energy-saving performance. Recent developments in the world of phase change materials, specifically on organic PCMs, such as paraffin and bio-PCM aerogel, are presented; laboratory works are presented together with pilot projects in Toronto, where PCM-based system have been incorporated in high-performing buildings. Then, the paper shows recent advancements in super-insulating materials, specifically focusing on aerogel-enhanced blankets and panels, which have been developed at the BeTOP laboratory of the Ryerson University in Toronto, Ontario. Finally, the paper explores the potentialities of including innovative thermochromic coatings at the urban scale and shows the mutual benefits between buildings and communities that could be obtained through the adoption of previously mentioned nanotechnologies. The goal is to describe a pathway towards more sustainable and resilient communities. Using Toronto as a test case, the paper aims to comprehensively show that nanotechnologies offer a paradigm shift at the different scales of the built environment.


Author(s):  
Michael Ulrich Hensel

This paper introduces and elaborates a specific approach to architectural design entitled ‘performance-oriented architecture’ based on a redefinition of the concept of ‘performance’ in relation to the discipline of architecture and set within a biological paradigm. The concept of ‘performance’ evolved out of a series of intellectual efforts that had broad consequences, brining about a paradigm shift in the humanities referred to as the ‘performative turn’. These efforts commenced in the 1940s and 1950s and had significant impact also on the sciences, deriving what is referred to as the ‘performative idiom’. Here the question is raised as to what ‘performance’ in the context of architecture may entail. The approach introduced con­trasts previous ones that focused either on questions of representation and meaning in architecture, or, alternatively that have treated performance as synonymous to function placed in the context of post-design functional optimisation. Contrasting these previous efforts performance is here reformulated as a driving concept for design that helps re-con­solidate form and function into a synergetic relation with the dynamics of natural, cultural and social environments, and in so doing, locate performative capacity - ‘ active agency’ -  in  the spatial and material organisation of architecture, in the human subject and the environ­ment through the dynamic interaction between these four domains. In pursuing this approach the potential of a close disciplinary affiliation between architecture and biology is examined, so as to locate a suitable paradigm for performance in the discipline of biology and its var­ious sub-disciplines, in its various foci and modes of inquiry, and, moreover, in biological syst­ems.


1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Marion Perlmutter
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-198
Author(s):  
Raymond T. Garza
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document