Capital flows, the role of non-financial corporations and their macroeconomic implications: an analysis of the case of Chile

Author(s):  
Esteban Pérez-Caldentey ◽  
Nicole Favreau-Negront
2020 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Kosmidou ◽  
Dimitrios Kousenidis ◽  
Anestis Ladas ◽  
Christos Negkakis

2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 170-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoo Kikuchi ◽  
John Stachurski ◽  
George Vachadze

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-154
Author(s):  
Michael Richter ◽  
Johannes-Gabriel Werner

FEDS Notes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2998) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Bertaut ◽  
◽  
Bastian von Beschwitz ◽  
Stephanie Curcuru ◽  
◽  
...  

For most of the last century, the preeminent role of the U.S. dollar in the global economy has been supported by the size and strength of the U.S. economy, its stability and openness to trade and capital flows, and strong property rights and the rule of law. As a result, the depth and liquidity of U.S. financial markets is unmatched, and there is a large supply of extremely safe dollar-denominated assets.


2016 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 1497-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Broner ◽  
Jaume Ventura

Abstract During the past three decades, many countries have lifted restrictions on cross-border financial transactions. We present a simple model that can account for the observed effects of financial globalization. The model emphasizes the role of imperfect enforcement of domestic debts and the interactions between domestic and foreign debts. Financial globalization can lead to a variety of outcomes: (i) domestic capital flight and ambiguous effects on net capital flows, investment, and growth; (ii) capital inflows and higher investment and growth; or (iii) volatile capital flows and unstable domestic financial markets. The model shows how the effects of financial globalization depend on the level of development, productivity, domestic savings, and the quality of institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document