scholarly journals Role of Early Intervention in Improving the Clinical Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis by Image Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Pancreatic Collections

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
Chittoor Ramya Sudha ◽  
Yugandhar Samireddypalle ◽  
Umamaheswara V Reddy ◽  
Sagar Dembla ◽  
Gurudutt P. Varty ◽  
...  

Background: To assess the role of image guided percutaneous drainage of acute pancreatic collections in influencing the clinical outcome     of patients. Subjects and Methods: This is a prospective study done in the department of intervention radiology, Narayana medical college. About 20 cases have been performed in our institution from January 2019 to December 2019. All these drainage procedures have been done under CT guidance. All these cases were strictly followed during their hospital course. Clinical success has been defined as control of sepsis and prevention of MODS without the requirement of surgical debridement. Results: Out of twenty cases, which we intervened, there was an improvement in clinical outcome in fourteen cases with the prevention of septic shock and multiorgan failure. Three cases were critically  ill   at the time of admission and succumbed to MODS (Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome). The other three cases required additional surgical intervention-debridement. In which, there was increased morbidity with delayed recovery in two cases, and one case developed MODS and expired. Conclusion: Image guided Percutaneous catheter drainage is a safe and effective technique to drain pancreatic collections. Adequate knowledge regarding the interpretation of imaging findings, time to intervene, adequate expertise for performing the procedure, close follow up with regular clinical assessment is vital in the management of patients in acute pancreatitis. Early and aggressive intervention helps reduce the morbidity and mortality by preventing the evolution of MODS.

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 359-365
Author(s):  
Kifayat Ganaie ◽  
Naseer Choh ◽  
Arshed Parry ◽  
Feroze Shaheen ◽  
Irfan Robbani ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. A-542
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kochhar ◽  
Jai D. Wig ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Kishore Gsb ◽  
Thakur D. Yadav

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Xiaole Zhu ◽  
Chaoqun Hou ◽  
Chenyuan Shi ◽  
Yi Miao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The efficacy of some therapeutic methods (open surgical debridement (OSD), conservative treatment (CST) and minimally invasive drainage (MID)) for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) has been widely evaluated. However, the results remained controversial. We performed this study to illuminate whether any difference in incidence exists on patients with SAP/MSAP treated with OSD and MID. Methods Eligible articles were collected base of a comprehensive review of PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, CKNI and WANGFANG for published randomized controlled trials. Two steps of meta-analysis were performed, routine pair-wise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Results Thirteen studies were included in this study. Participants were classed as 5 groups, CST, early MID (EMID), late MID (LMID), early OSD (EOSD) and late OSD (LOSD). And MID contains endoscopic drainage (ESD), percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Compared with CST, MID could decrease both mortality and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) rate but OSD couldn’t. Both EMID and MID can significantly decrease the mortality and MODS rate compared to CST. PCD might be most likely to have a benefit compared to CST. Conclusion Existing evidence for the use of MID in SAP/MSAP is reliable and it can be used as early treatment. OSD, if necessary, should be avoided or delayed as long as possible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document