scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody trends in vaccinated, multi-ethnic healthcare employees

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 552-560
Author(s):  
Beh C.C.
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Fisun Vural ◽  
Ayse Aydin Dura ◽  
Sukran Fil ◽  
Seval Ciftci ◽  
Sebahat Dilek Torun ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. S63-S64
Author(s):  
Patryk Rzonca ◽  
Mariusz Goniewicz ◽  
Katarzyna Zielonka ◽  
Grzegorz Nowicki ◽  
Maja Chrzanowska-Wasik
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke L. Werneburg ◽  
Sarah M. Jenkins ◽  
Jamie L. Friend ◽  
Bridget E. Berkland ◽  
Matthew M. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Work ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn E. Hawley ◽  
Sebastian Diaz ◽  
Christine Reid

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e035957
Author(s):  
Shannon Cheng ◽  
Jeremy Dawson ◽  
Julie Thamby ◽  
Winston R Liaw ◽  
Eden B King

ObjectivesTo examine the prevalence of aggression in healthcare and its association with employees’ turnover intentions, health and engagement, as well as how these effects differ based on aggression source (patients vs colleagues), employee characteristics (race, gender and occupation) and organisational response to the aggression.DesignMultilevel moderated regression analysis of 2010 National Health Service (NHS) survey.Setting147 acute NHS trusts in England.Participants36 850 participants across three occupational groups (14% medical/dental, 61% nursing/midwifery, 25% allied health professionals or scientific and technical staff).Main outcome measuresEmployee turnover intentions, health and work engagement.ResultsBoth forms of aggression (from patients and colleagues) have significant and substantial effects on turnover intentions, health and work engagement; however, for all three outcome variables, the effect of aggression from colleagues is more than twice the size of the effect of aggression from patients. Organisational response was found to buffer the negative effects of aggression from patients for turnover intentions and the negative effects of aggression from patients and colleagues for employee health. The results also demonstrated that nurses/midwives, women and Black employees are more likely to experience aggression; however, no clear patterns emerged on how aggression differentially impacts employees of different races, genders and occupations with respect to the outcome variables.ConclusionsAlthough aggression from patients and colleagues both have negative effects on healthcare employees’ turnover intentions, health and work engagement, these negative effects are worse when it is aggression from colleagues. Having an effective organisational response can help ameliorate the negative effects of aggression on employees’ health; however, it may not always buffer negative effects on turnover intentions and work engagement. Future research should examine other approaches, as well as how organisational responses and resources may need to differ based on aggression source.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000227
Author(s):  
Carlos Yanez ◽  
Antonio Güemes ◽  
Ana Navarro ◽  
Jacqueline Vazquez ◽  
Alberto Moreno

BackgroundThe American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Basic (BCon) course aimed at teaching hemorrhage control techniques in the USA had not yet been taught in Spain. The purpose of this study is to assess its implementation among students and healthcare employees in the Lozano Blesa University Hospital of Zaragoza, a middle-sized Spanish city.MethodsThe study was conducted in a University Hospital and at the University of Zaragoza, scheduling four free B-Con sessions from 2017 to 2018. Two groups were identified as forming the population: healthcare employees and medical students. An anonymous questionnaire was completed at the end of the course regarding content, applicability, usefulness, relevance, and satisfaction. Study variables were ranked from 0 to 10: poor (when graded from 0 to 3), fair (4 to 6) and good (7 to 10). Results were compared between the groups, expressed in percentages and χ2 tested to analyze significant differences if any.ResultsAmong the 83 individuals who completed the course, 46 were medical students and 37 healthcare employees; 61% women and 39% men; aged 21 years to 52 years. Attendees evaluated satisfaction with the highest grade (84%), followed by usefulness (73%), applicability (70%), and relevance (66%). There was no variable graded as poor. The comparison of perceptions between groups did not reveal statistical differences based on a 0.05 significance level.ConclusionWe concluded that the B-Con course was valued as good for relevance, usefulness, applicability, and satisfaction by the majority of the studied population.Level of evidenceLevel III.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document