scholarly journals Application of CISG in Arbitration: A Combined Procedure or Parallel Procedure?

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Md. Habib Alam
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Combined Procedure ◽  
International Standard ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Equal Footing ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Wrong Interpretation

CISG and arbitration are connected with each other. They may work through a combined or parallel procedure. Globalization of trade desires uniformity in trade. For uniformity of trade, we require uniform law. The arbitration may not work to make it uniform, but choosing any uniform law (i.e. CISG), it may lead to deal a particular arbitration in the international standard. The international standard may be maintained while considering the uniform law. Choosing uniform law (i.e. CISG), it may minimize the risk of wrong interpretation and put the arbitral parties on “equal footing”. Parties may consider CISG as the applicable law in their arbitral agreements. As of 13 February 2021, 94 states signed the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980 (CISG). The frontline trading states like the USA, Australia, Israel, Canada, China, Germany, France, Russia, and Japan are contracting states of CISG. This research emphasizes providing guidelines as to how parties may apply CISG into their arbitral agreements by maintaining the international standard.

Choice of Law Under the International Sales Convention: A U.S. Perspective

1983 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaak I. Dore
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Sale Of Goods ◽  
International Sales

The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods was adopted on April 10, 1980. The chief reason for its adoption was that the prior Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods (ULIS) and its supplementary Convention relating to a Uniform Law on the Formation of Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (ULF) had not received widespread support.

scholarly journals Revisiting Barter under the CISG

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Horowitz
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Trade Law ◽  
International Trade Law ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Sales ◽  
Domestic Level

As the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (hereinafter “UNCITRAL”) circulated a draft of what eventually became the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (hereinafter “CISG”), it examined the need for uniform law with respect to barter transactions. At that time in 1978, various international organizations were concerned that, while barter transactions were infrequent at the domestic level, such transactions carried growing importance in international trade.

Should Iran join the United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Moghaddam Abrishami
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Trading Partners ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Sale Of Goods

Abstract After 40 years of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (CISG), it is still controversial whether the CISG has been a successful uniform law in practice. It is, nevertheless, evident that the number of ratifications of the CISG has been increasing. This article aims to highlight the important question of whether Iran should implement the CISG. In addition, it argues that irrespective of the possible ratification of the CISG, the Iranian contract law needs to be modernized. In particular, advantages and disadvantages of the possible adoption of the CISG in Iran are explored. This article argues that acceding to the CISG will provide Iran with a number of opportunities, including the promotion of international trade with its trading partners. In proposing a model for the modernization of the Iranian Civil Code (CCI), the author, however, argues that the CISG is not the best option. Instead, the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) is the most appropriate model for reforming the Iranian contract law. This article concludes by suggesting that the combination of the CISG and the PICC is the best way forward for the Iranian legal system.

Australia and People Seeking Asylum who Arrive by Boat

2018 ◽  
pp. 518-536
Author(s):  
Caroline Fleay
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The Past ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
Repeated Use ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations

Throughout the past forty years various leaders from both major political parties in Australia have categorized the arrival by boat of people seeking asylum as a “crisis” and the people themselves as “illegal.” This is despite Australia being a signatory to the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and receiving relatively few people who seek asylum compared with many other countries. Punitive government policies and processes have further reinforced these representations, such that “crisis” and “illegal” can now be understood as both categories of analysis and practice. The repeated use of such categories may be helping to produce and reproduce prejudice and racism and obscure the needs and experiences of people seeking asylum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document