Application of Emergency Nursing in the Nursing of Patients with Severe Traumatic Shock

2021 ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jinmei Xu ◽  
Xueying Zhou ◽  
Chunying Wang ◽  
Jianli Hu

Objective. To study the value of emergency nursing mode in patients with traumatic shock. Methods. 76 patients with traumatic shock in our hospital from March 2019 to February 2021 were selected and divided into study group and control group according to different rescue modes, 38 cases in each group. The study group adopted emergency nursing mode for rescue, while the control group adopted routine nursing mode for rescue. The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time, rescue success rate, emergency rescue effect, complications, and satisfaction rate of patients and their families for rescue were compared between the two groups. Results. The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The rescue success rate of the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The improvement rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the disability rate was significantly lower than that of the control group, the overall emergency rescue effect was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The incidence of complications in the study group was 2.63%, which was significantly lower than 23.68% in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The satisfaction rate of patients and their families in the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Emergency nursing mode in patients with traumatic shock owns higher rescue value, can buy time for the operation, improve the success rate and effect of rescue, make safety and satisfaction higher. Overall, for patients with traumatic shock, emergency nursing mode is better than conventional rescue nursing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-84
Author(s):  
B. Wanot ◽  
◽  
S. Kisil ◽  
A. Biskupek-Wanot ◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 104811
Author(s):  
Tamsin Jones ◽  
Kate Curtis ◽  
Ramon Z. Shaban

Author(s):  
Tao Lin ◽  
Xianqiong Feng ◽  
Yongli Gao ◽  
Xuemei Li ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
...  

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Theobald ◽  
Fiona Maree Coyer ◽  
Amanda Jane Henderson ◽  
Robyn Fox ◽  
Bernadette F. Thomson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hospital and university service providers invest significant but separate resources into preparing registered nurses to work in the emergency department setting. This results in the duplication of both curricula and resource investment in the health and higher education sectors. This paper describes an evidence-based co-designed study with clinical-academic stakeholders from hospital and university settings. Methods The study was informed by evidence-based co-design, using emergency nursing as an exemplar. Eighteen hours of co-design workshops were completed with 21 key clinical-academic stakeholders from hospital and university settings. Results Outcomes were matrices synchronising professional and regulatory imperatives of postgraduate nursing coursework; mutually-shaped curriculum content, teaching approaches and assessment strategies relevant for postgraduate education; a new University-Industry Academic Integration Framework; five agreed guiding principles of postgraduate curriculum development for university-industry curriculum co-design; and a Graduate Certificate of Emergency Nursing curriculum exemplar. Conclusion Industry-academic service provider co-design can increase the relevance of postgraduate specialist courses in nursing, strengthening the nexus between both entities to advance learning and employability. The study developed strategies and exemplars for future use in any mutually determined academic-industry education partnership.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 100976
Author(s):  
Kate Curtis ◽  
Belinda Munroe ◽  
Margaret Fry ◽  
Julie Considine ◽  
Erin Tuala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document