scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Regenerative Procedure in Fresh Extraction Socket

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238
Author(s):  
Rafael S de Molon
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Bone Volume ◽  
Bone Plate ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this case report was to reconstruct the alveolar buccal bone plate lost in consequence of a root fracture in the maxillary central incisor area after immediate implant placement (IIP). A 48-year-old patient was referred to our office with the chief complaint of spontaneous bleeding in his left central incisor. After careful examination, the following comprehensive treatment approach was carried out: (1) Atraumatic tooth extraction, (2) IIP, (3) provisional prosthesis installation, (4) alveolar buccal bone plate reconstruction with autologous bone collected from the maxillary tuberosity, (5) gingival augmentation procedure with connective tissue graft removed from the palate, and finally (6) adjustment of the provisional restoration. After 1-year postoperative, an adequate esthetic outcome was achieved with lower cost, reduced morbidity to the patient, and lower treatment time. This approach was able to improve gingival architecture and bone volume with adequate thickness and width, enhancing patient esthetics and satisfaction. In conclusion, when proper diagnosis, precise surgical techniques, and appropriate multidisciplinary approach are employed, IIP followed by immediate dentoalveolar restoration might be considered a safe procedure to restore the peri-implant bone and gingival recession favoring the achievement of appropriate esthetic outcomes. Clinical significance The treatment planning employed was able to improve gingival architecture and bone volume with sufficient width and thickness enhancing patient esthetics and satisfaction in one single-stage procedure. How to cite this article de Molon RS, de Avila ED, Barros- Filho LAB, Cirelli JA, Borelli-Barros LA. Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Regenerative Procedure in Fresh Extraction Socket. World J Dent 2017;8(3):231-238.

Preserving the Socket Dimensions With Bone Grafting in Single Sites: An Esthetic Surgical Approach When Planning Delayed Implant Placement

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tassos Irinakis ◽  
Moe Tabesh
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Barrier Membranes ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Implant Dentistry ◽  
And Function ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement

Abstract Recent advancements in barrier membranes, bone grafting substitutes, and surgical techniques have led to a predictable arsenal of treatment methods for clinicians who practice implant dentistry. The contemporary clinician is supplied with proven knowledge, substantiated materials, and instrument inventory that allows implant placement in cases that used to be reserved for the specialist in the past because of their complexity. Nowadays, postextraction alveolar ridge maintenance can be a predictable procedure and can certainly aid the clinician in preventing ridge collapse, thereby allowing for implant placement in a position that satisfies esthetics and function. Extraction socket maintenance for future implant therapy does not rule out immediate implant placement but rather provides an additional option when treatment planning implant patients. This article will focus on the concept of extraction socket preservation using regenerative materials. It will describe a technique suggested by the authors to resist bone resorption and soft tissue shrinkage following tooth extraction.

Guidelines for Selecting the Implant Diameter During Immediate Implant Placement of a Fresh Extraction Socket: A Case Series

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariádene Pértile de Oliveira Rosa ◽  
José Martins da Rosa ◽  
Luís Pereira ◽  
Carlos Francischone ◽  
Bruno Sotto-Maior
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

scholarly journals Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penala Soumya ◽  
Pradeep Koppolu ◽  
Krishnajaneya Reddy Pathakota ◽  
Vani Chappidi
Keyword(s):  
Central Incisor ◽  
Anatomic Structure ◽  
Incisive Canal ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Thin Bone ◽  
Incisive Foramen ◽  
The Mean

Background. The incisive canal located at the midline, posterior to the central incisor, is an important anatomic structure of this area to be considered while planning for immediate implant placement in maxillary central incisor region. The purpose of the present study is to assess incisive canal characteristics using CBCT sections. Materials and Methods. CBCT scans of 79 systemically healthy patients, with intact maxillary incisors, were evaluated by two calibrated and independent examiners. Assessments included (1) mesiodistal diameter, (2) labiopalatal diameter, (3) length of the incisive canal, (4) shape of incisive canal, and (5) width of the bone anterior to the incisive foramen. Results. The mean width of the foramen labiopalatally and mesiodistally was 3.12 ± 0.94 mm and 3.23 ± 0.98 mm, respectively. Mean canal length was 18.63 ± 2.35 mm and males have significantly longer incisive canal than females. The mean width of bone anterior to the incisive canal was 6.32 ± 1.43 mm. As age of the subjects increased, incisive foramen diameter and incisive canal length were found to be increased. Cylindrical shaped incisive canals were seen in most of the individuals followed by funnel shaped and hour-glass shaped canals, and banana-like canal is least prevalent type. Conclusion. The findings from the present study suggest that the diameter and length of incisive canal vary among different individuals and presence of very thin bone anterior to the canal would suggest that a pretreatment CBCT scan is a valuable tool to evaluate anatomic variations, morphology, and dimensions of incisive foramen before immediate implant placement in maxillary central incisor region.

Fresh extraction socket: spontaneous healing vs. immediate implant placement

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1250-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Discepoli ◽  
Fabio Vignoletti ◽  
Luigi Laino ◽  
Massimo de Sanctis ◽  
Fernando Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Healing ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Socket

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Mohammed Majid Abdulmunem ◽  
Jamal Abid Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

scholarly journals Contribution of the PDL to Osteotomy Repair and Implant Osseointegration

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 909-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Pei ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
X. Yuan ◽  
Q. Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant

Our objective was to clarify the fate of the periodontal ligament (PDL) retained in the socket after tooth extraction, then determine if this tissue contributed to the osseointegration of “immediate” implants placed in these fresh extraction sockets. Mice underwent maxillary first molar extraction, the residual PDL was removed by an osteotomy, and titanium implants were placed. The osteotomy was created in such a way that the palatal surface was devoid of PDL remnants while the buccal, mesial, and distal surfaces retained PDL fibers. At multiple time points after surgery, tissues were analyzed using a battery of molecular, cellular, and histomorphometrical assays. We found that PDL remnants mineralized and directly contributed to new bone formation in the extraction site. Compared with regions of an extraction site where the PDL was removed by osteotomy, regions that retained PDL fibers had produced significantly more new bone. Around immediate implants, the retained PDL remnants directly contributed to new bone formation and osseointegration. Thus, we conclude that PDL remnants are inherently osteogenic, and if the tissue is healthy, it is reasonable to conclude that curetting out an extraction socket prior to immediate implant placement should be avoided. This recommendation aligns with contemporary trends toward minimally invasive surgical manipulations of the extraction socket prior to immediate implant placement.

scholarly journals Immediate implant placement in the maxillary central incisor region: A case report

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Hideshi Sekine ◽  
Tatsuo Taguchi ◽  
Miki Yamagami ◽  
Fumiyori Matsuzaki ◽  
Takuya Takanashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document