scholarly journals Analgesic Efficacy of Tramadol and Butorphanol in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Comparative Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Sirajul Hassan ◽  
Anees Ahmed ◽  
Manjunath Rai ◽  
TM Kalappa

ABSTRACT Background Butorphanol tartrate, a mixed synthetic agonistantagonist opioid analgesic has been used for management of postoperative pain in minor and major surgical procedures.14,20 Tramadol hydrochloride is a centrally acting opioid which is effectively used in postoperative pain in various minor and major surgeries. Materials and methods Twenty subjects selected randomly received butorphanol tartrate 1 mg intramuscular and 20 subjects received tramadol hydrochloride 50 mg intramuscular after the removal of mandibular third molars. Time of injection, amount of anesthetic injected, duration of surgery, adverse effects were recorded.21 Results The mean amount of LA administered in butorphanol group was 2.6450 ml and in tramadol group was 2.640 ml respectively, the mean duration for surgery was 56.75 and 53.5 minutes for butorphanol and tramadol groups respectively which was statistically not significant. Pain assessment was done with VAS which showed mean of 19.2 and 15.5 mm (p = 0.001) which was significant for butorphanol and tramadol respectively after 12 hours. The mean time for rescue medication requirement was 5.9 hours (for tramadol) and 8.4 hours (for butorphanol). Effective analgesic activity was seen by butorphanol 1 mg intramuscular then tramadol 50 mg. Conclusion Butorphanol 1 mg was more effective than tramadol 50 mg in respect to postoperative analgesia. How to cite this article Hassan SS, Ahmed A, Rai M, Kalappa TM. Analgesic Efficacy of Tramadol and Butorphanol in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):364-370.

Author(s):  
Negin Karimi ◽  
Behnam Khorrami ◽  
Reza Nezhadnasrollah ◽  
Yamin Haghani

Introduction: This study aimed, effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on soft tissue healing after mandibular third molar surgery. Materials & Methods: In this semi-blinded clinical trial study,30 selected patients requiring surgical extraction of soft tissue impacted mandibular third molar participated from cases referred to the Department of Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan Azad University 2017.Patients divided into both test and control groups. PRP was placed in the extracted socket of the test group, whereas the control group had no PRP. Arzhangian standard kit utilized for preparation of PRP. The outcome variables in this study were pain, swelling, inter incisal mouth opening, wound dehiscence, dry socket, bleeding, and tissue color. The collected data analyzed using statistical tests followed independent T-test, Mann-Whitney, and fisher (p value < 0.05). Results: The mean postoperative pain score (Visual Analog Scale) lowered for the test group after several wound dehiscence on the third and seventh days after surgery which was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). Although the mean bleeding time on the third day after surgery decreased in the test group, this difference was not statistically significant (p value = 0.59). There were no statistically significant between both groups for The dry socket incidence on the seventh day and the mean of inter incisal mouth opening in the third and seventh days after surgery as well. Conclusion: The usage of topical PRP has beneficial advantages on soft tissue healing after mandibular third molar surgery. Unlike the control group, The PRP group provided reduced pain and better soft tissue healing.


Author(s):  
Yandeti Srinivasulu ◽  
Abdul Wahab ◽  
P. Senthil Murugan

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of submucosal injection of dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide on postoperative pain, swelling, occurring after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. A total of 150 patients with asymptomatic, unilateral, impacted mandibular third molar, and without any systemic disease were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups randomly, one group dexamethasone, and the second group triamcinolone acetonide third group placebo. Dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide were injected into submucosa at about 0.5 cm to 1 cm above the surgical area submucosally. Pain evaluation was performed by visual analog scale (VAS).There were statistically significant differences between the three groups on the different days of the postoperative period. The effect of triamcinolone acetonide works postoperatively and the effect of triamcinolone acetonide on trismus and pain was better than other groups. There was no significant difference between the effects of dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide regarding postoperative complications. The submucosal injection of dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide might be an effective treatment following impacted mandibular third molar surgery, and triamcinolone acetonide could be applied as an alternative to dexamethasone for reducing pain post operatively for impacted mandibular third molar surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document