Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak after Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Operative Repair

Background There are limited studies regarding the impact of post-operative leak on perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) and conflicting results regarding routine drain placement in operative repair of PPUD. This study aims to identify risk factors for gastrointestinal leak after operative repair of PPUD to better guide intra-operative decisions about drain placement. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019, identifying 175 patients who underwent operative repair of PPUD. Results Patients who developed a leak (17%) were compared to patients who did not. Both hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 g/dL) ( P = .03) and duodenal ulcers ( P < .01) were identified as significant risk factors for leak. No significant difference was found between leak and no leak groups for AAST disease severity grade, repair technique, or pre-operative use of tobacco, alcohol, or steroids. Post-operative leaks were associated with prolonged hospital stay (29 days compared to 10, P < .01), increased complication rates (77% compared to 48%, P < .01), and increased re-operation rates (73% compared to 26%, <0.01). No difference was identified in patient characteristics or operative leak rates between patients who had drains placed at the index operation and those that did not. Discussion Leak after operative PPUD repair is associated with significant post-operative morbidity. Hypoalbuminemia and duodenal perforations are significant risk factors for post-operative leaks.

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak, Consideration for Proximal Diversion, and Appropriate Use of Drains

Anastomotic leaks are a major source of morbidity after colorectal surgery. There is a myriad of risk factors that may contribute to anastomotic leaks. These risk factors can be categorized as modifiable, nonmodifiable, and intraoperative factors. Identification of these risk factors allows for preoperative optimization that may minimize the risk of anastomotic leak. Knowledge of such high-risk features may also affect intraoperative decision-making regarding the creation of an anastomosis, consideration for proximal diversion, or placement of a drain. A thorough understanding of the interplay between risk factors, indications for proximal diversion, and utility of drain placement is imperative for colorectal surgeons.

EP.TH.282Adherence to ERAS® Society recommendations following elective colonic surgery (2012) in regard to urinary drainage, postoperative nutritional care and intra-abdominal drainage

Aims Evaluating adherence to ERAS® recommendations for post-operative urinary drainage, nutritional care and intra-abdominal drain placement in elective colorectal surgery. Methods Approval was obtained by the audit department of a university teaching hospital. Data was collected prospectively over a seven-week period for nineteen (n = 19) patients. Results were compared against the standard set by the ERAS® Society (2012). Results Right colonic surgery (n = 5): catheter removed on post-operative day (POD) 1 n = 1 (20%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 3 (60%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 3 (60%) and n = 4 (80%) did not have a drain placed. High anterior resection or left/subtotal colectomy (n = 9): catheter removed on POD 1 n = 3 (33%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 4 (44%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 3 (33%) and n = 2 (22%) did not have a drain placed. Low rectal surgery (n = 4*, *one patient, n = 1, excluded from all domains except intra-abdominal drainage due to immediate post-op complication): catheter removed on POD 3 n = 4 (100%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 2 (50%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 1 (25%) and all patients had a drain placed n = 5 (100%). Conclusions Adherence for urinary drainage in low rectal surgery and intra-abdominal drainage for right colonic surgery was satisfactory. Multiple areas of improvement were identified, in order to optimise compliance, and recommendations were generated. The exception may be drains for lower rectal surgery where recent data has recommended selective drain placement.