scholarly journals Shaping Ability of HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next Rotary Instruments in Curved Root Canals: A Micro-CT Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-685
Author(s):  
Ahmed K Turkistani ◽  
Madiha M Gomaa ◽  
Lubna A Shafei ◽  
Loai Alsofi ◽  
Abdul Majeed ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoel Damião SOUSA-NETO ◽  
Bruno Monguilhott CROZETA ◽  
Fabiane Carneiro LOPES ◽  
Jardel Francisco MAZZI-CHAVES ◽  
Rodrigo Dantas PEREIRA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Faisal ◽  
Rajab Saif ◽  
Mona Alsulaiman ◽  
Zuhair S. Natto

Abstract Background Various systems of nickel-titanium (NiTi) instrument have long been commercially available. However, the preparation of narrow and curved root canals has always been challenging. The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of two NiTi systems (2Shape and NeoNiTi) in severely curved root canals with different morphological patterns using micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT). Methods A total of 22 human extracted permanent teeth of mandibular first molars, with the exact mesial angle of curvature of 25 and 35 degrees, according to Schneider’s technique, were distributed randomly into two groups (group I: 2Shape, group II: NeoNiTi) based on the rotary system used (n = 22). The groups were subdivided into two subgroups corresponding to the angle of canal curvature (25° and 35°) (n = 11). Canals were scanned using Micro-CT pre- and post-preparation to assess the volume of dentin removed; canal transportation; and canal centering ratio at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. The Mann–Whitney U test was utilized to determine any significant differences between the two systems. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in volume of dentin removed; canal transportation; and centering ability for 25° and 35° canal curvatures at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex (coronal, middle, and apical) thirds (p > 0.05). At the middle third, the NeoNiTi group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in volume of dentin removed for 35° canal curvatures compared to the 2Shape group. Conclusion Within the limitation of our in vitro study, 2Shape and NeoNiTi systems with severely curved canals were confirmed to be relatively safe in preparation and to respect original canal anatomy. Nevertheless, NeoNiTi instruments produced more centered preparation and minimal canal deviation compared to the 2Shape system.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 910-914
Author(s):  
Ronald Wigler ◽  
Tal Koren ◽  
Igor Tsesis

ABSTRACT Aim To compare the cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed rotary instruments during the preparation of curved root canals in extracted human teeth. Materials and methods A total of 63 roots with curved root canals were divided into three groups. Canals were prepared using SafeSider, ProTaper Universal or Lightspeed LSX. Using pre- and post-instrumentation radiographs, straightening of the canal curvatures and loss of working length were determined with a computer image analysis program. The amounts of debris at the apical 5 mm were quantified on the basis of a numerical evaluation scale. The data were analyzed statistically using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results There was significantly more transportation among the Lightspeed LSX group compared to the SafeSider and ProTaper Universal groups only at the 4 mm level (p < 0.05). The ProTaper Universal instruments performed significantly faster than other groups. No significant differences were observed between the three engine-driven instruments with regards to debris removal. Conclusion SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX rotary instruments maintained the original canal curvature well at the apical 3 mm and were safe to use. No difference was found in cleaning efficacy and none rendered the apical part of the canal free of debris. Clinical significance SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX rotary instruments are safe to use in curved root canals. How to cite this article Wigler R, Koren T, Tsesis I. Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy of Three Engine- Driven Instruments: SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(11):910-914.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 6351-6358
Author(s):  
Gabrielė Česaitienė ◽  
Tadas Venskutonis ◽  
Vita Mačiulskienė ◽  
Vaidotas Cicėnas ◽  
Vykintas Samaitis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Stringheta ◽  
C. E. S. Bueno ◽  
A. S. Kato ◽  
L. G. Freire ◽  
E. F. Iglecias ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document