Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Penetration of different Types of Desensitizing Agents into the Dentinal Tubules: An in vivo Study
ABSTRACT Aim Aim of the study is to evaluate the depth of penetration of different types of desensitizing agents into the dentinal tubules in vivo. Materials and methods Twenty patients requiring tooth extraction for orthodontic purpose were selected. In all four premolars of the selected patients, small class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface having depth of 0.5 mm. They were divided into four groups and treated with four different types of desensitizing agents (5% NaF solution, Gluma desensitizer, FluorProtector, and SuperSeal) for required time and then they were extracted. They were longitudinally sectioned and each section was studied by scanning electron microscope. Results The mean depth of penetration of SuperSeal and Gluma was significantly higher than that of other agents (sodium fluoride and FluorProtector) (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between SuperSeal and Gluma (p>0.05). Conclusion The depth of penetration of resinous desensitizing agent (Gluma) is maximum followed by potassium oxalate solution (SuperSeal) and fluoride varnish (FluorProtector). Clinical significance Deeper the penetration of desensitizing agents into the dentinal tubules, longer the efficacy. How to cite this article Mitra A, Adhikari C. Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Penetration of different Types of Desensitizing Agents into the Dentinal Tubules: An in vivo Study. J Contemp Dent 2017;7(1):43-47.