Latarjet: Coracoid Transfer

2013 ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
T Edwards ◽  
Arnaldo Rodriguez-Santiago
Keyword(s):  
1985 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
T P Barry ◽  
S J Lombardo ◽  
R K Kerlan ◽  
F W Jobe ◽  
V S Carter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Aditya Prinja ◽  
Antony Raymond ◽  
Mahesh Pimple

Traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder is commonly treated with the Latarjet procedure, which involves transfer of the coracoid process with a conjoint tendon to the anterior aspect of the glenoid. The two most common techniques of the Latarjet are the classical and congruent arc techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in force required to dislocate the shoulder after classical and congruent arc Latarjet procedures were performed. Fourteen cadaveric shoulders were dissected and osteotomised to produce a bony Bankart lesion of 25% of the articular surface leading to an “inverted pear-shaped” glenoid. An anteroinferior force was applied whilst the arm was in abduction and external rotation using a pulley system. The force needed to dislocate was noted, and then the shoulders underwent coracoid transfer with the classical and congruent arc techniques. The average force required to dislocate the shoulder after osteotomy was 123.57 N. After classical Latarjet, the average force required was 325.71 N, compared with 327.14 N after the congruent arc technique. This was not statistically significant. In this biomechanical cadaveric study, there is no difference in the force required to dislocate a shoulder after classical and congruent arc techniques of Latarjet, suggesting that both methods are equally effective at preventing anterior dislocation in the position of abduction and external rotation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199323
Author(s):  
Kenta Shibuya ◽  
Takayuki Kawasaki ◽  
Yoshinori Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshinori Gonda ◽  
Yoshiaki Itoigawa ◽  
...  

Background: Although surgical shoulder stabilization via coracoid transfer in collision athletes is effective and has a low reinjury rate, the factors affecting poor clinical results and the superiority of the 2 stabilization procedures (Bristow and Latarjet) remain unclear. Purpose: To explore the factor(s) affecting poor clinical results of coracoid transfer in a large cohort of rugby players and to compare postoperative function between the Bristow and Latarjet procedures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 169 consecutive shoulders of 154 competitive male rugby players who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery (Bankart repair with coracoid transfer) between 2014 and 2018 and had a mean follow-up of 2.7 years (minimum follow-up, 2 years). The Bristow procedure was performed in the first 92 shoulders (84 players), and the Latarjet procedure was performed in the latter 77 shoulders (70 players). A poor clinical result was defined as a postoperative Rowe score of <70 and a postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score of >630. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors affecting postoperative functional failure. The postoperative scores and complication rates were also compared between the 2 procedures. Results: In total, 92.3% of the rugby players returned to their preinjury competition level at a mean of 5.9 months postoperatively. The Rowe and WOSI scores showed that shoulder function was improved postoperatively compared with preoperatively. The number of rugby players with a poor clinical result was 18 (10.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a poor clinical result was associated with a preoperative glenoid bone defect of >20% of the glenoid width (odds ratio, 9.8), whereas the clinical result was unaffected by the type of coracoid transfer. There were no differences between the 2 procedures in any of the postoperative scores or complication rates. Conclusion: The present study indicated that the most effective predictor of postoperative functional scores was the degree of the glenoid bone defect and not the type of coracoid transfer. This information may be useful for the strategic treatment of shoulder dislocations in collision athletes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document