scholarly journals Posterior Foraminotomy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Nagatomo ◽  
Kazunori Yone ◽  
Kyoji Hayashi ◽  
Shunji Matsunaga ◽  
Setsuro Komiya
2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Grundy ◽  
Timothy J. Germon ◽  
Steven S. Gill

Object. The anterolateral and posterior transpedicular foraminotomies were developed to enhance the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy secondary to uncovertebral osteophytes. These novel surgical approaches may be advantageous because they allow direct decompression of the nerve root while preserving normal movement and stability of the motion segment. The use of the pedicle to obtain access to compressive uncovertebral osteophytes, without causing damage to the motion segment, has not been previously reported. Methods. The authors present the early outcome data obtained in 27 patients who underwent an anterolateral or posterior foraminotomy. Eighty-eight percent of patients who underwent anterolateral foraminotomy and 94% of those who underwent a posterior transpedicular procedure experienced complete or significant relief of brachialgia. Post-operatively none of the patients were symptomatically or neurologically worse. Conclusions. The transpedicular approach is an effective and potentially improved method of treating symptomatic cervical uncovertebral osteophytes compared with techniques previously described.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Ho Lee ◽  
Jae Hwan Cho ◽  
Chang Ju Hwang ◽  
Choon Sung Lee ◽  
Chunghwan Kim ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554458-s-0035-1554458
Author(s):  
Ramiro Barrera ◽  
Osvaldo Medina

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bikash Bose

Object. Placing instrumentation in the anterior cervical spine is a common procedure. The bi- and unicortical systems currently available, however, have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The author reports a prospective series in which a new dynamized anterior cervical fixation system was evaluated. Methods. Thirty-seven patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in which the DOC ventral cervical stabilization system was used for indications including cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, disc herniation, trauma, and myelopathy. Patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion and/or corpectomy. Preoperative and postoperative clinical data included assessment of spinal cord and nerve root deficit, function, neck pain, and arm pain. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic data included sagittal angle, translation, and settling of the graft. Fusion status was determined by the presence of trabecular bridging bone on plain anteroposterior and lateral cervical radiographs. At a mean follow-up time of 1.3 years, postoperative neck or arm pain was resolved in 52% of the patients, restriction on function was mild or absent in 88%, and fusion was successful in 80% of patients and 88% of the treated levels. There was one implant-related complication, one significant dysphagia complication, and a 10.8% donor graft site complication rate. Conclusions. The use of this system led to a high percentage of pain relief and radiographic fusion. The sagittal angle was controlled while allowing for graft settling. There were no implant failures.


Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxuan Huang ◽  
Jiabi Zhang ◽  
Buhui Xiong ◽  
Ruina Huang ◽  
Wenjing Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Thunder-fire moxibustion originated in China and contains traditional Chinese medicine. It can produce strong firepower, infrared thermal radiation, and medicinal effects when burning on the acupoints. Thunder-fire moxibustion is commonly used in patients with neck pain, but its efficacy has rarely been systematically demonstrated. We designed a randomized trial of thunder-fire moxibustion on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) to investigate whether it is more effective than ibuprofen sustained-release capsules. Methods One hundred patients will be recruited and randomly divided into thunder-fire moxibustion and ibuprofen groups. The intervention consists of ten treatments and will last for 2 weeks. The Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale is used as the primary outcome measure. It contains a combination of the self-conscious symptom in patients, objective clinical evaluation from doctors, and social evaluation (the ability to work and live). The objective and comprehensive evaluation of CSR patients before and after treatment is particularly needed. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), Neck Disability Index score scale (NDI), and the Quality of Life Assessment (SF-36) are applied as secondary outcome measures. The assessment will take place at the baseline and the first and second weekends of treatment. If an adverse event (AEs) occurs, it will be reported. Discussion The aim of this trial is to determine whether thunder-fire moxibustion is more effective than ibuprofen in the treatment of patients with CSR. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR1800018820. Registered on 11 October 2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document