2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rima Alkirawan ◽  
Ramin Kawous ◽  
Evert Bloemen ◽  
Maria E.T.C. van den Muijsenbergh ◽  
Simone Goosen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Antibiotic resistance is an international public health concern. Medical culture influences antibiotic use. Migrants, like Syrian refugees, are confronted with a different health care system in their new country and also with different culture regarding antibiotic prescription. The aim of this study is to get insight into the perspectives, knowledge and practices among Syrian refugees regarding antibiotic use and prescribing in Dutch primary care.Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 12 Syrian refugees living in the Netherlands was conducted. Results: participants stressed the easy access to antibiotics in Syria and reported storing antibiotics at home for emergencies. In the Netherlands, some of them still self-prescribed antibiotics while others adhered to the Dutch GP’s advice. Syrian refugees believed in having a weaker immunity compared to the Dutch inhabitants. For their young children, they adhered to the new health care system which resulted in not giving the children antibiotics without a prescription. Several complaints about the Dutch health care system were identified such as difficult access to the desired medication and lack of medical care for their complaints. Most respondents preferred the Syrian health care system.Conclusion: Syrian refugees experienced restricted access to antibiotics in Dutch primary care which was contrary to their experiences in Syria. As a reaction, they continued self-medicating with antibiotics. However, some of them adapted to the Dutch health care culture and accepted the alternative treatment proposal. For their children most participants adhered to the prescription policy of antibiotics in the Netherlands.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. HOLLAND ◽  
N.J.A. VAN EXEL ◽  
F.T. SCHUT ◽  
W.B.F. BROUWER

AbstractTo contain expenditures in an increasingly demand driven health care system, in 2005 a no-claim rebate was introduced in the Dutch health insurance system. Since demand-side cost sharing is a very controversial issue, the no-claim rebate was launched as a consumer friendly bonus system to reward prudent utilization of health services. Internationally, the introduction of a mandatory no-claim rebate in a social health insurance scheme is unprecedented. Consumers were entitled to an annual rebate of ₠ 255 if no claims were made. During the year, all health care expenses except for GP visits and maternity care were deducted from the rebate until the rebate became zero. In this article, we discuss the rationale of the no-claim rebate and the available evidence of its effect. Using a questionnaire in a convenience sample, we examined people’s knowledge, attitudes, and sensitivity to the incentive scheme. We find that only 4% of respondents stated that they would reduce consumption because of the no-claim rebate. Respondents also indicated that they were willing to accept a high loss of rebate in order to use a medical treatment. However, during the last month of the year many respondents seemed willing to postpone consumption until the next year in order to keep the rebate of the current year intact. A small majority of respondents considered the no-claim rebate to be unfair. Finally, we briefly discuss why in 2008 the no-claim rebate was replaced by a mandatory deductible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document