scholarly journals Editorial boards of dermatology journals and their potential financial conflict of interest

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn M Updyke ◽  
Wei Niu ◽  
Chelsea St Claire ◽  
Emma Schlager ◽  
Michael Knabel ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn M Updyke ◽  
Wei Niu ◽  
Chelsea St Claire ◽  
Emma Schlager ◽  
Michael Knabel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa V. Cherla ◽  
Cristina P. Viso ◽  
Julie L. Holihan ◽  
Karla Bernardi ◽  
Maya L. Moses ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip C. Calder

Keen readers of the BJN will have noticed the recent appearance of ‘conflict of interest’ statements and of more complete descriptions of the contribution of each author to the publication. I have introduced these innovations in order to increase the transparency of the articles that we publish in the BJN; further strategies to increase accuracy, transparency and accountability of papers published in the journal will follow in order to encourage a climate of intellectual honesty and to decrease the risk of misconduct. In particular, the journal will follow as closely as possible the recommendations and guidelines of the Committee on Publishing Ethics (COPE)(1) and of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)(2). COPE and ICMJE have made available a range of guidelines aimed at establishing best practice in scientific publishing. These include guidelines for authors and for the conduct of reviewers, editorial boards and editors. Many of the guidelines are already followed by the BJN, but others are not yet fully in place.


2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
_ _

Relationships between industry and neurosurgeons engaged in both clinical practice and research have become increasingly complicated due to increased utilization of expensive devices in day-to-day neurosurgical practice. The Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) has always had a policy of demanding open disclosure of any real, potential, or even perceived conflict of interest by authors submitting scientific manuscripts. Recently, the editor-in-chief and members of the editorial boards, after much discussion of this issue, decided that this policy of open disclosure should be enhanced and more specifically defined. In addition, we felt that such a policy should be extended to all reviewers of articles submitted for publication to JNSPG journals—both members of the editorial boards and ad hoc reviewers. To clarify, extend, and specify the JNSPG's policy in this respect, the editor and editorial boards developed a task force on “Conflict of Interest.” The task force, after considerable discussion with the full editorial boards, developed the following Conflict of Interest policy as well as the forms that submitting authors, editorial board members, and other reviewers are now required to complete.


2018 ◽  
Vol 226 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa V. Cherla ◽  
Oscar A. Olavarria ◽  
Karla Bernardi ◽  
Cristina P. Viso ◽  
Maya L. Moses ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Jacques Belghiti ◽  
Stéphanie Luzio ◽  
David Fuks ◽  
Gregory Emery

INTRODUCTION:To minimize the potential impact of conflicts of interest on health recommendations, several health institutions may be reluctant to recruit academic physicians due to their potential close relationship with industry. The present study aimed at evaluating the influence of academic physicians (AP) on the “rate of deport” due to financial support in the national commission of the HAS assessing medical devices.METHODS:After the renewal of this commission in November 2015, introducing patients representatives and more academic physicians, two periods of 12 months immediately before and after that date have been compared regarding the rate of deport during the sessions. Deport were decided by the legal section of our institution one week before each meeting according to a complete analysis of potential financial conflict of interest related to the medical device assessed. Only members without significant financial conflicts were allowed to participate to the discussion and the vote. The assessment of potential conflict of interest of all members followed the same criteria during the two periods.RESULTS:The number of physicians increased in the second period (nineteen versus twenty-three) with a significant higher rate of academic physicians (63 percent versus 82 percent, p = .001). The mean attendance of physicians was significantly lower during the second period (80 percent versus 65 percent, p = .03). During the two periods, the number of meetings (n = 22) was similar and the number of dossiers assessing new products was comparable (96 versus 104, p = .872). The decision to reimburse the medical devices was similar in the two periods (78 percent versus 73 percent, p = .681). The number of cases when physicians’ members were deported for conflict of interest was similar during the two periods (30 versus 28, p = .482) with not any increase among academic physicians.CONCLUSIONS:This study showed that it is possible to recruit several academic physicians without major financial conflicts of interest providing that their status could alter their assiduity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document