scholarly journals Necessity of performing routine tests in trauma patients referring to emergency departments

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-276
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Jahanian ◽  
Seyed Hosseininejad ◽  
Nadia Rostamian ◽  
Siavash Moradi ◽  
Farzad Bozorgi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Demet Yaldiz ◽  
◽  
Gokhan Akbulut ◽  
Murat Anil ◽  
Mustafa Onur Oztan ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 241 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry M. Gentilello ◽  
Beth E. Ebel ◽  
Thomas M. Wickizer ◽  
David S. Salkever ◽  
Frederick P. Rivara

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Knott ◽  
Stephen Gomori ◽  
Mai Ngyuen ◽  
Susan Pedrazzani ◽  
Sridevi Sattaluri ◽  
...  

AbstractCombining survey data with alternative data sources (e.g., wearable technology, apps, physiological, ecological monitoring, genomic, neurocognitive assessments, brain imaging, and psychophysical data) to paint a complete biobehavioral picture of trauma patients comes with many complex system challenges and solutions. Starting in emergency departments and incorporating these diverse, broad, and separate data streams presents technical, operational, and logistical challenges but allows for a greater scientific understanding of the long-term effects of trauma. Our manuscript describes incorporating and prospectively linking these multi-dimensional big data elements into a clinical, observational study at US emergency departments with the goal to understand, prevent, and predict adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae (APNS) that affects over 40 million Americans annually. We outline key data-driven system challenges and solutions and investigate eligibility considerations, compliance, and response rate outcomes incorporating these diverse “big data” measures using integrated data-driven cross-discipline system architecture.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1178
Author(s):  
Heba Kalbouneh ◽  
Omar Alajoulin ◽  
Jamil Shawaqfeh ◽  
Ayman Mustafa ◽  
Shehab Jaber ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: The incidence of accessory bones in the region of foot and ankle is quite variable between studies and are often confused with avulsion fractures in trauma patients with musculoskeletal injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of accessory ossicles of the foot and ankle according to gender, side and coexistence, and to determine how frequently accessory ossicles were misdiagnosed as avulsion fractures. Materials and Methods: Oblique and/or lateral foot radiographs of 1000 adult patients referred from emergency departments to foot and ankle clinic were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of accessory ossicles. The Kappa statistic was used in order to assess the validity of radiographic interpretation for the presence of these bones. Results: Accessory ossicles were detected in 40.2% of the radiographs. The incidence rates for the accessory ossicles in order of frequency were: Os trigonum (15.4%), accessory navicular (13.7%), os peroneum (11.5%), os vesalianum (1.1%), os supranaviculare (0.7%), os subfibulare (0.6%), os talotibiale (0.4%), os calcaneus secundarius (0.3%), os supratalare (0.3%), os infranaviculare (0.3%), os intermetatarseum (0.2%), and os subtibiale (0.1%). Coexistence of two or three ossicles in the same foot was observed in 4.4% of the cases, mostly coexistence with os peroneum (2.9%), followed by accessory navicular (1.6%). 2.7% of accessory ossicles were initially misdiagnosed as avulsion fractures at emergency departments. Interrater agreement over identification of different accessory ossicles was found to be reasonably reliable, with a Kappa greater than 0.80 for all assessed bones. Conclusions: In clinical practice, a thorough knowledge of normal anatomical variants is essential to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment and can help to prevent diagnostic errors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Whiley ◽  
H. Alves ◽  
S. Grace

The levels of traumatic injury seen in South African emergency departments (EDs) are epidemic. This is coupled with a severe lack of resources and adequately trained emergency staff. The Lodox Statscan (LS) is an X-ray scanner capable of producing rapid, low-dose, and full-body X-ray images. In this paper, a new trauma protocol—the Johannesburg trauma protocol—that implements LS scanning on entry to the ED as a triage tool is reported. A case study illustrating the use of LS to triage 63 patients in a single Saturday shift at a level 1 Trauma Centre is also presented. Because of the ability to rapidly and safely provide X-ray imaging information to support clinical decision making, the LS could be a useful tool to aid in resource allocation to improve treatment of the high levels of trauma patients that present to South African EDs daily.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document