scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF A AND B IN PITYRIASIS VERSICOLOR

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl-1) ◽  
pp. S273-76
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
Naeem Raza ◽  
Ayesha Anwar ◽  
Ayesha Khokhar

Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral fluconazole and oral itraconazole in the treatment of Pityriasisversicolor. Study Design: Comparative prospective study. Methodology: Total 72 patients of both genders with Pityriasis versicolor were included. Patients were randomly allocated into two treatment groups with 36 patients in each group: group A and group B by lottery method. Patients in group A received Cap Fluconazole 150 mg bi- weekly for two consecutive weeks while those in group B received two doses of 400 mg of itraconazole once weekly for two weeks. Patients were asked to follow-up after 4 weeks skin scrapings for microscopy using 10% KOH mount was done at follow-up. Efficacy was assessed in terms of negative fungal hyphae on microscopy. Results: In this study, age ranged from 18 to 40 years with mean age of 33.52 ± 4.12 years in group A, whereas35.055 ± 4.18 years in group B. Mean duration of disease was 4.66 ± 1.51 months in group A and 5.27 ± 1.70months in group B. Efficacy was seen in 77.8% of group A patients as compared to 50% in group B patients(p=0.014). Conclusion: Oral Fluconazole two doses of 150 mg/week (total 300mg/week) for two consecutive weeks wasfound more effective than oral itraconazole.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1551-1555
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdulameer Alwan ◽  
Hussain T. Ajeel ◽  
Ahmed Hamza Abd

To evaluate the efficacy & safety of tamsulosin alone versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil combination as expulsive medical treatment of distal ureteric calculus. From March 2015 utile March 2017, two hundred patients (one hundred thirty males and seventy females), who attended the outpatient urology clinic and presented with stones size 5 to 10 mm in distal ureteric part, have been randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups. Group A treated with tamsulosin alone, and group B treated with tamsulosin plus tadalafil. Both treatments were given for a maximum of six weeks’ duration. The rate and time to the calculous passage, type of analgesic use, adverse effects of the drugs, number of outpatient urology clinic visits for pain, and follow-up were noted. Both treatment groups have higher expulsion rate with a lower time to expulsion with no statistically significant differences between them (p=0.350, p=0.074, respectively). Group B showed a significantly lower rate in admission to the hospital for pain and need for analgesia than in group A. no dangerous adverse events had been observing in both groups. Additional benefit seen in group B was the improvement in erectile function regarding male patients. Using tamsulosin and tadalafil as an expulsive medical treatment for distal ureteric calculous is safe and efficacious. Such combination therapy may provide additional advantages in cases of erectile dysfunction co-exist with distal ureteric calculi.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umar Javed ◽  
Sidra Aleem ◽  
Sheraz Jamil Asif ◽  
Javed Iqbal

Objectives: To compare the recurrence rate between incision drainage andmultiple needle aspiration for breast abscess treatment. Study Design: Randomized ControlledTrial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. StudyDuration: 29th September 2015 to 29th June 2016. Materials & Methods: A total of 60 femalepatients with breast abscess of <2 cm in size and of duration <2 weeks between 20 to 40 yearsof age were included. Patients with multiple breast abscesses, recurrent breast abscesses andcomplicated abscesses were excluded. The patients were randomized into Group A (incisionand drainage) & Group B (needle aspiration), by using lottery method. Follow up was done forup to 7 days and recurrence was noted. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was30.83 ± 5.67 years and in group B was 31.53 ± 5.73 years. Mean duration of disease was 7.58± 2.83 days. Mean size of abscess was 0.86 ± 0.43 cm. Recurrence was found in 07 (23.33%)patients in group A (incision drainage) while in 21 (70.0%) patients in group B (multiple needleaspiration) with p-value of 0.000 which is statistically significant. Conclusion: The recurrencerate is less after incision & drainage as compared to multiple needle aspirations for treatingbreast abscess.


2019 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2018-313313
Author(s):  
Isaac Aleman ◽  
Javier Castillo Velazquez ◽  
Sloan W Rush ◽  
Ryan B Rush

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) administered preoperatively to patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for severe manifestations of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).DesignRandomised clinical trial (RCT).MethodsTwo hundred and six patients with PDR-related complications requiring PPV were randomised into one of two treatment groups: Group A received IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) 1–10 days before PPV, while Group B received IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) 1–10 days before PPV. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were perioperative tractional retinal detachment (TRD) rates, surgical times, intraoperative and postoperative complications and incidence of unplanned PPV during the 6 month study interval.ResultsOne hundred and seventy three subjects underwent PPV and completed the 6-month follow-up interval. Group A subjects had better BCVA at 6 months (p=0.0035), shorter surgical times (p=0.0013) and were less likely to have a recurrence of vitreous haemorrhaging in the postoperative period (p=0.0101) when compared with subjects in Group B. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with regards to baseline characteristics, perioperative TRD development, intraoperative complications and incidence of unplanned PPV during the 6 month study interval.ConclusionsThis RCT demonstrated better final visual outcomes, shorter operating times and less vitreous haemorrhage recurrences in the postoperative period when subjects received IVZ compared to IVB prior to PPV for the treatment of PDR-related complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1871-1873
Author(s):  
Shabana Sharif ◽  
Rehan Ramzan Khan ◽  
Saima Riaz ◽  
Sajid Rashid ◽  
Zaigham Rasool Athar ◽  
...  

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of ponseti versus kite method for the management of club foot among children. Methods: A quasi experimental trial was conducted to determine the most effective conservative method for managing idiopathic club foot. This study was carried out in District Head Quarter Hospital, Layyah. A total of 46 children (60 Feet) aged less than six months of both genders were included in this study using convenience sampling technique. The study sample was divided into Group A (Ponseti) and Group B (Kite). Each treatment group comprises of 30 feet. Patients were called for weekly follow up till ten weeks consecutively. At every follow-up visit, patients were assessed to check the improvement of deformity with the help of the Pirani scoring system for the foot. Pirani score difference was measured in both treatment groups from the baseline until the last follow-up interval until the 10th Week. Pirani score difference was measured in both treatment groups from the baseline until the last follow-up interval until the 10th Week. A greater negative value signified better correction. SPSS 23 was used for data entry and analysis. Results: Children's mean age in both treatment groups (A and B) was 10.83±4.59 and 10.20±4.75 weeks. At presentation mean Pirani score in both treatment groups (A and B) was 5.85±0.67 and 5.86±0.45, respectively, while at 10th follow up it was 1.42±0.39 and 2.35±0.54 for group A and group B, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the Ponseti technique significantly improved the management of club foot as that of the Kites method. Ponseti's method is more effective in terms of rapid improvement in the involved group. Key words: Non operative Management, Idiopathic Club foot, Kites method, Ponseti method.


Author(s):  
G. Chitti Babu ◽  
Kavita Dhar Bagati ◽  
Praveen Agarwal ◽  
Jyostna Sharma

Background: Efficacy of these modalities as shown by various investigations are inconsistent and ambiguous. Thus, evidence based effective treatment option is warranted. Aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin and benzyl benzoate in the treatment of uncomplicated scabies.Methods: Patients with confirmed diagnosis of scabies were included in this study. One hundred and ninety-five subjects were included in this investigation as per inclusion and exclusion criteria laid down. Equal numbers of patients were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Efficacy of three groups [oral ivermectin (Group A), topical permethrin (Group B) and benzyl benzoate (Group C)] of drugs was compared in terms of improvement in clinical grading of disease (%) and improvement in clinical grading of pruritus (%) during follow up visits.Results: Those subjects receiving topical permethrin, at 1st follow up 56.9% showed cure rate which increased to 89.2% at 2nd follow up with respect to clinical improvement in pruritus. Maximum relief in severity of pruritus at the end of 6th week was reported by 58(89.2%) patients receiving group B treatment modality followed by 52 patients (80%) in arm A. Regarding efficacy of three treatment groups in terms of improvement in severity of lesion at the end of 6 weeks, maximum number of patients 57(87.7%), receiving group B treatment reported improvement which is better than other two treatment groups.Conclusions: maximum number of patients receiving topical Permethrin treatment reported improvement better than other Oral Ivermectin therapy and topical benzyl benzoate. Oral ivermectin may serve a good alternative for managing scabies under certain conditions like poor compliance to topical scabicides.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 471-476
Author(s):  
Malik Muhammad Yasin Awan ◽  
Ijaz Ahmad ◽  
Amer Aziz

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac in the treatment ofosteoarthritis. Study design: Randomized double blind Phase IV trial. Place and Duration ofstudy: This study was conducted in the department of Orthopaedics & Spine Surgery, GhurkiTrust Teaching Hospital, Lahore. The duration was eight weeks. Methodology: A total of 90subjects, fulfilling the inclusion criteria and willing to give free informed consent were enrolled inthis trial. All these subjects were randomized into two treatment groups (A & B). Subjects eitherreceived Aceclofenac 100 mg twice daily or Diclofenac 75 mg twice daily for 08 weeks. During thescreening visit, information on their demographic characteristics, medical history and previousand current medications were collected. A thorough physical examination and necessarylaboratory investigations were carried out before drug administration and after the completion oftreatment (end of week 8). Clinical examination was done at baseline visit, randomization and 2, 4and 8 weeks. Gastrointestinal (GI) safety was assessed using adverse drug reaction (ADR)reports. WOMAC questionnaire was used to see improvement in activities of daily living and painwas assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). All data was collected in the case report form(CRF). Statistical evaluation was performed at the end of the trial and results were analyzed usingSPSS. Results: 70 subjects completed the study while 20 were lost in follow-up. There were 28males and 34 females in the study with mean age of 56 years. There was a significant decrease inWOMAC and VAS scores in both groups. In group A (Diclofenac group) VAS decreased from7.107 to 2.538 (p= 0.000) and WOMAC decreased from 32.75 to 7.38 (p=0.000). In group B(Aceclofenac group), VAS decreased from 7.912 to 6.0 (p=0.001) while WOMAC decreased from37.29 to 21.50 (p=0.000) showing the efficacy of both drugs. There was also significant decreasein the disease severity in both groups at the end of treatment. But the safety profile of (Diclofenac)group A was not significant (p=0.767) as compared to (Aceclofenac) group B (p=0.022).Conclusions: Aceclofenac is efficacious and safe drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis in adultsas compared to Diclofenac.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 844-848
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
◽  
Jia-Ying Sun ◽  
Qian Ye ◽  
Yun-Hai Tu ◽  
...  

AIM: To establish the necessity of silicone tube intubation in acute dacryocystitis (AD) patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR). METHODS: Patients presenting with unilateral AD were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. En-DCR procedures were performed following lacrimal abscess formation, with the operation being performed with silicone intubation for patients in group B but not group A. Functional success was defined by an absence of additional AD episodes, no epiphora, and ostium patency as established via endoscopic evaluation or fluorescein irrigation. Operative success rates and demographic variables were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients were analyzed in the present study (33 per group), with complete postoperative data having been successfully collected from 27 and 22 patients in group A and group B, respectively. All patients exhibited complete resolution of acute inflammation. Upon follow-up, granulation tissue was detected around the ostium at higher rates in group B (9/22, 40.9%) relative to group A (4/27, 14.8%). At the 12-month follow-up time point, patients in group A exhibited higher success rates (25/27, 92.6%) relative to patients in group B (20/22, 90.9%), but this difference was not significant. Cases of lacrimal passage reconstruction failure in both groups were attributed to excessive fibrous and/or granulation tissue formation proximal to the intranasal ostium. CONCLUSION: Given that these two operative approaches are associated with similar rates of operative success and in light of differences in granulation tissue formation, cost, and operative duration, these data do not support the routine silicone intubation of AD patients following En-DCR surgery.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1730-1730
Author(s):  
Danyu Sun ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Basel Rouphail ◽  
Robert M Dean ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: A common approach to initial treatment for young, fit patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (ASCT). Induction regimens with modifications of R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone) and/or incorporation of high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) appear more effective than RCHOP alone, as in R-HyperCVAD/MA (cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate-cytarabine, MDACC), R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP (rituximab-dexamethasone-cytarabine-cisplatin, European MCL Network) and dose intensified R-CHOP alternating with HiDAC followed by ASCT (Nordic Lymphoma Group). At the Cleveland Clinic, in 2010 we adopted as our standard induction regimen a modification of the Nordic protocol, using standard dose R-CHOP alternating with R-HiDAC for 3 cycles each or, for pts who had already been treated with R-CHOP x 6 cycles prior to referral for ASCT, an additional 2 R-HiDAC. Here we report analysis of our institutional experience with this regimen. We use as historical comparison pts with MCL who underwent ASCT at our institution following R-HyperCVAD/MA or R-CHOP. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 87 MCL pts who received first line therapy including ASCT at Cleveland Clinic from Aug 1999 - Apr 2014. Pt characteristics, treatment regimens and biological markers were evaluated with regard to overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS). Pts were grouped according to induction chemotherapy: Group A (HyperCVAD/MA x4 cycles), Group B (R-CHOP x 6 cycles), and Group C (R-CHOP alternating with R-HiDAC for 6 total cycles or R-CHOP x 6 cycles followed by HiDAC x 2 cycles). All pts received ASCT consolidation therapy with high dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide. OS and RFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify univariable prognostic factors for OS and RFS. Results: The median age of the entire cohort was 59 years (range: 41-73), with male predominance (74%). All pts had ECOG performance score ≤1, MIPI low/intermediate/high scores were 57%/30%/13%. Complete remission prior to ASCT was achieved in 76% of pts. Pt characteristics, including MIPI scores, were evenly distributed among three treatment groups except for: (1) age (median age at diagnosis Group A=53 yr, Group B=62 yr, and Group C=57 yr, P<0.001) (2) more blastoid subtype in Group A (19%) while Group C had no blastoid subtypes of MCL (0%, P=0.03); and (3) higher proportion of patients in Group C with comorbidities (85.7%, p=0.003). With a median follow-up of 26.6 months, 2 year OS rate (Fig. 1) was 95.2%, 94.7% and 100% in groups A, B and C respectively; 2 year RFS rate (Fig. 2) of 85.7%, 73.7% and 93.3% respectively. In univariate analysis, blastoid subtype (HR=5.37, 95% CI 1.97-14.6), and high risk MIPI score (HR=14, 95% CI 3.38-57.6) were predictive of OS as well as of RFS (HR = 2.76, 95% 1.14-6.69 and HR 6.45, 95% CI 2.41-17.2). Post-ASCT treatment was required for 41% of pts, 8 pts (42.1%) in group A, 38 pts (58.3%) in group B and 5 pts (17.9%) in group C, although pts in group C had shortest follow up to date. In conclusion, our outcomes for pts with newly diagnosed MCL demonstrated no statistically significant difference in OS and RFS among the 3 treatment groups. While longer followup is needed, these data suggest that our less toxic approach of using standard dose and schedule R-CHOP alternating with R-HiDAC, without dose-intense R-CHOP or addition of methotrexate or cisplatin, is highly effective pre-ASCT first line therapy for MCL. Fig 1. Fig 1. Fig. 2 Fig. 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Gasbarro ◽  
Luca Traina ◽  
Francesco Mascoli ◽  
Vincenzo Coscia ◽  
Gianluca Buffone ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Absorbable sutures are not generally accepted by most vascular surgeons for the fear of breakage of the suture line and the risk of aneurysmal formation, except in cases of paediatric surgery or in case of infections. Aim of this study is to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of the use of absorbable suture materials in carotid surgery. Patients and methods: In an 11 year period, 1126 patients (659 male [58.5 %], 467 female [41.5 %], median age 72) underwent carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis by either conventional with primary closure (cCEA) or eversion (eCEA) techniques. Patients were randomised into two groups according to the type of suture material used. In Group A, absorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid) was used and in Group B non-absorbable suture material (polypropylene) was used. Primary end-point was to compare severe restenosis and aneurysmal formation rates between the two groups of patients. For statistical analysis only cases with a minimum period of follow-up of 12 months were considered. Results: A total of 868 surgical procedures were considered for data analysis. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 1-10 years). The rate of postoperative complications was better for group A for both cCEA and eCEA procedures: 3.5 % and 2.0 % for group A, respectively, and 11.8 % and 12.9 % for group B, respectively. Conclusions: In carotid surgery, the use of absorbable suture material seems to be safe and effective and with a general lower complications rate compared to the use of non-absorbable materials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-146
Author(s):  
Simone Zanella ◽  
Enrico Lauro ◽  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Francesco Buccelletti ◽  
Annalisa Potenza ◽  
...  

Background: Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair (LIVHR) is a safe and worldwide accepted procedure performed using absorbable tacks. The aim of the study was to evaluate recurrence rate in a long term follow-up and whether the results of laparoscopic IVH repair in the elderly (≥65 years old) are different with respect to results obtained in younger patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients (74 women and 55 men, median age 67 years, range = 30-87 years) with ventral (N = 42, 32.5%) or post incisional (N = 87, 67.5%) hernia were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: group A (N = 55, 42.6%) aged <65 years and group B (N = 74, 57.4%) aged ≥65 years. Results: The mean operative time was not significantly different between groups (66.7 ± 37 vs. 74 ± 48.4 min, p = 0.4). To the end of 2016, seven recurrences had occurred (group A = 3, group B = 4, p = 1). Complications occurred in 8 (16%) patients in group A and 21 (28.3%) patients in group B. Conclusion: In conclusion, our results confirm that the use of absorbable tacks does not increase recurrence frequency and laparoscopic incisional and ventral repair is a safety procedure also in elderly patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document