An Research Into The Reactive Safety Action Program for Promoting Aviation Safety Culture

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-173
Author(s):  
Dae Ho Kim
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gráinne Murphy ◽  
Marina Efthymiou

Safety is at the heart of the aviation system, accident rates are on a steady downward trend with 2.1 accidents per million departures in 2016, representing the lowest annual aviation accident rate. It is predicted that globally the airline industry will grow, expecting 7.2 billion passengers to travel in 2035 (IATA, 2016). The airport domain is a complex socio technical environment where an airline receives a range of services and is the focal point for the convergence of ground activities, part of its role is creating the ‘safety picture’ and a ‘safety space’ for its industry customers to provide these services to aircraft operators. All operators (excluding ground-handling service providers) at European Union (EU) airports are regulated by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) regulations and now all have Safety Management Systems in place. Using Dublin Airport as a case study, the paper explores safety culture and safety challenges amongst operators in the multi stakeholder context of Dublin airport’s airside operations. In particular, the paper argues that (i) the attitudes of airport stakeholders on the effectiveness of Safety Management Systems were positive with good indicators of an engaged safety culture, (ii) operators strive for safe airport operations as well as achieving compliance operations and (iii) attitudes towards multi stakeholder safety management depend on the primary relationship held by each party. Finally, the paper recommends strategies to be adopted to enhance and improve multi stakeholder safety culture at Dublin Airport.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Ho Kim ◽  
Jeong Yeol Choi

1985 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina W. Brown

The Adjective Checklist, Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist, Depression Adjective Checklist, and Profile of Mood States were administered to 166 males enrolled in an Alcohol Safety Action Program. Although a few individual scales showed significant differences between groups, a stepwise multiple discriminant analysis of combined test scales identified two functions, Intrapersonal Attributes which accounted for 84% of the variance and Personal Adequacy, accounting for 15.9% of the variance. The combined test results correctly classified 62% of the clients. Cross-validation is planned.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document