Embolic acute myocardial infarction treated by intracoronary catheter aspiration embolectomy in a patient with mechanical aortic valve prosthesis

Author(s):  
Ali Buturak ◽  
Egemen Duygu ◽  
Ekrem Aksu ◽  
Orhan Alper Gungorduk ◽  
Sami Ozgul
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 232470962096356
Author(s):  
Mazin O. Khalid ◽  
Yury Malyshev ◽  
Arsalan Talib Hashmi ◽  
Sabah Siddiqui ◽  
NeelKumar Patel ◽  
...  

The incidence of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT) is around 0.4 per 100 patient-years. Mitral valve thrombosis has a higher incidence than aortic valve thrombosis with a nearly 5-fold increase. Various factors contribute to MVT. The most common cause of valve thrombosis is poor adherence/disruption of anticoagulation therapy. Low cardiac output is known to increase the risk of prosthetic valve thrombosis. Other factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and other patient comorbidities might also play a role. Decreased flow promotes hypercoagulability. Lower pressure in the left atrium (and higher velocities in the left ventricle) can partially contribute to the higher incidence of mitral MVT versus aortic MVT. The presenting symptoms usually depend on the severity of the valve thrombosis; nonobstructive valve thrombosis patients have progressive dyspnea, signs of heart failure, and systemic embolization with strokes being the most common complication. In this article, we present a case of a middle-aged woman with a history of mitral and aortic mechanical prosthesis who presented with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and pulmonary edema due to mechanical aortic valve prosthesis thrombosis. She had an isolated mechanical aortic valve prosthesis thrombosis with intact mitral valve, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not yet been described. We performed a literature review by searching PubMed and Embase using the keywords “mechanical valve,” “thrombosis,” “aortic,” and “mitral,” our search did not show similar cases.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110025
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Konstantinou ◽  
Sven Peterss ◽  
Jan Stana ◽  
Barbara Rantner ◽  
Ramin Banafsche ◽  
...  

Purpose To present a novel technique to successfully cross a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Technique A 55-year-old female patient with genetically verified Marfan syndrome presented with a 5-cm anastomotic aneurysm of the proximal aortic arch after previous ascending aortic replacement due to a type A aortic dissection in 2007. The patient also underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement in 1991. A 3-stage hybrid repair was planned. The first 2 steps included debranching of the supra-aortic vessels. In the third procedure, a custom-made double branched endovascular stent-graft with a short 35-mm introducer tip was implanted. The mechanical valve was passed with the tip of the dilator on the lateral site of the leaflet, without destructing the valve and with only mild symptoms of aortic insufficiency, as one leaflet continued to work. This allowed the implantation of the stent-graft directly distally of the coronary arteries. Postoperative computed tomography angiography showed no endoleaks and patent coronary and supra-aortic vessels. Conclusion Passing a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis at the proper position is feasible and allows adequate endovascular treatment in complex arch anatomy. However, caution should be taken during positioning of the endovascular graft as the tip may potentially damage the valve prosthesis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hellmeier ◽  
Sarah Nordmeyer ◽  
Pavlo Yevtushenko ◽  
Jan Bruening ◽  
Felix Berger ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Patterson ◽  
William R. Davies ◽  
Ronak Rajani ◽  
Simon Redwood ◽  
Christopher Young ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document