scholarly journals Local tumor progression patterns after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 548-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Napoleone ◽  
Ania Z. Kielar ◽  
Rebecca Hibbert ◽  
Sameh Saif ◽  
Benjamin Y.M. Kwan
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjie Fan ◽  
Xiaoyan Wang ◽  
Jiali Qu ◽  
Wei Lu ◽  
Shufeng Xu ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for subcapsular colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs).Materials and MethodsWith the approval of the Institutional Review Board, the clinical data of CLM patients who underwent percutaneous RFA for the first time from August 2010 to August 2020 were continuously collected. All CLMs were divided into subcapsular and non-capsular groups. Baseline characteristic data, technical effectiveness, minimal ablative margin, complications, local tumor progression (LTP), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were analyzed using the t-test or chi-square test. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic factors of LTP.ResultsOne hundred and ninety-nine patients (124 males; mean age, 60.2 years) with 402 CLMs (221 subcapsular; mean size, 16.0 mm) were enrolled in the study. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 93.5% (376/402) of CLMs, with a major complication rate of 5.5%. Compared with non-subcapsular tumors, the minimal ablative margin achieved in subcapsular CLM was smaller (χ2 = -8.047, P < 0.001). With a median follow-up time of 23 months (range, 3−96 months), 37.1% of the tumors had LTP. The estimated cumulative OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 96.1%, 66.0%, and 44.2%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical effectiveness (χ2 = 0.484, P = 0.487), major complications (χ2 = 0.082, P = 0.775), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) (χ2 = 0.881, P = 0.348), and OS (χ2 = 2.874, P = 0.090). Minimal ablative margin, tumor size (≥20 mm), and technical effectiveness were predictors of LTP (all P < 0.05).ConclusionRFA is a safe and effective technique for local tumor control of subcapsular CLMs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303382096366
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Guang-Yuan Zhang ◽  
Li-Chao Xu ◽  
Xin-Hong He ◽  
Hao-Zhe Huang ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of salvage percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Methods: The cohort consisted of 81 patients with 126 colorectal cancer liver metastases who underwent radiofrequency ablation between January 2012 and September 2016. The clinical data and ablation data were retrospectively analyzed. The local tumor progression-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression model. Results: The technique success rate was 99.21%. The primary efficacy rate was 100% at the 1-month follow-up. Minor complications were observed in 2 patients, which recovered within 1 week. The median local tumor progression-free survival time of all patients was 29.8 months. The absence of subsequent chemotherapy was an independent predictor of a shorter local tumor progression-free survival time ( P < 0.001, hazard ratio: 2.823, 95% confidence interval: 1.603, 4.972). The median overall survival time was 26.8 months. A lesion size greater than 3 cm ( P = 0.011, hazard ratio: 2.112, 95% confidence interval: 1.188, 3.754) and the presence of early local tumor progression ( P = 0.011, hazard ratio: 2.352, 95% confidence interval: 1.217, 4.545) were related to a shorter survival time. Conclusions: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is safe in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases refractory from chemotherapy. Subsequent chemotherapy is important to enhance local control. Small lesions and favorable early responses are related to prolonged overall survival.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1981-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Vandenbroucke ◽  
Jef Vandemeulebroucke ◽  
Nico Buls ◽  
Ruedi F. Thoeni ◽  
Johan de Mey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document