scholarly journals Examining soil carbon uncertainty in a global model: response of microbial decomposition to temperature, moisture and nutrient limitation

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 10229-10269
Author(s):  
J.-F. Exbrayat ◽  
A. J. Pitman ◽  
Q. Zhang ◽  
G. Abramowitz ◽  
Y.-P. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Historical Change ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Microbial Decomposition ◽  
Soil C ◽  
System Models ◽  
C And N ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. Reliable projections of future climate require land–atmosphere carbon (C) fluxes to be represented realistically in Earth System Models. There are several sources of uncertainty in how carbon is parameterized in these models. First, while interactions between the C, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles have been implemented in some models, these lead to diverse changes in land–atmosphere fluxes. Second, while the parameterization of soil organic matter decomposition is similar between models, formulations of the control of the soil physical state on microbial activity vary widely. We address these sources uncertainty by implementing three soil moisture (SMRF) and three soil temperature (STRF) respiration functions in an Earth System Model that can be run with three degrees of biogeochemical nutrient limitation (C-only, C and N, and C and N and P). All 27 possible combinations of a SMRF with a STRF and a biogeochemical mode are equilibrated before transient historical (1850–2005) simulations are performed. As expected, implementing N and P limitation reduces the land carbon sink, transforming some regions from net sinks to net sources over the historical period (1850–2005). Differences in the soil C balance implied by the various SMRFs and STRFs also change the sign of some regional sinks. Further, although the absolute uncertainty in global carbon uptake is reduced, the uncertainty due to the SMRFs and STRFs grows relative to the inter-annual variability in net uptake when N and P limitations are added. We also demonstrate that the equilibrated soil C also depend on the shape of the SMRF and STRF. Equilibration using different STRFs and SMRFs and nutrient limitation generates a six-fold range of global soil C that largely mirrors the range in available (17) CMIP5 models. Simulating the historical change in soil carbon therefore critically depends on the choice of STRF, SMRF and nutrient limitation, as it controls the equilibrated state to which transient conditions are applied. This direct effect of the representation of microbial decomposition in Earth System Models adds to recent concerns on the adequacy of these simple representations of very complex soil carbon processes.

scholarly journals Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jianyang Xia ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Kun Huang ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variation ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Soil C ◽  
Global Database ◽  
System Models ◽  
Transit Times ◽  
Negative Linear Correlation ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. One known bias in current Earth system models (ESMs) is the underestimation of global mean soil carbon (C) transit time (τsoil), which quantifies the age of the C atoms at the time they leave the soil. However, it remains unclear where such underestimations are located globally. Here, we constructed a global database of measured τsoil across 187 sites to evaluate results from 12 ESMs. The observations showed that the estimated τsoil was dramatically shorter from the soil incubation studies in the laboratory environment (median = 4 years; interquartile range = 1 to 25 years) than that derived from field in situ measurements (31; 5 to 84 years) with shifts in stable isotopic C (13C) or the stock-over-flux approach. In comparison with the field observations, the multi-model ensemble simulated a shorter median (19 years) and a smaller spatial variation (6 to 29 years) of τsoil across the same site locations. We then found a significant and negative linear correlation between the in situ measured τsoil and mean annual air temperature. The underestimations of modeled τsoil are mainly located in cold and dry biomes, especially tundra and desert. Furthermore, we showed that one ESM (i.e., CESM) has improved its τsoil estimate by incorporation of the soil vertical profile. These findings indicate that the spatial variation of τsoil is a useful benchmark for ESMs, and we recommend more observations and modeling efforts on soil C dynamics in regions limited by temperature and moisture.

scholarly journals Carbon stocks and fluxes in the high latitudes: using site-level data to evaluate Earth system models

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 5143-5169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Chadburn ◽  
Gerhard Krinner ◽  
Philipp Porada ◽  
Annett Bartsch ◽  
Christian Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Vascular Plants ◽  
Carbon Stocks ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Area Index ◽  
System Models ◽  
Soil Carbon Stocks ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. It is important that climate models can accurately simulate the terrestrial carbon cycle in the Arctic due to the large and potentially labile carbon stocks found in permafrost-affected environments, which can lead to a positive climate feedback, along with the possibility of future carbon sinks from northward expansion of vegetation under climate warming. Here we evaluate the simulation of tundra carbon stocks and fluxes in three land surface schemes that each form part of major Earth system models (JSBACH, Germany; JULES, UK; ORCHIDEE, France). We use a site-level approach in which comprehensive, high-frequency datasets allow us to disentangle the importance of different processes. The models have improved physical permafrost processes and there is a reasonable correspondence between the simulated and measured physical variables, including soil temperature, soil moisture and snow. We show that if the models simulate the correct leaf area index (LAI), the standard C3 photosynthesis schemes produce the correct order of magnitude of carbon fluxes. Therefore, simulating the correct LAI is one of the first priorities. LAI depends quite strongly on climatic variables alone, as we see by the fact that the dynamic vegetation model can simulate most of the differences in LAI between sites, based almost entirely on climate inputs. However, we also identify an influence from nutrient limitation as the LAI becomes too large at some of the more nutrient-limited sites. We conclude that including moss as well as vascular plants is of primary importance to the carbon budget, as moss contributes a large fraction to the seasonal CO2 flux in nutrient-limited conditions. Moss photosynthetic activity can be strongly influenced by the moisture content of moss, and the carbon uptake can be significantly different from vascular plants with a similar LAI. The soil carbon stocks depend strongly on the rate of input of carbon from the vegetation to the soil, and our analysis suggests that an improved simulation of photosynthesis would also lead to an improved simulation of soil carbon stocks. However, the stocks are also influenced by soil carbon burial (e.g. through cryoturbation) and the rate of heterotrophic respiration, which depends on the soil physical state. More detailed below-ground measurements are needed to fully evaluate biological and physical soil processes. Furthermore, even if these processes are well modelled, the soil carbon profiles cannot resemble peat layers as peat accumulation processes are not represented in the models. Thus, we identify three priority areas for model development: (1) dynamic vegetation including (a) climate and (b) nutrient limitation effects; (2) adding moss as a plant functional type; and an (3) improved vertical profile of soil carbon including peat processes.

scholarly journals Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jianyang Xia ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Kun Huang ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variation ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Soil C ◽  
Global Database ◽  
System Models ◽  
Transit Times ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. One known bias in current Earth system models (ESMs) is the underestimation of global mean soil carbon (C) transit time (τsoil), which quantifies the mean age of the C atoms at the time they leave the soil. However, it remains unclear where such underestimations are located globally. Here, we constructed a global database of measured τsoil across 187 sites to evaluated results from twelve ESMs. The observations showed that the estimated τsoil was dramatically shorter from the soil incubations studies in the laboratory environment (median as 4 with the interquartile range of 1–25 years) than that derived from field in-situ measurements (31 with 5–84 years) with the shifts of stable isotopic C (13C) or the stock-over-flux approach. In comparison with the field observations, the multi-model ensemble simulated a shorter median (19 years) and a smaller spatial variation (interquartile range of 6–28 years) of τsoil across the same site locations. We then found a significant and negative linear correlation between the in-situ measured τsoil and mean annual air temperature, and the underestimations of modeled τsoil are mainly located in cold and dry biomes especially tundra and desert. Furthermore, we showed that one ESM (i.e., CESM) has improved its τsoil estimate by incorporation of the soil vertical profile. These findings indicate that the spatial variation of τsoil is a useful benchmark for ESMs, and we recommend more observation and modeling efforts on soil C dynamics in hydrothermal limited regions.

scholarly journals Carbon stocks and fluxes in the high latitudes: Using site-level data to evaluate Earth system models

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Chadburn ◽  
Gerhard Krinner ◽  
Philipp Porada ◽  
Annett Bartsch ◽  
Christian Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Vascular Plants ◽  
Carbon Stocks ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Area Index ◽  
System Models ◽  
Soil Carbon Stocks ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. It is important that climate models can accurately simulate the terrestrial carbon cycle in the Arctic, due to the large and potentially labile carbon stocks found in permafrost-affected environments, which can lead to a positive climate feedback, along with the possibility of future carbon sinks from northward expansion of vegetation under climate warming. Here we evaluate the simulation of tundra carbon stocks and fluxes in three land surface schemes that each form part of major Earth System Models (JSBACH, Germany; JULES, UK and ORCHIDEE, France). We use a site-level approach where comprehensive, high-frequency datasets allow us to disentangle the importance of different processes. The models have improved physical permafrost processes and there is a reasonable correspondence between the simulated and measured physical variables, including soil temperature, soil moisture and snow. We show that if the models simulate the correct leaf area index (LAI), the standard C3 photosynthesis schemes produce the correct order of magnitude of carbon fluxes. Therefore, simulating the correct LAI is one of the first priorities. LAI depends quite strongly on climatic variables alone, as we see by the fact that the dynamic vegetation model can simulate most of the differences in LAI between sites, based almost entirely on climate inputs. However, we also identify an influence from nutrient limitation as the LAI becomes too large at some of the more nutrient-limited sites. We conclude that including moss as well as vascular plants is of primary importance to the carbon budget, as moss contributes a large fraction to the seasonal CO2 flux in nutrient-limited conditions. Moss photosynthetic activity can be strongly influenced by the moisture content of moss, and the carbon uptake can be significantly different from vascular plants with similar LAI. The soil carbon stocks depend strongly on the rate of input of carbon from the vegetation to the soil, and our analysis suggests that an improved simulation of photosynthesis would also lead to an improved simulation of soil carbon stocks. However, the stocks are also influenced by soil carbon burial (e.g. through cryoturbation) and the rate of heterotrophic respiration, which depends on the soil physical state. More detailed below-ground measurements are needed to fully evaluate soil biological and physical processes. Furthermore, even if these processes are well modelled, the soil carbon profiles cannot resemble peat layers as peat accumulation processes are not represented in the models. Thus we identify three priority areas for model development: 1. Dynamic vegetation including a. climate and b. nutrient limitation effects. 2. Adding moss as a plant functional type. 3. Improved vertical profile of soil carbon including peat processes.

scholarly journals Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1827-1851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Séférian ◽  
Marion Gehlen ◽  
Laurent Bopp ◽  
Laure Resplandy ◽  
James C. Orr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Biogeochemical Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
System Models ◽  
Marine Biogeochemistry ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. During the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) substantial efforts were made to systematically assess the skill of Earth system models. One goal was to check how realistically representative marine biogeochemical tracer distributions could be reproduced by models. In routine assessments model historical hindcasts were compared with available modern biogeochemical observations. However, these assessments considered neither how close modeled biogeochemical reservoirs were to equilibrium nor the sensitivity of model performance to initial conditions or to the spin-up protocols. Here, we explore how the large diversity in spin-up protocols used for marine biogeochemistry in CMIP5 Earth system models (ESMs) contributes to model-to-model differences in the simulated fields. We take advantage of a 500-year spin-up simulation of IPSL-CM5A-LR to quantify the influence of the spin-up protocol on model ability to reproduce relevant data fields. Amplification of biases in selected biogeochemical fields (O2, NO3, Alk-DIC) is assessed as a function of spin-up duration. We demonstrate that a relationship between spin-up duration and assessment metrics emerges from our model results and holds when confronted with a larger ensemble of CMIP5 models. This shows that drift has implications for performance assessment in addition to possibly aliasing estimates of climate change impact. Our study suggests that differences in spin-up protocols could explain a substantial part of model disparities, constituting a source of model-to-model uncertainty. This requires more attention in future model intercomparison exercises in order to provide quantitatively more correct ESM results on marine biogeochemistry and carbon cycle feedbacks.

Are Earth system models able to reproduce the soil heterotrophic respiration fluxes?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Guenet ◽  
Jérémie Orliac ◽  
Lauric Cécillon ◽  
Olivier Torres ◽  
Laurent Bopp
Keyword(s):  
Soil Respiration ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Heterotrophic Respiration ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Microbial Decomposition ◽  
System Models ◽  
Earth System Models ◽  
Climate Dynamic

<p>Earth system models (ESMs) are numerical representations of the Earth system aiming at representing the climate dynamic including feedbacks between climate and carbon cycle. CO<sub>2</sub> flux due to soil respiration including heterotrophic respiration coming from the soil organic matter (SOM) microbial decomposition and autotrophic respiration coming from the roots respiration is one of the most important flux between the surface and the atmosphere. Thus, even small changes in this flux may impact drastically the climate dynamic. It is therefore essential that ESMs reliably reproduce soil respiration. Until recently, such an evaluation at global scale of the ESMs was not straightforward because of the absence of observation-derived product to evaluate heterotrophic respiration fluxes from ESMs at global scale. Recently, several gridded products were published opening a new research avenue on climate-carbon feedbacks. In this study, we used simulations from 13 ESMs performed within the sixth coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6) and we evaluate their capacities to reproduce the heterotrophic respiration flux using three gridded observation-based products. We first evaluate the total heterotrophic respiration flux for each model as well as the spatial patterns. We observed that most of the models are able to reproduce the total heterotrophic respiration flux but the spatial analysis underlined that this was partially due to some bias compensation between regions overestimating the flux and regions underestimating the flux. To better identify the causes of the identified bias in predicting the total heterotrophic respiration flux, we analysed the residues of ESMs using linear mixed effect models and we observed that lithology and climate were the most important drivers of the ESMs residues. Our results suggest that the response of SOM microbial decomposition to soil moisture and temperature must be improved in the next ESMs generation and that the effect of lithology should be better taken into account.</p>

scholarly journals Causes of variation in soil carbon predictions from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 14437-14473 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. O. Todd-Brown ◽  
J. T. Randerson ◽  
W. M. Post ◽  
F. M. Hoffman ◽  
C. Tarnocai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Carbon Stocks ◽  
Earth System ◽  
System Models ◽  
Soil Database ◽  
Empirical Estimates ◽  
Global Soil ◽  
Soil Carbon Stocks ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. Stocks of soil organic carbon represent a large component of the carbon cycle that may participate in climate change feedbacks, particularly on decadal and century scales. For Earth system models (ESMs), the ability to accurately represent the global distribution of existing soil carbon stocks is a prerequisite for predicting future carbon-climate feedbacks. We compared soil carbon predictions from 16 ESMs to empirical data from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) and Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD). Model estimates of global soil carbon stocks ranged from 510 to 3050 Pg C, compared to an estimate of 890–1660 Pg C from the HWSD. Model predictions for the high latitudes fell between 60 and 800 Pg C, compared to 380–620 Pg C from the NCSCD and 290 Pg C from the HWSD. This 5.3-fold variation in global soil carbon across models compared to a 3.4-fold variation in net primary productivity (NPP) and a 3.8-fold variation in global soil carbon turnover times. The spatial distribution of soil carbon predicted by the ESMs was not well correlated with the HWSD (Pearson's correlations < 0.4, RMSE 9.4 to 22.8 kg C m−2), although model-data agreement generally improved at the biome scale. There was poor agreement between the HWSD and NCSCD datasets in northern latitudes (Pearson's correlation = 0.33), indicating uncertainty in empirical estimates of soil carbon. We found that a reduced complexity model dependent on NPP and soil temperature explained most of the spatial variation in soil carbon predicted by most ESMs (R2 values between 0.73 and 0.93). This result suggests that differences in soil carbon predictions between ESMs are driven primarily by differences in predicted NPP and the parameterization of soil carbon responses to NPP and temperature not by structural differences between the models. Future work should focus on accurately representing these driving variables and modifying model structure to include additional processes.

scholarly journals Model behavior of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: predicting soil carbon dynamics under climate change

Botany ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen K. Treseder
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi ◽  
Mycorrhizal Fungi ◽  
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal ◽  
Am Fungi ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Soil C ◽  
System Models ◽  
Microbial Groups ◽  
Earth System Models

In this commentary, I advocate for more detailed incorporation of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in Earth system models, to improve our projections of global climate change. Current Earth system models display relatively low predictability of soil C stocks, which limit our ability to estimate future climate conditions. A more explicit incorporation of microbial mechanisms can increase the accuracy of ecosystem-scale models that inform the larger-scale Earth system models. Of the numerous microbial groups that can influence soil C dynamics, AM fungi are particularly tractable for integration in models. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are globally abundant and perform critical roles in C cycling, such as augmentation of net primary productivity and soil C storage. Moreover, AM communities exhibit relatively low diversity within ecosystems, compared with other microbial groups. In addition, global datasets of AM ecology are available for use in model development. Thus, AM communities can be readily simulated in next-generation trait-based models that link microbial diversity to ecosystem function. Altogether, we are well-poised to incorporate the dynamics of individual AM taxa in ecosystem models, which can then be coupled to Earth system models. Hopefully, these efforts would advance our ability to predict and plan for future climate change.

scholarly journals Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (26) ◽  
pp. eaba1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald A. Meehl ◽  
Catherine A. Senior ◽  
Veronika Eyring ◽  
Gregory Flato ◽  
Jean-Francois Lamarque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity ◽  
System Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Earth System Models

For the current generation of earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), the range of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, a hypothetical value of global warming at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2) is 1.8°C to 5.6°C, the largest of any generation of models dating to the 1990s. Meanwhile, the range of transient climate response (TCR, the surface temperature warming around the time of CO2 doubling in a 1% per year CO2 increase simulation) for the CMIP6 models of 1.7°C (1.3°C to 3.0°C) is only slightly larger than for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Here we review and synthesize the latest developments in ECS and TCR values in CMIP, compile possible reasons for the current values as supplied by the modeling groups, and highlight future directions. Cloud feedbacks and cloud-aerosol interactions are the most likely contributors to the high values and increased range of ECS in CMIP6.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document