scholarly journals Optimizing models of the North Atlantic spring bloom using physical, chemical and bio-optical observations from a Lagrangian float

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 8477-8520 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Bagniewski ◽  
K. Fennel ◽  
M. J. Perry ◽  
E. A. D'Asaro

Abstract. The North Atlantic spring bloom is one of the main events that lead to carbon export to the deep ocean and drive oceanic uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere. Here we use a suite of physical, bio-optical and chemical measurements made during the 2008 spring bloom to optimize and compare three different models of biological carbon export. The observations are from a Lagrangian float that operated south of Iceland from early April to late June, and were calibrated with ship-based measurements. The simplest model is representative of typical NPZD models used for the North Atlantic, while the most complex model explicitly includes diatoms and the formation of fast sinking diatom aggregates and cysts under silicate limitation. We carried out a variational optimization and error analysis for the biological parameters of all three models, and compared their ability to replicate the observations. The observations were sufficient to constrain most phytoplankton-related model parameters to accuracies of better than 15%. However, the lack of zooplankton observations leads to large uncertainties in model parameters for grazing. The simulated vertical carbon flux at 100 m depth is similar between models and agrees well with available observations, but at 600 m the simulated flux is much larger for the model with diatom aggregation. While none of the models can be formally rejected based on their misfit with the available observations, the model that includes export by diatom aggregation has slightly better fit to the observations and more accurately represents the mechanisms and timing of carbon export based on observations not included in the optimization. Thus models that accurately simulate the upper 100 m do not necessarily accurately simulate export to deeper depths.

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1291-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Bagniewski ◽  
K. Fennel ◽  
M. J. Perry ◽  
E. A. D'Asaro

Abstract. The North Atlantic spring bloom is one of the main events that lead to carbon export to the deep ocean and drive oceanic uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere. Here we use a suite of physical, bio-optical and chemical measurements made during the 2008 spring bloom to optimize and compare three different models of biological carbon export. The observations are from a Lagrangian float that operated south of Iceland from early April to late June, and were calibrated with ship-based measurements. The simplest model is representative of typical NPZD models used for the North Atlantic, while the most complex model explicitly includes diatoms and the formation of fast sinking diatom aggregates and cysts under silicate limitation. We carried out a variational optimization and error analysis for the biological parameters of all three models, and compared their ability to replicate the observations. The observations were sufficient to constrain most phytoplankton-related model parameters to accuracies of better than 15 %. However, the lack of zooplankton observations leads to large uncertainties in model parameters for grazing. The simulated vertical carbon flux at 100 m depth is similar between models and agrees well with available observations, but at 600 m the simulated flux is larger by a factor of 2.5 to 4.5 for the model with diatom aggregation. While none of the models can be formally rejected based on their misfit with the available observations, the model that includes export by diatom aggregation has a statistically significant better fit to the observations and more accurately represents the mechanisms and timing of carbon export based on observations not included in the optimization. Thus models that accurately simulate the upper 100 m do not necessarily accurately simulate export to deeper depths.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Louropoulou ◽  
Martha Gledhill ◽  
Thomas J. Browning ◽  
Dhwani K. Desai ◽  
Jan-Lukas Menzel Barraqueta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Goris ◽  
Jerry Tjiputra ◽  
Are Ohlsen ◽  
Jörg Schwinger ◽  
Siv Lauvset ◽  
...  

<p>As one of the major carbon sinks in the global ocean, the North Atlantic is a key player in mediating and ameliorating the ongoing global warming. Projections of the North Atlantic carbon sink in a high-CO<sub>2</sub> future vary greatly among models, with some showing that a slowdown in carbon uptake has already begun and others predicting that this slowdown will not occur until nearly 2100.</p><p>Discrepancies among models largely originate because of differences in the efficiency of the high-latitude transport of carbon from the surface to the deep ocean. This transport occurs through biological production, deep convection and subsequent transport via the deep western boundary current. For an ensemble of 11 CMIP5-models, we studied the efficiency of this transport and identified two indicators of contemporary model behavior that are highly correlated with a model´s projected future carbon-uptake. The first indicator is the high latitude summer pCO<sub>2</sub><sup>sea</sup>-anomaly of a model, which is tightly linked to winter mixing and nutrient supply, but also to deep convection. The second indicator is the fraction of the anthropogenic carbon-inventory stored below 1000-m depth, indicating how efficient carbon is transported into the deep ocean. By comparing to the observational database, these indicators allow us to better constrain the model ensemble, and demonstrate that the models with more efficient surface to deep transport are best aligned with current observations. These models also show the largest future North Atlantic carbon uptake, which we then conclude is the more plausible future evolution. We further study if the high correlations between our contemporary indicators and a model´s future North Atlantic carbon uptake is also upheld for the next model generation, CMIP6. We hypothesize that this is the case and that our indicators can not only help us to constrain the CMIP6 model ensemble but also inform us about progress made between CMIP5 and CMIP6 in terms of North Atlantic carbon uptake, winter mixing, nutrient supply, deep convection and transport of carbon into the deep ocean.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (9) ◽  
pp. 6121-6139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Alkire ◽  
Craig Lee ◽  
Eric D'Asaro ◽  
Mary Jane Perry ◽  
Nathan Briggs ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 440 ◽  
pp. 267-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Visser ◽  
KL Hartman ◽  
GJ Pierce ◽  
VD Valavanis ◽  
J Huisman

1992 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1707-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bender ◽  
Hugh Ducklow ◽  
John Kiddon ◽  
John Marra ◽  
John Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document