Evaluation of convective cloud microphysics in numerical weather predictionmodel with dual-wavelength polarimetric radar observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Köcher ◽  
Florian Ewald ◽  
Martin Hagen ◽  
Christoph Knote ◽  
Eleni Tetoni ◽  
...  

<p>The representation of microphysical processes in numerical weather prediction models remains a main source of uncertainty until today. To evaluate the influence of cloud microphysics parameterizations on numerical weather prediction, a convection permitting regional weather model setup has been established using 5 different microphysics schemes of varying complexity (double-moment, spectral bin, particle property prediction (P3)). A polarimetric radar forward operator (CR-SIM) has been applied to simulate radar signals consistent with the simulated particles. The performance of the microphysics schemes is analyzed through a statistical comparison of the simulated radar signals to radar measurements on a dataset of 30 convection days.</p> <p>The observational data basis is provided by two polarimetric research radar systems in the area of Munich, Germany, at C- and Ka-band frequencies and a complementary third polarimetric C-band radar operated by the German Weather Service. By measuring at two different frequencies, the<br />dual-wavelength ratio is derived that facilitates the investigation of the particle size evolution. Polarimetric radars provide in-cloud information about hydrometeor type and asphericity by measuring, e.g., the differential reflectivity ZDR.</p> <p>Within the DFG Priority Programme 2115 PROM, we compare the simulated polarimetric and dual-wavelength radar signals with radar observations of convective clouds. Deviations are found between the schemes and observations in ice and liquid phase, related to the treatment of particle size distributions. Apart from the P3 scheme, simulated reflectivities in the ice phase are too high. Dual-wavelength signatures demonstrate issues of most schemes to correctly represent ice particle size distributions. Comparison of polarimetric radar signatures reveal issues of all schemes except the spectral bin scheme to correctly represent rain particle size distributions. The polarimetric information is further exploited by applying a hydrometeor classification algorithm to obtain dominant hydrometeor classes. By comparing the simulated and observed distribution of hydrometeors, as well as the frequency, intensity and area of high impact weather situations (e.g., hail or heavy convective precipitation), the influence of cloud microphysics on the ability to correctly predict high impact weather situations is examined.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Köcher ◽  
Tobias Zinner ◽  
Christoph Knote ◽  
Eleni Tetoni ◽  
Florian Ewald ◽  
...  

Abstract. The representation of cloud microphysical processes contributes substantially to the uncertainty of numerical weather simulations. In part, this is owed to some fundamental knowledge gaps in the underlying processes due to the difficulty to observe them directly. On the path to close these gaps we present a setup for the systematic characterization of differences between numerical weather model and radar observations for convective weather situations. Radar observations are introduced which provide targeted dual-wavelength and polarimetric measurements of convective clouds with the potential to provide more detailed information about hydrometeor shapes and sizes. A convection permitting regional weather model setup is established using 5 different microphysics schemes (double-moment, spectral bin (FSBM), and particle property prediction (P3)). Observations are compared to hindcasts which are created with a polarimetric radar forward simulator for all measurement days. A cell-tracking algorithm applied to radar and model data facilitates comparison on a cell object basis. Statistical comparisons of radar observations and numerical weather model runs are presented on a dataset of 30 convection days. In general, simulations show too few weak and small-scale convective cells. Contoured frequency by altitude distributions of radar signatures reveal deviations between the schemes and observations in ice and liquid phase. Apart from the P3 scheme, simulated reflectivities in the ice phase are too high. Dual-wavelength signatures demonstrate issues of most schemes to correctly represent ice particle size distributions, producing overly large graupel particles. Comparison of polarimetric radar signatures reveal issues of all schemes except the FSBM to correctly represent rain particle size distributions.


Author(s):  
Sergey Y. Matrosov

AbstractDual-frequency millimeter-wavelength radar observations in snowfall are analyzed in order to evaluate differences in conventional polarimetric radar variables such as differential reflectivity, ZDR, specific differential phase shift, KDP, and linear depolarization ratio, LDR, at traditional cloud radar frequencies at Ka- and W-bands (~35 and ~94 GHz, correspondingly). Low radar beam elevation (~5°) measurements were performed at Oliktok Point, Alaska with a scanning fully polarimetric radar operating in the horizontal-vertical polarization basis. This radar has the same gate spacing and very close beam widths at both frequencies, which largely alleviates uncertainties associated with spatial and temporal data matching. It is shown that observed Ka- and W-band ZDR differences are, on average, less than about 0.5 dB and do not have a pronounced trend as a function of snowfall reflectivity. The observed ZDR differences agree well with modeling results obtained using integration over non-spherical ice particle size distributions. For higher signal-to-noise ratios, KDP data derived from differential phase measurements are approximately scaled as reciprocals of corresponding radar frequencies indicating that the influence of non-Rayleigh scattering effects on this variable is rather limited. This result is also in satisfactory agreement with data obtained by modeling using realistic particle size distributions. Observed Ka- and W-band LDR differences are strongly affected by the radar hardware system polarization “leak” and are generally less than 4 dB. Smaller differences are observed for higher depolarizations, where the polarization “leak” is less pronounced. Realistic assumptions about particle canting and the system polarization isolation lead to modeling results that satisfactorily agree with observational dual-frequency LDR data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-754
Author(s):  
Guifu Zhang ◽  
Jidong Gao ◽  
Muyun Du

AbstractMany weather radar networks in the world have now provided polarimetric radar data (PRD) that have the potential to improve our understanding of cloud and precipitation microphysics, and numerical weather prediction (NWP). To realize this potential, an accurate and efficient set of polarimetric observation operators are needed to simulate and assimilate the PRD with an NWP model for an accurate analysis of the model state variables. For this purpose, a set of parameterized observation operators are developed to simulate and assimilate polarimetric radar data from NWP model-predicted hydrometeor mixing ratios and number concentrations of rain, snow, hail, and graupel. The polarimetric radar variables are calculated based on the T-matrix calculation of wave scattering and integrations of the scattering weighted by the particle size distribution. The calculated polarimetric variables are then fitted to simple functions of water content and volume-weighted mean diameter of the hydrometeor particle size distribution. The parameterized PRD operators are applied to an ideal case and a real case predicted by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to have simulated PRD, which are compared with existing operators and real observations to show their validity and applicability. The new PRD operators use less than one percent of the computing time of the old operators to complete the same simulations, making it efficient in PRD simulation and assimilation usage.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K. Ellis ◽  
R. Buchan ◽  
M. Hoover ◽  
J. Martyny ◽  
B. Bucher-Bartleson ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (10/11) ◽  
pp. 577-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko FURUKAWA ◽  
Yuichi OHIRA ◽  
Eiji OBATA ◽  
Yutaka YOSHIDA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document