Investigation of Land Subsidence in Eastern Thrace (Turkey) using Multi Temporal InSAR

Author(s):  
Tohid Nozadkhalil ◽  
Semih Ergintav ◽  
Ziyadin Cakir ◽  
Ugur Dogan ◽  
Thomas R. Walter

<p>Westward migration of M>7 earthquakes along North Anatolian fault with the latest one, Izmit 1999 event, led focus of studies to the seismic gap in the main Marmara fault. For this purpose, the coastal ranges of the Marmara Sea, mainly Istanbul megacity, are renowned for earthquake and ground motion hazards, associated with faulting, landslides and sediment compaction processes. Ground motion associated with man-made activities, however, have been barely studied. The Thrace region of Turkey, some 50 km to the North of the Marmara Sea, expresses pronounced ground motions affecting large areas. We use the Persistent InSAR technique to monitor the Marmara region using Sentinel-1 satellites’ TOPSAR data between 2014 and 2020. Results for both ascending (T131 and T58) and descending (T36) tracks reveals 10 mm/yr rate of subsidence in the Thrace region of Turkey, affecting an area ~15400km² with dimensions of ~110 km by ~140 km. There are two plausible mechanisms for this deformation; (1) excessive pumping of groundwater for agricultural purposes, or (2) natural gas extraction activities taking place in the region. To better understand the observed deformation source, as a first step, we model potential gas extraction by volume change. No piezometric data are available for this region for the time being. Thick sediments including sandstone, reefal carbonates, amongst others, are aimed for gas exploration in the Thrace basin for more than half century. Depth of gas extraction wells and sediment thickness is compiled from previous studies to compare the subsided area with sediment and well depth variations. </p><p>We use  the Poly3D boundary element method to model the surface. Poly3D uses planar triangular elements of constant model to model displacement’s source. Using triangular elements provides models with complex and smooth 3D surfaces avoiding overlaps or gaps, and hence allowing one to construct realistic models. Poly3dinv inverse model applies a fast non-negative/non-positive least squares solver to optimize the solution. We construct a surface enveloping tips of the wells and use it to produce deformation at surface due by allowing opening on it. Small residuals between the observation and model based on opening suggests that deformation is likely caused by natural gas extraction.</p>

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Littlefield ◽  
Selina Roman-White ◽  
Dan Augustine ◽  
Ambica Pegallapati ◽  
George G. Zaimes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aracely Maldonado-Torres ◽  
Sandra Grisell Mora Ravelo ◽  
Eduardo Osorio Hernández ◽  
Angeluz Olvera Velona ◽  
José Alberto López Santillán ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 20-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Orem ◽  
Calin Tatu ◽  
Matthew Varonka ◽  
Harry Lerch ◽  
Anne Bates ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyhan Okuyan Akcan ◽  
Can Zulfikar

<p>Marmara region located on the western end of the North Anatolian Fault Zone is a tectonically active region in Turkey. There have been frequent severe earthquakes in the region and will continue to occur. There was no serious earthquake in the region after the 1999 Mw7.4 Kocaeli and Mw7.2 Düzce earthquakes. A Marmara Sea offshore earthquake Mw5.8 close to Silivri Town of Istanbul Metropolitan City has occurred on September 26, 2019 daytime at 13:59. The earthquake happened at the coordinate of 40.87N – 28.19E with a depth of 7.0km on the Kumburgaz segment of the North Anatolian Fault line. It was felt in almost all Marmara region. In some settlements in Istanbul City, slight to moderate damages were observed. A foreshock earthquake of Mw4.8 occurred on the same segment on 24 September, 2019. 150 aftershock events ranging from M1.0 to M4.1 have been recorded within the 24 hours after the mainshock. The ground motions have been recorded in the region by the several institutions including AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), KOERI (Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute) and IGDAS (Istanbul Gas Distribution Industry and Trade Inc.). The ground motion records and selected parameters have been examined in this study. The ground motion parameters (MMI, PGA, PGV, Sa, Sv, Sd) distribution have been achieved and checked by the recent NGA-West2 ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs); ASK2014, CY2014 and BSSA2014. The compatibility of the GMPEs for a moderate size Marmara Sea earthquake has been examined.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 3597-3599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Fontenot ◽  
Zacariah L. Hildenbrand ◽  
Doug D. Carlton ◽  
Jayme L. Walton ◽  
Kevin A. Schug

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document