Paleofire, Vegetation, and Climate Reconstructions of the Middle to Late Holocene From Lacustrine Sediments of the Toushe Basin, Taiwan

Author(s):  
Chunmei Ma ◽  
Zhenhui Huang

<p>We identified four climatic stages between 6.2 and 1.3 cal kyr before present (BP) based on pollen and charcoal concentrations by high‐resolution Accelerated mass spectrometer (AMS) <sup>14</sup> C‐dated sediment profile from Taiwan's Toushe Basin. From 6.2 to 4.6 cal kyr BP, the region was warm‐wet with infrequent wildfires and dominant subtropical evergreen broad‐leaved forests. The climate was cooler‐drier from 4.6 to 3.0 cal kyr BP, with a decline in forest and increased fire frequency. From 3.0 to 2.1 cal kyr BP,climate further cooled and dried, with the development of alpine meadows and higher fire frequency. The region became warmer and wetter from 2.1 to 1.3 cal kyr BP, accompanied by forest recovery. Climatic changes were linked to changes in East Asia Summer Monsoon intensity,which is mainly controlled by solar radiation. Wildfires were likely controlled by precipitation variability that is influenced by East Asia Summer Monsoon and El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Toushe Basin experienced drought conditions and frequent wildfires during the El Niño years.</p>

2021 ◽  
Vol 274 ◽  
pp. 107267
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Wanyin Qiu ◽  
Xiuyang Jiang ◽  
Hsun-Ming Hu ◽  
Haiyan Xiao ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 749-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Hon Lau ◽  
An-Yu Wang ◽  
Ying-Hwa Kuo ◽  
Shou-Jun Chen ◽  
Jimy Dudhia

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (14) ◽  
pp. 5503-5521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gangiredla Srinivas ◽  
Jasti S. Chowdary ◽  
Chellappan Gnanaseelan ◽  
Anant Parekh ◽  
Ramu Dandi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengyu Liu ◽  
Xinyu Wen ◽  
E.C. Brady ◽  
B. Otto-Bliesner ◽  
Ge Yu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (13) ◽  
pp. 1553-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
HaiWen Liu ◽  
TianJun Zhou ◽  
YuXiang Zhu ◽  
YiHua Lin

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 3864-3875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Wang ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Tianjun Zhou ◽  
Zhiwei Wu

Abstract The current seasonal prediction of East Asia (EA) summer monsoon deals with June–July–August (JJA) mean anomalies. This study shows that the EA summer monsoon may be divided into early summer [May–June (MJ)] and late summer [July–August (JA)] and exhibits remarkable differences in mean state between MJ and JA. This study reveals that the principal modes of interannual precipitation variability have distinct spatial and temporal structures during the early and late summer. These principal modes can be categorized as either El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) related or non-ENSO related. During the period of 1979–2007, ENSO-related modes explain 35% of MJ variance and 45% of JA variance, and non-ENSO-related modes account for 25% of MJ variance and 20% of JA variance. For ENSO-related variance, about two-thirds are associated with ENSO decaying phases, and one-third is associated with ENSO developing phases. The ENSO-related MJ modes generally concur with rapid decay or early development of ENSO episodes, and the opposite tends to apply to ENSO-related JA modes. The non-ENSO MJ mode is preceded by anomalous land surface temperatures over southern China during the previous March and April. The non-ENSO JA mode is preceded by lasting equatorial western Pacific (the Niño-4 region) warming from the previous winter through late summer. The results suggest that 1) prediction of bimonthly (MJ) and (JA) anomalies may be useful, 2) accurate prediction of the detailed evolution of ENSO is critical for prediction of ENSO-related bimonthly rainfall anomalies over East Asia, and 3) non-ENSO-related modes are of paramount importance during ENSO neutral years. Further establishment of the physical linkages between the non-ENSO modes and their corresponding precursors may provide additional sources for EA summer monsoon prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document