scholarly journals Responsibilism and the Analytic-Sociological Debate in Social Epistemology

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Dieleman

This is the second paper in the invited collection. Dieleman provides an overview of the “state-of-the-field” debate between Analytic Social Epistemology (ASE), represented by Alvin Goldman, and what Dieleman calls the Sociological Social Epistemology (SSE), represented by Steve Fuller. In response to this ongoing debate, this paper has two related and complementary objectives. The first is to show that the debate between analytic and sociological versions of social epistemology is overly simplistic and doesn’t take into account additional positions that are available and, indeed, have been available since social epistemology was (re)introduced in the mid to late 1980s. The second is to uncover and tell a story of how Lorraine Code’s Epistemic Responsibility is one such additional position. Looking to Code's Epistemic Responsibility reveals the artificiality of the debate between analytic and sociological social epistemologists.

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naditn Rouhana ◽  
Asʿad Ghanem

The vast majority of states in the international system, democratic and non-democratic, are multi-ethnic (Gurr 1993). A liberal-democratic multi-ethnic state serves the collective needs of all its citizens regardless of their ethnic affiliation, and citizenship—legally recognized membership in the political structure called a state—is the single criterion for belonging to the state and for granting equal opportunity to all members of the system. Whether a multi-ethnic democratic state should provide group rights above and beyond individual legal equality is an ongoing debate (Gurr & Harff 1994).


1968 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Grabar

Like most other fields, the study of Islamic art is both the beneficiary and the victim of its own past. Like many fields, it is affected in various more or less successful ways by developments and needs in related areas of learning. Like all fields, it is tied to the quality and idiosyncrasies of the men who practice it. Inasmuch as bibliographical surveys according to traditional lines of techniques and periods are available (Pearson, Index Islamicus with supplements, London, 1958, 1962, 1968; especially K.A.C. Creswell, A Bibliography of the Architecture, Arts and Crafts of Islam, Cairo, 1961) and current works are listed with a fair degree of completeness in the yearly Abstracta Islamica published by the Revue des Etudes Islamiques, my concern in this paper will be to review the state of the field, the ways in which one can find out about it, and the work being done according to three major categories: traditional techniques and documentation; new problems and solutions; light and dark areas of research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf Kolditz ◽  
Leslie A Jakobs ◽  
Ernst Huenges ◽  
Thomas Kohl

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-142
Author(s):  
Yousun Chung ◽  
Sun Wook Chung ◽  
Young Hee Chang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alice Staveley

‘Yet I’m the only woman in England free to write what I like. The others must be thinking of series’ & editors.’ Woolf’s 1925 homage to the impact of the Hogarth Press on her career is well known, signifying a new sense of herself as a woman writer in command of the means of creative production. Less well known is how pervasive were her private and public negotiations with the narratological implications of the feminist materialism she cultivated as a printer and publisher. This article reviews the state of the field, re-reads her early short fiction in the context of her typesetting experiments, which resonate with the conflicted history of women in the printing trades, and argues for a revisionist understanding of Woolf’s feminist modernism as isomorphic with the Hogarth Press.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-121
Author(s):  
KATHERINE BOWERS ◽  
KATE HOLLAND
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Esther J. Calzada ◽  
Lauren E. Gulbas ◽  
Carolina Hausmann-Stabile ◽  
Su Yeong Kim ◽  
Jodi Berger Cardoso

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document