scholarly journals Keyword Surveillance and the Development of Evolving Reporting in Austin, Texas

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley N. Hawes

ObjectiveAustin Public Health's Public Health Emergency Preparedness program utilizes a variety of tools and resources to create informative, event-specific, and engaging syndromic surveillance reports to share 1) internally within Austin Public Health; 2) with City of Austin and Travis County partners; 3) local health care coalition members; and 4) the public during events that affect the Austin, Texas metropolitan area.IntroductionAustin Public Health creates a variety of syndromic surveillance reports for events throughout the Austin, Texas metropolitan area. These events range from responses to major disasters such as the 2017 Hurricane Harvey sheltering to ongoing special event monitoring such as University of Texas football games and the Austin City Limits music festival. Partnerships within the Austin metropolitan region are crucial to ensuring the information-sharing necessary to create robust reports, as well as during the follow-up process of requesting feedback from partners on the usefulness of the reports. Austin Public Health's Public Health Emergency Preparedness program utilizes a variety of tools and resources to create informative, event-specific, and engaging reports, fulfilling multiple reporting needs for all partners.MethodsThe process of generating syndromic surveillance reports begins by keyword surveillance of hospital emergency room chief complaint data. Keywords are keyed into the Austin metropolitan area's hospital free-text chief complaints via the Capital Area Public Health and Medical Coalition. The searchable keywords are queried to create a baseline picture of an evolving event. Data are also requested and gathered from multiple partners including local news stations, the National Weather Service, the City of Austin’s Office of Vital Records (birth and death certificates), social media platforms, Austin 3-1-1, and Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services. All data are then analyzed, visualized and displayed in reports that are distributed via multiple platforms including email, social media, governmental websites, Geographic Information System (GIS) storymaps, and WebEOC. Reports are then combined into event end summaries. Accompanying the final summary report are feedback surveys.ResultsThe ability to request keywords in an open communication pathway between hospitals, the Capital Area Public Health and Medical Coalition, and the local health department has bolstered area partnerships. Previous surveillance reports have been reported to be both useful and beneficial to departmental, community and health coalition partners. For example, the 2017 report following Hurricane Harvey was used by local hospitals for planning staffing and surge needs, and the 2018 heat report is being used to determine the placement of future cooling stations at special events. A 2019 surveillance report on dockless scooter injuries will be used to inform risk factors and trauma injury severity. Requested changes from partners have included: the addition of graphs, keyword-specific changes, inclusion of social media and broadcast media data, and the use of information from other partners to create a final event or year-end summary report.ConclusionsKeyword surveillance of hospital chief complaint data and of other local real-time data are innovative tools to creating meaningful syndromic surveillance reports that provide situational awareness and are adaptable to the needs of events and situations in the area. The development and evolution of these syndromic surveillance reports has helped to build a rapidly deployable syndromic surveillance system that can provide key data for preparing for and responding to future disaster events. By engaging local and regional partners in an iterative process for developing these reports, APH ensures ongoing improvement, thereby providing more powerful and useful reports to all partners involved. 

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Evidence-based decision-making is central to public health. Implementing evidence-informed actions is most challenging during a public health emergency as in an epidemic, when time is limited, scientific uncertainties and political pressures tend to be high, and irrefutable evidence may be lacking. The process of including evidence in public health decision-making and for evidence-informed policy, in preparation, and during public health emergencies, is not systematic and is complicated by many barriers as the absences of shared tools and approaches for evidence-based preparedness and response planning. Many of today's public health crises are also cross-border, and countries need to collaborate in a systematic and standardized way in order to enhance interoperability and to implement coordinated evidence-based response plans. To strengthen the impact of scientific evidence on decision-making for public health emergency preparedness and response, it is necessary to better define mechanisms through which interdisciplinary evidence feeds into decision-making processes during public health emergencies and the context in which these mechanisms operate. As a multidisciplinary, standardized and evidence-based decision-making tool, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) represents and approach that can inform public health emergency preparedness and response planning processes; it can also provide meaningful insights on existing preparedness structures, working as bridge between scientists and decision-makers, easing knowledge transition and translation to ensure that evidence is effectively integrated into decision-making contexts. HTA can address the link between scientific evidence and decision-making in public health emergencies, and overcome the key challenges faced by public health experts when advising decision makers, including strengthening and accelerating knowledge transfer through rapid HTA, improving networking between actors and disciplines. It may allow a 360° perspective, providing a comprehensive view to decision-making in preparation and during public health emergencies. The objective of the workshop is to explore and present how HTA can be used as a shared and systematic evidence-based tool for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, in order to enable stakeholders and decision makers taking actions based on the best available evidence through a process which is systematic and transparent. Key messages There are many barriers and no shared mechanisms to bring evidence in decision-making during public health emergencies. HTA can represent the tool to bring evidence-informed actions in public health emergency preparedness and response.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (S2) ◽  
pp. S117-S117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Nonkin Avchen ◽  
Tanya Telfair LeBlanc ◽  
Christine Kosmos

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Limpakarnjanarat ◽  
Rw Linkins ◽  
E Emerson ◽  
WL Aldis ◽  
C Jiraphongsa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s20-s20
Author(s):  
Alexa Caturay ◽  
Tracey O’Sullivan ◽  
Jennifer Gibson ◽  
Alison Thompson ◽  
Yasmin Khan

Introduction:With increasing disaster risks from extreme weather, climate change, and emerging infectious diseases, the public health system plays a crucial role in community health protection. The disproportionate impacts of disaster risks demonstrate the need to consider ethics and values in public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) activities. Established PHEP frameworks from many countries do not integrate ethics into operational approaches.Aim:To explore the ethical dimensions of all-hazards public health emergency preparedness in Canada.Methods:A qualitative study design was employed to explore key questions relating to PHEP. Six focus groups, using the Structured Interview Matrix (SIM) format, were held across Canada with 130 experts from local, provincial, or federal levels, with an emphasis on local/regional public health. An inductive approach to content analysis was used to develop emergent themes, and iteratively examined based on the literature. This paper presents analyses examining the dimensions of ethics and values that emerged from the focus group discussions.Results:Thematic analysis resulted in the identification of four themes. The themes highlight the importance of proactive consideration of values in PHEP planning: challenges in balancing competing priorities, the need for transparency around decision-making, and consideration for how emergencies impact both individuals and communities.Discussion:Lack of consideration for the ethical dimensions of PHEP in operational frameworks can have important implications for communities. If decisions are made ad-hoc during an evolving emergency situation, the ethical implications may increase the risk for some populations, and lead to compromised trust in the PHEP system. The key findings from this study may be useful in influencing PHEP practice and policy to incorporate fairness and values at the core of PHEP to ensure readiness for emergencies with community health impacts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document