DIFFERENCES IN PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO THE INTENSITY OF MENTAL STRESS

1. Seven latent hypertensive patients and seven matched controls were subjected to standardized mental stress and orthostatic provocation. 2. Mental stress increased blood pressure by approximately 25%, heart rate by 25 beats/min, plasma glycerol by 50% and plasma cyclic AMP by 25% in both groups. Plasma glucose and renin activity were unchanged. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline were essentially unchanged during stress. 3. There was an insignificant tendency towards higher noradrenaline levels in latent hypertensive subjects and two of these subjects displayed an exaggerated noradrenaline response to standing. 4. Our results indicate that the physiological responses to mental stress are caused by selective neuronal activation, rather than by generalized sympatho-adrenal activation. Latent hypertension does not seem to be associated with adrenergic hyperactivity or receptor supersensitivity, except possibly in individual cases.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Study of Ambulatory Monitoring of Physiological Responses under Mental Stress in Daily Life Using a Digital Biosignal Memory Device

Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers ◽

10.9746/sicetr1965.32.628 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 32 (5) ◽

pp. 628-636

Author(s):

Yoshiyuki HABU ◽

Masaaki MAKIKAWA ◽

Ken ISHIHARA

Keyword(s):

Mental Stress ◽

Daily Life ◽

Physiological Responses ◽

Ambulatory Monitoring ◽

Memory Device ◽

Preliminary Study

Download Full-text

Misophonia: An Evidence-Based Case Report

American Journal of Audiology ◽

10.1044/2020_aja-19-00111 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 29 (4) ◽

pp. 685-690

Author(s):

C. S. Vanaja ◽

Miriam Soni Abigail

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Case Report ◽

Case History ◽

Pure Tone ◽

Physiological Responses ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Management Option ◽

Pure Tone Audiogram

Purpose Misophonia is a sound tolerance disorder condition in certain sounds that trigger intense emotional or physiological responses. While some persons may experience misophonia, a few patients suffer from misophonia. However, there is a dearth of literature on audiological assessment and management of persons with misophonia. The purpose of this report is to discuss the assessment of misophonia and highlight the management option that helped a patient with misophonia. Method A case study of a 26-year-old woman with the complaint of decreased tolerance to specific sounds affecting quality of life is reported. Audiological assessment differentiated misophonia from hyperacusis. Management included retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy based on the principles described by P. J. Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2014). A misophonia questionnaire was administered at regular intervals to monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Results A detailed case history and audiological evaluations including pure-tone audiogram and Johnson Hyperacusis Index revealed the presence of misophonia. The patient benefitted from intervention, and the scores of the misophonia questionnaire indicated a decrease in the severity of the problem. Conclusions It is important to differentially diagnose misophonia and hyperacusis in persons with sound tolerance disorders. Retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy can help patients who suffer from misophonia.

Download Full-text