Design, Development and Implementation of µSPC Phantom for Quality Control in Micro-SPECT / CT and Micro-PET / CT Systems - Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Novak

This thesis presents a taxonomy of expert elevator and amusement device inspector knowledge that was developed using task and cognitive task analysis. While literature concerning research into quality control inspection exists, very little research has been performed into safety inspection. A qualitative study captured the knowledge used by elevator and amusement device inspection. The existence of expert performance in the elevator and amusement device inspection domains was identified and a taxonomy of expert inspector knowledge was created. This taxonomy was based on a model of knowledge that distinguishes between three types of knowledge - declarative, procedural, and strategic. Further development of this taxonomy, along with an effort to perform expert inspector knowledge capture, is expected to lead to improved inspector training and performance, and an increase in consistency between the inspections performed by all inspectors.


Author(s):  
Miri Weiss Cohen ◽  
John A. Kennedy ◽  
Archil Pirmisashvili ◽  
Gleb Orlikov

This paper describes an automatic system for analyzing phantom images from two types of PET/CT scanners. The system was developed for the purpose of obtaining tomographic image quality parameters, which determine a number of different performance parameters, primarily scanner sensitivity, tomographic uniformity, contrast and spatial resolution. The system provides a method for generating and altering image masks used for the analysis of PET images, which are then automatically aligned with the PET data. The system automatically generates Quality Control (QC) reports and is currently being used at clinical PET/CT center.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6Part3) ◽  
pp. 2659-2659
Author(s):  
G El Fakhri ◽  
R Fulton ◽  
J Gray ◽  
M Marengo ◽  
B Zimmerman ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6Part4) ◽  
pp. 2452-2452 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kwang ◽  
B Lee ◽  
J Choe

10.2196/10978 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e10978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najeebullah Soomro ◽  
Meraj Chhaya ◽  
Mariam Soomro ◽  
Naukhez Asif ◽  
Emily Saurman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-55
Author(s):  
Hatem Besbes ◽  
Radhia Besbes Krid ◽  
Bassel Solaiman
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
G. Guibert ◽  
C. Tamburella ◽  
S. Tual ◽  
L. Do Carmo ◽  
G. Amzalag ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (06) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bergmann ◽  
B. Geist ◽  
M. Schaffarich ◽  
A. Hirtl ◽  
M. Hacker ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: To gather information on clinical operations, quality control (QC) standards and adoption of guidelines for FDG-PET/CT imaging in Austrian PET/CT centres. Methods: A written survey composed of 68 questions related to A) PET/CT centre and installation, B) standard protocol parameters for FDG-PET/CT imaging of oncology patients, and C) standard QC procedures was conducted between November and December 2013 among all Austrian PET/CT centres. In addition, a NEMA-NU2 2012 image quality phantom test was performed using standard whole-body imaging settings on all PET/CT systems with a lesion-to- background ratio of 4. Recovery coefficients (RC) were calculated for each lesion and PET/ CT system. Resu lts: A) 13 PET/CT systems were installed in 12 nuclear medicine departments at public hospitals. B) Average fasting prior to FDG-PET/CT was 7.6 (4-12) h. All sites measured blood glucose levels while using different cut-off levels (64%: 150 mg/dl). Weight- based activity injection was performed at 83% sites with a mean FDG activity of 4.1 MBq/kg. Average FDG uptake time was 55 (45-75) min. All sites employed CT contrast agents (variation from 1 %-95% of the patients). All sites reported SUV-max. C) Frequency of QC tests varied significantly and QC phantom measurements revealed significant differences in RCs. Conclusion: Significant variations in FDG-PET/CT protocol parameters among all Austrian PET/CT users were observed. subsequently, efforts need to be put in place to further standardize imaging protocols. At a minimum clinical PET/CT operations should ensure compliance with existing guidelines. Further, standardized QC procedures must be followed to improve quantitative accuracy across PET/CT centres.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document