scholarly journals Access to Optimal Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer: A Patient Perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. maapoc.0000014
Author(s):  
Chris Curtis

Introduction Head and neck cancer is a life-changing disease affecting all aspects in the life of a patient; eating, swallowing, talking, and socializing become very hard to deal with and comprehensive support is essential, regardless of the person's gender, age, social status, or background. The aim of this article is to describe the journey of a patient from a clinical and personal perspective, while discussing the importance of timely access to the most appropriate treatment based on outcome and on the patient's quality of life. Case presentation The journey of a head and neck cancer patient is illustrated from his own perspective. The clinical case also highlights a few key issues on medicine access. First, it has been a long time since any new treatment or drugs have been available to treat head and neck cancer patients, although the scenario might change drastically due to the introduction of immunotherapy. Second, it is unusual that even the most caring health care professional would consider a treatment that is not licensed in their country, even if it would have made a significantly positive difference to the patient's quality of life. Conclusions The increasing patient and health care professional's awareness of a solution to their problem with the use of unlicensed treatment, and the decreasing burden linked to identifying and sourcing unlicensed treatment, should help to optimize the management of these patients and significantly impact the outcome and their quality of life.

2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 1352-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Reid ◽  
C Hicks ◽  
S Herron-Marx ◽  
S Parmar

AbstractAim:To investigate whether information about the size of an oral tumour influences the multi-disciplinary team's judgement about the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients.Method:Using a between-group design, two groups of health care professionals rated a hypothetical patient on 20 outcome variables. The patient description was identical for both groups, except for the tumour size.Results:Comparison of variable ratings revealed only three significant differences between the groups' predictions and no consistency within conditions, suggesting that the participants held few common assumptions about the impact of tumour size on a range of patient experiences.Conclusion:The lack of agreement amongst the health care professionals suggests that, where humane judgements are used in treatment decisions for head and neck cancer patients, these may be random and inconsistent. Consequently, patients should have a direct input into treatment decisions, via formalised quality of life data.


Head & Neck ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Stephens ◽  
Christopher W. Noel ◽  
Jie (Susie) Su ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Murray Krahn ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sammut ◽  
L.R. Fraser ◽  
M.J. Ward ◽  
T. Singh ◽  
N.N. Patel

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário Rodrigues de Melo Filho ◽  
Breno Amaral Rocha ◽  
Maria Betânia de Oliveira Pires ◽  
Emerson Santos Fonseca ◽  
Edimilson Martins de Freitas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document