scholarly journals Venous Insufficiency with Radiofrequency Ablation, Endovenous Laser Ablation and N-Butil Cyanoacrylate Embolization Long-Term Analysis of Patency Rates with Doppler Ultrasonography of Patients Comparison: Retrospective Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Hakan BAHADIR ◽  
Hasan TOZ
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Term Analysis

scholarly journals A randomized prospective long-term (>1 year) clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation to 980 nm laser ablation of the great saphenous vein

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Sydnor ◽  
John Mavropoulos ◽  
Natalia Slobodnik ◽  
Luke Wolfe ◽  
Brian Strife ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Superficial Venous Insufficiency

Purpose To compare the short- and long-term (>1 year) efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (ClosureFAST™) versus endovenous laser ablation (980 nm diode laser) for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. Materials and methods Two hundred patients with superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein were randomized to receive either radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation (and simultaneous adjunctive therapies for surface varicosities when appropriate). Post-treatment sonographic and clinical assessment was conducted at one week, six weeks, and six months for closure, complications, and patient satisfaction. Clinical assessment of each patient was conducted at one year and then at yearly intervals for patient satisfaction. Results Post-procedure pain ( p < 0.0001) and objective post-procedure bruising ( p = 0.0114) were significantly lower in the radiofrequency ablation group. Improvements in venous clinical severity score were noted through six months in both groups (endovenous laser ablation 6.6 to 1; radiofrequency ablation 6.2 to 1) with no significant difference in venous clinical severity score ( p = 0.4066) or measured adverse effects; 89 endovenous laser ablation and 87 radiofrequency patients were interviewed at least 12 months out with a mean long-term follow-up of 44 and 42 months ( p = 0.1096), respectively. There were four treatment failures in each group, and every case was correctable with further treatment. Overall, there were no significant differences with regard to patient satisfaction between radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation ( p = 0.3009). There were no cases of deep venous thrombosis in either group at any time during this study. Conclusions Radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation are highly effective and safe from both anatomic and clinical standpoints over a multi-year period and neither modality achieved superiority over the other.

Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Balint ◽  
Akos Farics ◽  
Krisztina Parti ◽  
Laszlo Vizsy ◽  
Jozsef Batorfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation

Objective The aim of this review article was to evaluate the long-term technical success rates of the known endovenous ablation procedures in the treatment of the incompetence of the great saphenous vein. Methods A literature search was conducted in the PubMed-database until the 5 January 2016. All publications with four to five years follow-up were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed by the IVhet-model. Results Eight hundred and sixty-two unique publications were found; 17 of them were appropriate for meta-analysis. Overall, 1420 limbs were included in the trial, 939 for endovenous laser ablation, 353 for radiofrequency ablation and 128 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. Overall, technical success rates were 84.8% for endovenous laser ablation, 88.7% for radiofrequency ablation and 32.8% for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. There were no significant differences between endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy regarding the great saphenous vein reopening ( p = 0.66; OR: 0.22; 95% of CI: 0.08–0.62 for radiofrequency ablation vs. endovenous laser ablation; p = 0.96; OR: 0.11; 95% of CI: 0.06–0.20 for endovenous laser ablation vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy; p = 0.93; OR: 3.20; 95% of CI: 0.54–18.90 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation). Conclusion Both endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are efficient in great saphenous vein occlusion on the long term. Lacking long-conducted large trials, the efficacy and reliability of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy to treat great saphenous vein-reflux is not affirmed.

scholarly journals Choice of the method of surgical treatment for ectasias of saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junctions

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
O. V. Sokolov
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Chronic Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
The Third ◽  
Varicose Disease

Objective. Analysis of results of radiofrequency laser ablation and crossectomy with stripping in patients, suffering varicose disease of the lower extremities veins in ectasias, sizing more than 14 mm in saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junctions. Materials and methods. Analysis of the treatment results was conducted for 66 patients, among whom there were 46 women. Average age of the patients have constituted 54.7 yrs. The patients were divided into three groups: the first - 22 patients, in whom crossectomy with stripping was accomplished, the second - 21 patients, in whom endovenous laser ablation was done, and the third - 23 patients, in whom radiofrequency ablation was performed. Level of the pain intensity was estimated during 7 days, dynamics of severity of chronic venous insufficiency, presence of complications and recurrences half a year postoperatively. Results. Severity of chronic venous insufficiency have reduced in 6 mo in all the groups under the influence of treatment: in the first group - by 63.8%, in second - by 50.1%, in the third - by 65.3%. The most reduction of the pain level (by 50%) on the second day postoperatively were registered in patients of the third group. Half a year before a recurrence in the first group have occurred in 4 (18.2%) patients, in the second - in 3 (14.3%), and in the third - in 1 (4.3%) patients. Conclusion. The selected methods of surgical treatment for varicose disease of the lower extremities are effective. In presence of ectasias of saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junctions the morbidity and recurrence rates were lowered, the pain indices reduced after the radiofrequency ablation application, comparing with endovenous laser ablation and crossectomy with stripping.

Endothermal ablation for the treatment of clinically significant incompetent lower limb perforating veins: factors influencing the early outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552095508
Author(s):  
Kenneth R Woodburn
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Perforating Veins ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Early Closure ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background To review the clinical experience and early outcomes of endothermal perforator ablation. Method Retrospective review of an endovenous practice from 2007-2019. Clinically significant incompetent perforators were treated by Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA), or segmental radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Result Complete data were available for 110 of the 116 symptomatic incompetent perforating veins treated. Radiofrequency ablation of 20 perforators produced a 55% perforator closure rate, while 90 EVLA perforator ablations resulted in a closure rate of 80%. Closure rates with EVLA varied by location and perforator length. Closure rates for truncal ablation were 95.5% for RFA and 97.2% for EVLA. Conclusion Early closure rates following endothermal ablation of incompetent lower limb perforating veins are lower than those obtained for truncal ablation. EVLA perforator closure appears to be more effective than segmental RFA in most situations but short treatment lengths and location at the ankle are associated with the poorest outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document