scholarly journals Simultaneous Repair of Cleft Hard Palate by Vomer Flap along with Cleft Lip in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazi Md. Noor-ul Ferdous ◽  
M. Saif Ullah ◽  
M. Shajahan ◽  
M. Ashrarur Rahman Mitul ◽  
M. Kabirul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Posterior Border ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Vomer Flap

The purpose of the study was to see the short-term outcome of simultaneous repair of cleft lip and cleft hard palate with vomer flap against cleft lip repair alone in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). A prospective observational study was carried out in 35 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who under-went cleft lip and cleft hard palate repair with vomer flaps simultaneously. After 3 months, cleft soft palate was repaired. During 1st and 2nd operations, the gap between cleft alveolus and posterior border of the cleft hard palate was measured. Postoperative complications, requirement of blood transfusion during the operation, and duration of operations were also recorded. Simultaneous repairs of cleft lip and closure of cleft hard palate with vomer flaps are easy to perform and are very effective for the repair of cleft lip and palate in UCLP patients. No blood transfusion was needed. Gaps of alveolar cleft and at the posterior border of hard palate were reduced remarkably, which made the closure of the soft palate easier, decreased operation time, and also decreased the chance of oronasal fistula formation.

Occlusion at 5 Years of Age Following Hard Palate Closure With Vestibular Flap

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 729-735
Author(s):  
Koichi Otsuki ◽  
Tadashi Yamanishi ◽  
Wakako Tome ◽  
Yuko Shintaku ◽  
Tetsuya Seikai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Local Closure ◽  
Group Technique

Objective: This study aims to assess occlusal relationships and frequency of oronasal fistula at 5 years of age following 2 hard palate closure techniques and to compare results. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Setting: Institutional study. Patients: Study patients included 57 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were consecutively treated. All patients underwent our early 2-stage protocol for palatoplasty, which consisted of soft palate plasty at 1 year of age and hard palate closure at 1.5 years of age. Twenty-nine patients underwent hard palate closure using vestibular flap (VF group) technique (2009-2011) and 28 patients underwent conventional hard palate closure with local palatal flap (LPF group) technique (2006-2008). Main Outcome Measures: Occlusal relationships were assessed with 5-year-olds’ index, and frequency of oronasal fistula was investigated. Results: Average 5-year-olds’ index scores for VF and LPF groups were 3.11 and 3.57, respectively ( P < .001). Oronasal fistula occurred in approximately 7% of patients in the VF group and in 18% of patients in the LPF group. Conclusion: Hard palate closure with VF technique may provide better occlusal relationships at 5 years of age than does conventional local closure with the LPF.

Influence of Infant Cleft Dimensions on Velopharyngeal Function in 5-Year-Old Danish Children Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-429
Author(s):  
Susanna Botticelli ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Helene Soegaard Andersen ◽  
Maria Boers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Aim: To examine the association of cleft severity at infancy and velopharyngeal competence in preschool children with unilateral cleft lip and palate operated with early or delayed hard palate repair. Design: Subgroup analysis within a multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery (Scandcleft). Setting: Tertiary health care. One surgical center. Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-five infants received cheilo-rhinoplasty and soft palate repair at age 3 to 4 months and were randomized to hard palate closure at age 12 or 36 months. Cleft size and cleft morphology were measured 3 dimensionally on digital models, obtained by laser surface scanning of preoperative plaster models (mean age: 1.8 months). Main outcome measurements: Velopharyngeal competence (VPC) and hypernasality assessed from a naming test (VPC-Sum) and connected speech (VPC-Rate). In both scales, higher scores indicated a more severe velopharyngeal insufficiency. Results: No difference between surgical groups was shown. A low positive correlation was found between posterior cleft width and VPC-Rate (Spearman = .23; P = .025). The role of the covariate “cleft size at tuberosity level” was confirmed in an ordinal logistic regression model (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.35). A low negative correlation was shown between anteroposterior palatal length and VPC-Sum (Spearman = −.27; P = .004) and confirmed by the pooled scores VPC-Pooled (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98) and VPC-Dichotomic (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99). Conclusions: Posterior cleft dimensions can be a modest indicator for the prognosis of velopharyngeal function at age 5 years, when the soft palate is closed first, independently on the timing of hard palate repair. Antero-posterior palatal length seems to protect from velopharyngeal insufficiency and hypernasality. However, the association found was significant but low.

scholarly journals Does Early Repair of Cleft Lip Helps to Reduce the Cleft Alveolar and Palatal Gap in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip - Palate Patients?

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Kazi Md Noor-ul Ferdous ◽  
Md Mafuzul Haq ◽  
S M Mashfiqur Rahman ◽  
Sabbir Karim ◽  
Md Mahabubul Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Palate Patient

Backgroud: Timing of surgery in the patients with cleft lip palate is an important factor of prognosis. Delaying in surgical repair of cleft lip and palate patient may lead to difficulty. It may causes wide, extensive and difficult dissection. There are always chances of wound infection, wound dehiscence, complete wound disruption, fistula formation, even there is also chance of maxillary hypoplasia and failure to articulate lifelong. The purpose of this study to observe the effects of cleft lip repair in early age on cleft alveolar and cleft palatal gap thus helps during cleft hard palate repair in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Methods: A retrospective study was done from January 2008 to July 2013. Patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate included in this study, who under went cleft lip at first admission and then and after 3 months of cleft palate was repaired. Patients with previous cleft lip-palate surgery were excluded. The gaps of cleft alveolus and posterior border of the cleft hard palate were recorded during 1st and 2nd operations. Age, gender, side of the cleft, associated anomalies, family history of cleft, cleft alveolar and cleft palatal gap noted, postoperative complications were also recorded. All the data were Results: A total of 63 patients included in this study. Age ranged from 4 months to 8 years. 38 patients were male and 25 were female. Right side was involved in 20 and 43 patients involved in left side. Eight patients had positive family history. Nine had associated congenital anomalies. Cleft alveolar and palatal gap reduced more in the patients who were below the age of 18 months. Postoperative complications were mild respiratory distress, notching of vermilion border developed oronasal fistula.Conclusion: In unilateral complete cleft lip palate patient, early cleft lip repair results, reduction of gaps of alveolar cleft and that of hard palate remarkably, especially in the patients who came for cleft lip surgery in appropriate time.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v13i3.21023

Repair of cleft lip and simultaneous repair of cleft hard palate with vomer flap in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 995-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazi Md. Noor-ul Ferdous ◽  
A. J. M. Salek ◽  
M. Kabirul Islam ◽  
Bijiy Krishna Das ◽  
A. R. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Vomer Flap

Do Infant Cleft Dimensions Have an Influence on Occlusal Relations? A Subgroup Analysis Within an RCT of Primary Surgery in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-388
Author(s):  
Susanna Botticelli ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Agneta Marcusson ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Sven E. Nørholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Size And Morphology ◽  
Crude Analysis ◽  
Closure Group

Aim: To investigate whether infant cleft dimensions, in a surgical protocol with early or delayed hard palate closure, influence occlusion before orthodontics. Design: Subgroup analysis within a randomized trial of primary surgery (Scandcleft). Setting: Tertiary health care. One surgical centre. Patients and Methods: A total of 122 unilateral cleft lip and palate infants received primary cheilo-rhinoplasty and soft palate closure at age 4 months and were randomized for hard palate closure at age 12 versus 36 months. A novel 3D analysis of cleft size and morphology was performed on digitized presurgical models. Occlusion was scored on 8-year models using the modified Huddarth–Bodenham (MHB) Index and the Goslon Yardstick. Main Outcome Measurements: Differences in MHB and Goslon scores among the 2 surgical groups adjusted for cleft size. Results: The crude analysis showed no difference between the 2 surgical groups in Goslon scores but a better MHB ( P = .006) for the group who received delayed hard palate closure. When adjusting for the ratio between cleft surface and palatal surface (3D Infant Cleft Severity Ratio) and for posterior cleft dimensions at tuberosity level, the delayed hard palate closure group received 3.65 points better for MHB (confidence interval: 1.81; 5.48; P < .001) and showed a trend for reduced risk of receiving a Goslon of 4 or 5 ( P = .052). For posterior clefts larger than 9 mm, the Goslon score was better in the delayed hard palate closure group ( P = .033). Conclusions: Seen from an orthodontic perspective, when the soft palate is closed first, and the cleft is large, the timing of hard palate closure should be planned in relation to posterior cleft size.

Evaluation of Maxillary Dental Arch Form in Unilateral Clefts of Lip, Alveolus, and Palate from One Month to Four Years

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mazaheri ◽  
A.E. Athanasiou ◽  
R.E. Long ◽  
O.G. Kolokitha
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Arch Form ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Vomer Flap ◽  
Dental Arch Form

This study evaluated the early changes of maxillary alveolar arches of operated unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Dental casts were available at four age increments. Triangular flap cheiloplasty was carried out at an early age. Two-stage palatoplasty by vomer flap and soft palate closure took place later. Prior to lip repair, the alveolar arches were classified according to the relationship between greater and lesser segments. Almost a quarter had overlap of the alveolar segments with no contact between the alveolar ridges at the cleft site; some had no overlap with contact of the alveolar segments in the cleft region; almost a quarter had both overlap of the alveolar segments and contact; and almost half had no overlap of the segments and the alveolar ridges were not in contact at the cleft site. After lip repair, the arch relationships were examined and the percentage of patients in each of the four groups indicated a moulding effect of lip repair on the alveolar segments. This moulding effect caused the alveolar segments in most patients to be in contact at the cleft site. Most of these also had segment overlap. All patients were re-examined shortly after palatal repair. The trend for segment overlap and contact continued after palate surgery. However, when all patients were seen at age 4, percentages of patients in each group indicated that previous overlap of segments improved to a more desirable nonoverlapped relationship in approximately half of the patients. The other half continued to demonstrate arch collapse, in excess of what would be considered ideal ridge relationship.

On the Frequency of Oronasal Fistulation After Primary Cleft Palate Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1302-1313
Author(s):  
Ana Tache ◽  
Maurice Y. Mommaerts
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Fistula Rate

Objective: The aims of the study were to assess the postoperative oronasal fistula rate after 1-stage and 2-stage cleft palate repair and identify risk factors associated with its development. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Various primary cleft and craniofacial centers in the world. Patients, Participants: Syndromic and nonsyndromic cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients who had undergone primary cleft palate surgery. Intervention: Assessment of oronasal fistula frequency and correlation with staging, timing, and technique of repair, gender, and Veau type. The results obtained in this systematic review were compared with those in previous reports. Outcome: The main outcome is represented by the occurrence of the oronasal fistula after 1-stage versus 2-stage palatoplasty. Results: The mean fistula percentage was 9.94%. In the Veau I, II, III, and IV groups, the respective fistula rates were 2%, 7.3%, 8.3%, and 12.5%. Oronasal fistula locations based on the Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System were soft palate (type II), 16.2%; soft palate–hard palate junction (type III), 29.3%; and hard palate (type IV), 37.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between 1-stage and 2-stage palatoplasty, syndromic and nonsyndromic, or male and female patients. Primary palatoplasty timing was not a significant predictor. Conclusion: Some disparities arose when comparing studies, mainly regarding location and types of clefting prone to oronasal fistulation. Interestingly, the fistula rate does not differ between 1- and 2-stage closure, and timing of the repair does not play a role.

Scandcleft Project Trial 3: Comparison of Speech Outcomes in Relation to Sequence in 2-Stage Palatal Repair Procedures in 5-Year-Olds With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Persson ◽  
Nina-Helen Pedersen ◽  
Christine Hayden ◽  
Melanie Bowden ◽  
Ragnhild Aukner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Composite Measure ◽  
Connected Speech ◽  
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Speech Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Age Appropriate

Objective: To compare speech outcome following different sequencing of hard and soft palate closure between arms and centers within trial 3 and compare results to peers without cleft palate. Design: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting: Two Norwegian and 2 British centers. Participants: One hundred thirty-six 5-year-olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate were randomized to either lip and soft palate closure at 3 to 4 months and hard palate closure at 12 months (arm A) or lip and hard palate closure at 3 to 4 months and soft palate closure at 12 months (arm D). Main Outcome Measures: A composite measure of velopharyngeal competence (VPC), overall assessment of VPC from connected speech (VPC-Rate). Percentage of consonants correct (PCC), active cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), subdivided by oral retracted and nonoral errors, and developmental speech characteristics (DSCs). Results: Across the trial, 47% had VPC, with no statistically significant difference between arms within or across centers. Thirty-eight percent achieved a PCC score of >90%, with no difference between arms or centers. In one center, significantly more children in arm A produced ≥3 active CSCs ( P < .05). Across centers, there was a statistically significant difference in active CSCs (arm D), oral retracted CSCs (arm D), and DSCs (arms A and D). Conclusions: Less than half of the 5-year-olds achieved VPC and around one-third achieved age-appropriate PCC scores. Cleft speech characteristics were more common in arm A, but outcomes varied within and across centers. Thus, outcome of the same surgical method can vary substantially across centers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document