scholarly journals The complications associated with guidewire use in spine surgeries involving pedicle screw placement: A comprehensive literature review

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
John B. Pracyk ◽  
Nicole Ferko ◽  
Adrian P. Turner ◽  
Sara N. Root ◽  
Heather Cannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Metal Fatigue ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

Guidewires (Kirschner or “K” wires) are often required during minimally invasive spine surgery to facilitate percutaneous pedicle screw placement. The use of guidewires involves a multi-step process that carries the risk of complications and their associated consequences. To date, the reporting of such information has been limited, and the literature has not been thoroughly evaluated. The objective of this study was to conduct a narrative review and assess the burden associated with guidewire use in spine surgeries. Databases searched included PubMed and Embase between the years of 1988 and 2017. In addition to databases, recent data from relevant trade journals were hand-searched. Inclusion criteria were broad to avoid potential exclusion of relevant publications. In total, 31 articles were included. This review found that the risk of complications associated with guidewire use in spine procedures ranged from 0.4% to 14.8%. Complication types included guidewire fracture, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, post-operative ileus, infection, and other spinal hardware failure (e.g., pedicle screw pull-out). Causes of complications typically included breakage and migration of the guidewire (metal fatigue), inexperience with guidewire use, or lack of tactile or visual feedback. Specific surgery types or patient populations may be more susceptible to guidewire-related complications (e.g., L5-S1 level operations). Complications associated with guidewire use may also lead to healthcare resource utilization, including additional operating time, radiation exposure, and re-operations. Solutions to help minimize the risk of such complications and associated consequences are required.

Accuracy and technical limits of percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann Philippe Charles ◽  
Yves Ntilikina ◽  
Arnaud Collinet ◽  
Sébastien Schuller ◽  
Julien Garnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

scholarly journals Radiographic Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Fluoroscopic- Versus CT Navigation-Guided Lumbar Spine Instrumentation

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Ting Cong ◽  
Avani Vaishnav ◽  
Joseph Barbera ◽  
Hiroshi Kumagai ◽  
James Dowdell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spine Instrumentation ◽  
Surgical Methods

Abstract INTRODUCTION Posterior spinal instrumentation for fusion using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation is gaining traction as an alternative to the conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopic-guided approach to percutaneous pedicle screw placement. However, few studies to date have directly compared outcomes of these 2 minimally invasive instrumentation methods. METHODS A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing primary percutaneous posterior lumbar spine instrumentation for spine fusion was retrospectively reviewed. Revision surgeries or cases converted to open were excluded. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using a postoperative CT scan with blinding to the surgical methods used. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification was used to grade cortical breach: Grade 0 (<0 mm cortical breach), Grade I (<2 mm), Grade II (2-4 mm), Grade III (4-6 mm), and Grade IV (>6 mm). RESULTS CT navigation was found to significantly improve accuracy of screw placement (P < .022). There was significantly more facet violation of the unfused level in the fluoroscopy group vs the CT group (9% vs 0.5%; P < .0001). There was also a higher proportion of poor screw placement in the fluoroscopy group (10.1% vs 3.6%). No statistical difference was found in the rate of tip breach, inferomedial breach, or lateral breach. Regression analysis showed that fluoroscopy had twice the odds of incurring poor screw placement as compared to CT navigation. CONCLUSION This radiographic study comparing screw placement in minimally invasive fluoroscopy- vs CT navigation-guided lumbar spine instrumentation provides evidence that CT navigation significantly improves accuracy of screw placement, especially in optimizing the screw trajectory so as to avoid facet violation. Long-term follow-up studies should be performed to ascertain whether this difference can contribute to an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique or “owl's-eye” view and novel guidance technology

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cary Idler ◽  
Kevin W. Rolfe ◽  
Josef E. Gorek
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Guidance System ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle

Object This study was conducted to assess the in vivo safety and accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the owl's-eye view of the pedicle axis and a new guidance technology system that facilitates orientation of the C-arm into the appropriate fluoroscopic view and the pedicle cannulation tool in the corresponding trajectory. Methods A total of 326 percutaneous pedicle screws were placed from L-3 to S-1 in 85 consecutive adult patients. Placement was performed using simple coaxial imaging of the pedicle with the owl's-eye fluoroscopic view. NeuroVision, a new guidance system using accelerometer technology, helped align the C-arm trajectory into the owl's-eye view and the cannulation tool in the same trajectory. Postoperative fine-cut CT scans were acquired to assess screw position. Medical records were reviewed for complications. Results Five of 326 screws breached a pedicle cortex—all breaches were less than 2 mm—for an accuracy rate of 98.47%. Five screws violated an adjacent facet joint. All were at the S-1 superior facet and included in a fusion. No screw violated an adjacent mobile facet or disc space. There were no cases of new or worsening neurological symptoms or deficits for an overall clinical accuracy of 100%. Conclusions The owl's-eye technique of coaxial pedicle imaging with the C-arm fluoroscopy, facilitated by NeuroVision, is a safe and accurate means by which to place percutaneous pedicle screws for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. This is the largest series reported to use the oblique or owl's-eye projection for percutaneous pedicle screw insertion. The accuracy of percutaneous screw insertion with this technique meets or exceeds that of other reported clinical series or techniques.

Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Mroz ◽  
Kalil G. Abdullah ◽  
Michael P. Steinmetz ◽  
Eric O. Klineberg ◽  
Isador H. Lieberman
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Power Tool

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kojima ◽  
Atsushi Fujii ◽  
Shigeta Morioka ◽  
Yoshiaki Torii ◽  
Kenichiro Arai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document