scholarly journals Long range forecasting parameters vis-a-vis sub-divisional summer rainfall over India

MAUSAM ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190
Author(s):  
S.S. SINGH ◽  
S.V. DATAR ◽  
H.N. SRIVASTAVA

Interannual variability of Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOF) based upon regional/global parameters, associated with the summer monsoon rainfall over different meteorological sub-divisions of the country have been discussed, based upon the data during the years 1958 to 1990 enabling us to identify three broad  sub-divisions of the country.   It was interesting to note that the first empirical orthogonal function did not show significant correlation with monsoon rainfall over most SUB-DIVISIONS of the NE and SE parts of the country. However, this EOF was found to be significantly correlated with the rainfall over the remaining meteorological sub-divisions of the country.  

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 6501-6514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H. Monahan ◽  
John C. Fyfe ◽  
Maarten H. P. Ambaum ◽  
David B. Stephenson ◽  
Gerald R. North

Abstract Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis is a powerful tool for data compression and dimensionality reduction used broadly in meteorology and oceanography. Often in the literature, EOF modes are interpreted individually, independent of other modes. In fact, it can be shown that no such attribution can generally be made. This review demonstrates that in general individual EOF modes (i) will not correspond to individual dynamical modes, (ii) will not correspond to individual kinematic degrees of freedom, (iii) will not be statistically independent of other EOF modes, and (iv) will be strongly influenced by the nonlocal requirement that modes maximize variance over the entire domain. The goal of this review is not to argue against the use of EOF analysis in meteorology and oceanography; rather, it is to demonstrate the care that must be taken in the interpretation of individual modes in order to distinguish the medium from the message.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 7909-7931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsing-Chang Chen ◽  
Jenq-Dar Tsay ◽  
Jun Matsumoto

Abstract A northwest–southeast-oriented summer monsoon trough exists between northern Indochina and northwestern Borneo. Ahead of this the South China Sea (SCS) trough is located at a convergent center west of the Philippines, which provides an environment favorable for rain-producing synoptic systems to produce rainfall over this center and form the SCS summer rainfall center. Revealed from the x–t diagram for rainfall, this rainfall center is developed by multiple-scale processes involved with the SCS trough (TR), tropical depression (TY), interaction of the SCS trough with the easterly wave/tropical depression (EI), and easterly wave (EW). It is found that 56% of this rainfall center is produced by the SCS trough, while 41% is generated by the other three synoptic systems combined. Apparently, the formation of the SCS summer monsoon rainfall center is contributed to by these four rain-producing synoptic systems from the SCS and the Philippines Sea. The Southeast Asian summer monsoon undergoes an interannual variation and exhibits an east–west-oriented cyclonic (anticyclonic) anomalous circulation centered at the western tropical Pacific east of the Luzon Strait. This circulation change is reflected by the deepening (filling) of the SCS summer monsoon trough, when the monsoon westerlies south of 15°N intensify (weaken). This interannual variation of the monsoon westerlies leads to the interannual variation of the SCS summer monsoon rainfall center to follow the Pacific–Japan oscillation of rainfall. The rainfall amount produced over this rainfall center during the weak monsoon season is about two-thirds of that produced during the strong monsoon season. The rain-production ratio between TR and TY + EI + EW is 60:38 during the strong monsoon season and 47:49 during the weak monsoon season.


MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-382
Author(s):  
DHANNA SINGH ◽  
C.V.V. BHADRAM ◽  
G.S. MANDAL

ABSTRACT .The tropospheric mean monthly thickness anomalies of northern Indian stations of selected layers for the months April to July for a 28 years (1968-95) period have been analysed. The thickness anomalies of April and May exhibit significant persistence through July. Also the thickness anomalies of different layers for the months May-July are found to have generally significant (5% to 0.1% level) linear correlations with the succeeding all India seasonal monsoon rainfall. Out of different layers and all the months analysed, the thickness anomalies of 850-300 and 850-100 hPa layers for May are found to have maximum correlations (significant at 0.1% level). From linear and multiple regression results, 850-300 hPa thickness anomaly is seen to be a useful predictor for long range prediction of Indian monsoon rainfall.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document