The relationship between TIMI flow grade and hematological parameters in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Oylumlu ◽  
Adnan Dogan ◽  
Suleyman Ercan ◽  
Celal Kilit ◽  
Basri Amasyali
Author(s):  
Mohammed Rouzbahani ◽  
Mohsen Rezaie ◽  
Nahid Salehi ◽  
Parisa Janjani ◽  
Reza Heidari Moghadam ◽  
...  

Background: Doing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the first hours of myocardial infraction (MI) is effective in re-establishment of blood flow. Anticoagulation treatment should be prescribed in patients undergoing PCI to decrease the side effects of ischemia. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of heparin prescription after PCI on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Materials: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted at Imam Ali cardiovascular center at Kermanshah university of medical science (KUMS), Iran. Between April 2019 to October 2019, 400 patients with STEMI which candidate to PCI were enrolled. Patients randomly divided in two groups: intervention group (received 5,000 units of heparin after PCI until first 24 hours, every 6 hours) and control group (did not receive heparin). Data were collected using a checklist developed based on the study's aims. Differences between groups were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-square (or Fisher exact tests).Result: Observed that, mean prothrombin time (PT) (13.30±1.60 vs. 12.21±1.15, p<0.001) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (35.30±3.08 vs. 34.41±3.01, p=0.003) were significantly higher in intervention group compared to control group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 after primary PCI was significantly more frequently in control group (5.5% vs. 1.0%, p=0.034). The mean of ejection fraction (EF) after PCI (47.58±7.12 vs. 45.15±6.98, p<0.001) was significantly higher in intervention group. Intervention group had a statistically significant shorter length of hospital stay (4.71±1.03 vs. 6.12±1.10, p<0.001). There was higher incidence of re-vascularization (0% vs. 3.0%; p=0.013) and re-MI (0% vs. 2.5%; p=0.024) in the control group.Conclusion: Performing primary PCI with receiving heparin led to improve TIMI flow and consequently better EF. Receiving heparin is associated with lower risk of re-MI and re-vascularization.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hoon Kim ◽  
Ae-Young Her ◽  
Myung Ho Jeong ◽  
Byeong-Keuk Kim ◽  
Sung-Jin Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Studies comparing long-term clinical outcomes between prediabetes and diabetes based on pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after successful PCI with newer-generation drug-eluting stents are limited. We compared 2-year clinical outcomes of these two groups. Methods: Overall, 6448 STEMI patients were divided into two groups: pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 group (n = 4854) and pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 group (n = 1594). Subsequently, these two groups were further divided into patients with normoglycemia, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The major endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. Results: After adjustment, in the pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 group, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death was higher in both prediabetes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.633, p = 0.045) and T2DM (aHR: 2.064, p = 0.002) groups than in the normoglycemia group. In the pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 group, the cumulative incidence of any repeat revascularization was higher in both prediabetes (aHR: 2.511, p = 0.039) and T2DM (aHR: 3.156, p = 0.009) groups than in the normoglycemia group. However, in each group (pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 or 2/3), the cumulative incidences of MACEs and all other clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the prediabetes and T2DM groups. Conclusions: In this retrospective registry study, prediabetes showed worse clinical outcomes similar to those of T2DM regardless of the pre-PCI TIMI flow grade. However, further studies are warranted to confirm these results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Cheng Chen ◽  
Yan-Ren Lin ◽  
Chia-Te Kung ◽  
Cheng-I Cheng ◽  
Chao-Jui Li

Background. The study aimed to verify the effect of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with <60 min door-to-balloon time on ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients’ prognoses. Methods. Outcomes of patients receiving PPCI with door-to-balloon time of <60 min were compared with those of patients receiving PPCI with door-to-balloon time 60–90 min. Result. Totally, 241 STEMI patients (191 with Killip classes I or II) and 104 (71 with Killip classes I or II) received PPCI with door-to-balloon time <60 and 60–90 min, respectively. Killip classes I and II patients with door-to-balloon time <60 min had better thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow (9.2% fewer patients with TIMI flow <3, p=0.019) and 8.0% lower 30-day mortality rate (p<0.001) than those with 60–90 min. After controlling the confounding factors with logistic regression, patients with door-to-balloon time <60 min had lower incidences of TIMI flow <3 (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.20–0.76), 30-day recurrent myocardial infarction (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.10–0.91), and 30-day mortality (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.09–0.77) than those with 60–90 min. Conclusion. Door-to-balloon time <60 min is associated with better blood flow in the infarct-related artery and lower 30-day recurrent myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document