Modeling a 3-D Velocity Structure around the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant for Evaluation of Long Period Strong Ground Motions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 3_1-3_20
Author(s):  
Takashi HAYAKAWA ◽  
Akihiro SHIMMURA ◽  
Kazuhito HIKIMA ◽  
Tomiichi UETAKE
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Ground Motions ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Strong Ground

Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Strong-Motion Records of the 12 December 2018 M 4.4 Decatur, Tennessee, Earthquake

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 1579-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Graizer ◽  
Dogan Seber ◽  
Scott Stovall
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Digital Recordings

Abstract The moment magnitude M 4.4 on 12 December 2018 Decatur, Tennessee, earthquake occurred in the eastern Tennessee seismic zone. Although the causative fault is not known, the earthquake had a predominantly strike-slip mechanism with an estimated hypocentral depth of about 8 km. It was felt over a distance of 500 km stretching from Southern Kentucky to Georgia. Strong shaking, capable of causing slight damage, was reported near the epicenter. The Watts Bar nuclear power plant (NPP) is only 4.9 km from the epicenter of the earthquake and experienced only slight shaking. The earthquake was recorded by the plant’s seismic strong-motion instrumentation installed at four different locations. Near-real-time calculations by the plant operators indicated that the operating basis earthquake (OBE) ground motion was not exceeded during the earthquake. We obtained and processed the recorded motions to calculate corrected accelerations, velocities, and displacements. In addition, we computed the Fourier and 5% damped response spectra to compare them with the plant’s OBE. Comparisons of the ground-motion prediction models with the digital recordings at the plant site indicated that recorded ground motions were significantly below the predicted results calculated using the ground-motion prediction models approved for regulatory use. Availability of high-quality, digital recordings in this case helped make a quick decision about the ground motions not exceeding the OBE and hence prevented unnecessary shutdown of the NPP. Availability of earthquake recordings from the four locations in the NPP also presented an opportunity to analyze the linear response of plant structures.

Seismic fragility analysis of nuclear power plant structure under far-field ground motions

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 110890
Author(s):  
Chunfeng Zhao ◽  
Na Yu ◽  
Yagiz Oz ◽  
Jingfeng Wang ◽  
Y.L. Mo
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Plant Structure

Factors Influencing Maximum and Residual Deformations of SDOF Systems Subjected to Large Ground Motions

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 170-177
Author(s):  
Peng Pan ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Shi Yan Song ◽  
Lie Ping Ye
Keyword(s):  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Stiffness Degradation ◽  
Maximum Deformation ◽  
Strong Ground Motions ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Residual Deformations ◽  
Yield Force ◽  
Strong Ground

The maximum and residual deformations of structures subjected to strong ground motions are the most importance indexes, particularly under the performance-based design framework, thus understanding the influencing factors is of great importance to seismic design. In this study, single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems with varying structural properties are analyzed using a series of strong ground motions from FEM/SAC project. The influences of three structural parameters, i.e., yield force, second stiffness after yielding, and stiffness degradation, on the maximum and residual deformations are investigated based on the statistics of the analysis results. The analysis results suggest the follows: (1) larger yield forces lead to smaller residual and maximum deformations for short period structures, and they lead to smaller residual deformations but no necessarily smaller maximum deformation for intermediate and long period structures; (2) larger second stiffness lead to smaller residual and maximum deformations for short period structures, and they lead to smaller residual deformations but no necessarily smaller maximum deformation for intermediate and long period structures; (3) smaller stiffness degradation index leads to smaller maximum deformations but larger residual deformations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document