A Case Study on the Relationship between Rural Land Use and Avifauna in West Kobe and East Harima

1997 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru FUKUI ◽  
Noboru MASUDA ◽  
Daisyu ABE
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyan Hu ◽  
Siyu Zhang ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Tian Liu ◽  
Yingchao Lin ◽  
...  

The purpose of this article is to analyze the effects of multifunctional rural land use (MRLU) on residents’ wellbeing. A questionnaire survey on 805 rural residents in 64 villages of the Xinzhou District of Wuhan city in China, and estimators of OLS, ordered logit, and ordered probit were employed. The Shannon’s H index and Simpson’s Reciprocal Index are used to measure MRLU and the life satisfaction approach is used to measure wellbeing. An inverted-U pattern is observed in the relationship between MRLU and wellbeing, and another finding of the study is the threshold of MRLU. The article contributes to the literature by integrating MRLU into wellbeing analysis from a spatial-separated form, and deepens the relationship between MRLU and the residents’ wellbeing. MRLU is characterized by differences and a moderation, which can provide a reference for profiling rural land use planning and for designing land-use policy, and for prompting rural sustainable development.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison J. Haughton ◽  
Alan J. Bond ◽  
Andrew A. Lovett ◽  
Trudie Dockerty ◽  
Gilla Sünnenberg ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 199-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
PHILIP J. BACON ◽  
JEREMY D. CAIN ◽  
MICHAL KOZAKIEWICZ ◽  
MARCIN BRZEZINSKI ◽  
ANNA LIRO

A Bayesian Network approach to developing effective policies for more sustainable rural land use and development is presented which: • incorporates several different stakeholder viewpoints • integrates and balances the results from different viewpoints, and thus facilitates compromise land use solutions • elucidates the main factors affecting stakeholders' decisions, on which policy levers will operate more effectively • allows differences between "expected change" and "observed change" to be understood as arising from uncertainty and variation about "the average situation" • demonstrates the crucial roles of beliefs and uncertainties in determining the preferred options of different groups • emphasises the need to know the beliefs and uncertainties of local land managers • incorporates public participation and social learning while such necessary data are gathered. The approach's merits for fostering pro-active policy design and subsidiarity, and for focusing the research needed to underpin rural policy are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document