Major trauma outcomes in the elderly

1994 ◽  
Vol 160 (11) ◽  
pp. 675-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Day ◽  
John Vinen ◽  
Elizabeth Hewitt‐Falls
Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862098226
Author(s):  
Will Kieffer ◽  
Daniel Michalik ◽  
Jason Bernard ◽  
Omar Bouamra ◽  
Benedict Rogers

Introduction Trauma is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, but little is known of the temporal variation in major trauma across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Proper workforce and infrastructure planning requires identification of the caseload burden and its temporal variation. Materials and Methods The Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database for admissions attending Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) between 1st April 2011 and 31st March 2018 was analysed. TARN records data on all trauma patients admitted to hospital who are alive at the time of admission to hospital. Major trauma was classified as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15. Results A total of 158,440 cases were analysed. Case ascertainment was over 95% for 2013 onwards. There was a statistically significant variation in caseload by year (p < 0.0001), times of admissions (p < 0.0001), caseload admitted during weekends vs weekdays, 53% vs 47% (p < 0.0001), caseload by season with most patients admitted during summer (p < 0.0001). The ISS varied by time of admission with most patients admitted between 1800 and 0559 (p < 0.0001), weekend vs weekday with more severely injured patients admitted during the weekend (p < 0.0001) and by season p < 0.0001). Discussion and Conclusion: There is a significant national temporal variation in major trauma workload. The reasons are complex and there are multiple theories and confounding factors to explain it. This is the largest dataset for hospitals submitting to TARN which can help guide workforce and resource allocation to further improve trauma outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
C. Andrew Eynon ◽  
Lucy J. Robinson ◽  
Kara M. Smith

Background Medical–legal partnerships integrate lawyers into health care to identify and address legal problems that can create and perpetuate disparities in health for patients and their families. They have previously been utilised for patients who are at high-risk of being disadvantaged such as the elderly, the disabled and those affected by chronic diseases. We have used a partnership to address the legal needs of patients with acute, critical illness including major trauma. Method In 2007, a free, comprehensive legal advice service was established at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. The service is bound by strict guidelines which have been endorsed by NHS England. The legal service is specifically prevented from acting against the NHS. A retrospective analysis of the service over a period of 11 years was undertaken to look at the range of legal advice sought. Where a potential compensation claim against a third party was identified, the percentage of cases where the legal service was instructed was noted and the outcome for those cases was examined in further detail. Results Five hundred and fifty-one patients and or their families have been referred to the legal service. Of these, 343 had sustained major trauma. Over 2300 hours of free legal advice were provided on non-compensation issues, primarily related to welfare benefits, local authority assistance, obtaining power of attorney or seeking Deputyship from the Court of Protection and claims against existing insurance policies. Two hundred and seventy-five of the 551 patients (50%) were found to have a potential compensation claim against a third party. The legal service was instructed to pursue a claim in 82 cases. Interim payments of nearly £13 million were provided and £128 million of compensation has been awarded in 51 cases that have been settled. Discussion Medical–legal partnerships are well-established in the USA. We have demonstrated that in UK, there is a demand for early legal advice for patients who have sustained critical illness including major trauma. More data are required to identify the rehabilitation outcomes for patients who have received legal support. A similar medical–legal partnership should be considered at every acute NHS Trust.


Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Morrissey ◽  
Ruth A. Delaney ◽  
Alan J. Johnstone ◽  
Laurie Petrovick ◽  
R. Malcolm Smith

The Surgeon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-149
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Lodge ◽  
Robert M. West ◽  
Peter Giannoudis ◽  
Theodoros H. Tosounidis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L.S. Driessen ◽  
L.M. Sturms ◽  
F.W. Bloemers ◽  
H.J. ten Duis ◽  
M.J.R. Edwards ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 703-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A.W Pickering ◽  
D Esberger ◽  
C.G Moran
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 833-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus P Kennedy ◽  
Belinda J Gabbe ◽  
Ben A McKenzie
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
D. Chowdhury

Historically trauma has been identified as the leading cause of death in the younger under 40’s population (1). However, with an aging population there is a higher incidence of trauma sustained in the elderly population. Silver trauma is defined as elderly patient of retirement age or over the age of 65 years. This has been taken into consideration when trauma guidelines have been incorporated. To name a few examples, the CCSR (Canadian C-spine rule) includes the at-risk population as those >/= 65 years of age in the context of potential cervical spine injury. In various major trauma trial tools, the >65 years of age group are considered to be a high risk of deteoriation group. Through clinical practice clinicians have noted that in this group of patients’ injuries can be missed which would be detrimental to the overall outcome of these patients. Through this article I aim to highlight the main issues that make the initial management of the elderly trauma patient at times challenging. Furthermore, suggestion for potential management strategies will also be highlighted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document