Changing patterns of injury associated with low-energy falls in the elderly: a 10-year analysis at an Australian Major Trauma Centre

Introduction Horse riding carries risk of injury which can result in fatality. The majority of published literature describes major trauma centre experience. We aimed to characterise injury patterns following equine trauma at a Scottish district general hospital. Methods A retrospective review of admissions following equine trauma was undertaken from 2014 to 2019. Mechanism and nature of injuries were noted. Patient management and outcomes were recorded and analysed to determine correlation. Results Of the 162 patients identified, 121 (74.7 per cent) were female. The commonest mechanism and injury sustained were falling from a horse (86.4 per cent) and head injury (17.9 per cent) respectively. Forty-four (27.2 per cent) had multiple injuries identified. Being crushed or kicked resulted in more abdominal visceral injuries (22.7 vs 0.7 per cent, p = <0.05) and ITU admissions (18.2 vs 6.4 per cent, p = 0.06) when compared with falling from alone. Eight (4.9 per cent) required transfer to a major trauma centre and 30-day mortality was 0.6 per cent. Conclusion Although variable, injuries following equine trauma can be life threatening. Increased awareness and development of safety legislation is needed. In addition, research could be directed at assessing functional outcomes given the large number of orthopaedic injuries.

Download Full-text

A comparison between the Major Trauma Centre management of complex open lower limb fractures in children and the elderly

Injury ◽

10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.001 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 50 (7) ◽

pp. 1376-1381 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Muhammad Faheem Khadim ◽

Ahmed Emam ◽

Thomas C. Wright ◽

Thomas W.L. Chapman ◽

Umraz Khan

Keyword(s):

Lower Limb ◽

Major Trauma ◽

The Elderly ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Lower Limb Fractures ◽

Fractures In Children ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Limb Fractures

Download Full-text

40 Cattle-Related Trauma: A 5 Year Retrospective Review in An Adult Major Trauma Centre

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.965 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

J H Rhind ◽

D Quinn ◽

L Cosbey ◽

D Mobley ◽

I Britton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Hospital Admissions ◽

Road Traffic ◽

Soft Tissue Injuries ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Emergency Patients ◽

Probability Of Survival ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Patterns Of Injury

Abstract Aim Bovine injuries are a common and significant cause of trauma, often requiring admission and operative treatment. We review all bovine related injuries over five years, both emergency and GP referrals at an adult major trauma centre in England. Method Retrospective evaluation was undertaken using keywords through radiology referrals and hospital admissions speciality databases. Demographics were collected as well as the mechanism and the situation of injury; trauma scores were calculated using: Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Probability of Survival (Ps19). Results Sixty-seven patients were identified retrospectively over 5 years, 44 emergency patients (including 23 major traumas) and 23 GP referrals. Combined (Emergency & GP) mean age 52 years old. 67% male. Mean ISS 11. Most common combined mechanism of injury, kicked (n = 23). In emergency patients, trampling injuries were most common. 86% of the trampled patients were major traumas. Indirect injuries mainly involved farm gates (92%). 73% of bull-related injuries were major traumas. In emergency patients’ fractures were the most common primary injury (n = 20), upper limb followed by spine. In GP, soft tissue injuries were the most common. 70% of the emergency referrals required admission and 50% operations. Only one GP referral required an operation. Two patients had a Ps19 score <90. There were two mortalities. Conclusions Cattle related injuries are a significant cause of severe morbidity and mortality. They are under-reported. Patterns of injury are similar to high velocity road traffic collisions and bull-related injuries or trampling in particular, should alert the clinician to more significant trauma.

Download Full-text

Laparotomy for Abdominal Stab Wound With Combined Omental and Organ Evisceration: 10-Year Experience From a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/00031348211031855 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 000313482110318

Author(s):

Victor Kong ◽

Cynthia Cheung ◽

Nigel Rajaretnam ◽

Rohit Sarvepalli ◽

William Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

Small Bowel ◽

Large Bowel ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Stab Wound ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Mean ◽

Overall Mortality

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.

Download Full-text

592 Surgical Management of Open Tibia Fractures at A Major Trauma Centre: A Review of Cases Over A One-Year Period

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.153 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Khajuria

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Surgical Management ◽

Open Fracture ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Soft Tissue Coverage ◽

Internal Stabilization ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

One Year

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.

Download Full-text