3D-Druck trifft auf Urheber- und Patentrecht

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Probst
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Policy Perspective ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Technological Approach ◽  
Further Development

This work presents 3D printing technology, including its technical aspects, identifies problem areas in its existing legal framework and, by means of typifying interpretation, incorporates it into the context of copyright and patenting law. It not only focuses on the interpretation and application of copyright and patenting legislation, but also takes a legal policy perspective on the further development of these two areas of law. Against this background, it applies a ‘more technological approach’ to intellectual property law, which takes account of the changing reality in this regard as a result of new technological possibilities.

Some Key Issues Concerning Further Development of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Xianlin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Industrial Policy ◽  
Competition Policy ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Antitrust Enforcement ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Strict Compliance ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Further Development

Since the Anti-Monopoly Law was enforced in China more than eight years ago, important achievements have occurred, as well as challenges for further development. In addition to challenges relating to amending legislation, strengthening enforcement, improving the judicial process, and ensuring strict compliance, etc, there are four issues that will be focused on here, namely: taking monopoly industries as a breakthrough to further promote the enforcement of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (both administrative and civil antitrust enforcement should focus on prominent monopolistic conducts in typical monopoly industries); properly handling the coordination between industrial policy and competition policy; promoting the cooperation between the Anti-Monopoly Law and intellectual property law; and cultivating China’s competition culture.

scholarly journals Documenting the copyright sphere: can festivals solve the problem of copyright clearance for documentaries?

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-470
Author(s):  
Oğulcan Ekiz
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Documentary Film ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Level ◽  
Policy Perspective ◽  
Copyright Policy ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Copyright Clearance ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Limitations And Exceptions

The starting point of this article is a short documentary film that I and five colleagues produced in the course of the Business of Film module at Queen Mary University of London's Intellectual Property Law LLM Programme. During the process of production, we faced some borderline issues regarding our unauthorized uses of others’ copyright works. When we put ourselves into the copyright's author's shoes, three problems arose regarding our use of possible limitations and exceptions: the lack of guidance; the fear of liability; and the unharmonized status of limitations and exceptions at an international level. This article examines these problems from a copyright policy perspective and invites documentary festivals to undertake a mission of guiding new documentary directors through the complex, unharmonized world of copyright limitations and exceptions.

scholarly journals Of PhDs, Pirates, and the Public

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 811-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas S. Osborn
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Intimate Contact ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
3D Printers

The confluence of three-dimensional printing, three-dimensional scanning, and the Internet will erode the dividing line between the physical and the digital worlds and will bring millions of laypeople into intimate contact with the full spectrum of intellectual property laws. One of the areas most affected by 3D printers will be three-dimensional art. This Article analyzes several ways in which 3D printing technology will affect the creation, delivery, and consumption of art. Not only does 3D printing offer great promise for creative works, but it also presents a problem of piracy that may accompany the digitization of three-dimensional works. As 3D printing technology’s relationship to intellectual property law is largely unexplored, this Article explores foundational issues regarding how copyright law applies to 3D printing technology, laying the groundwork upon which further analysis of 3D printing’s effects on copyright law may be built.

scholarly journals Bioprinting and culture of tissues and organs in the BRICS countries (on the example of Brazil, India, China, and South Africa): approaches of legislation on intellectual property

2020 ◽  
pp. 35-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenia Michailovna Belikova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Medical Technologies ◽  
Brics Countries ◽  
The Right

This article examines the legal regulation of bioprinting (3D printing) and culture of tissues and organs in the BRICS countries through the prism of protection of intellectual property. The work demonstrates the means of protection of results acquired at each stage of bioprinting by the norms of copyright and patent law, as well as touches on the questions of the need (possibility) for patenting of “bioprinters”, “bioinks”, “biopapers”, etc. The goal of this research is to determine the necessary and possible boundaries for patenting (copyright law protection) of the means, products, processes and their moral-ethical acceptance in the society. The novelty of this work consists in a comprehensive analysis of the approaches of BRICS countries towards development, legal formalization and protection of bioprinting and culture of tissues and organs as medical and non-medical technologies from the perspective of intellectual property law. The author attempts to answer the question of (non)patentability of the process (means) and result (product) of bioprinting of tissues and organs, the “bioprinters” themselves, as well as the “bioinks” and “biopapers” they use. With regards to (non)patentability of tissues and organs acquired through 3D printing, a conclusion is made that there is an unfavorable environment for their patenting, though their production, in the author’s opinion, should the right to patenting providing that they meet the criteria (other conditions) set by patenting law of a particular country.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: The Issues of the Legal Regulation of Patent Relations

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Kupchina
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Introduction: in the paper, the author analyzed the current problems associated with the use of artificial intelligence in the field of intellectual property. Thanks to the active introduction of this technology in many areas of human activity, there is a rapid growth of innovative processes. On the one hand, such active improvement of the computer technology system creates a favorable environment for the development of economic, political and social relations. On the other hand, however, the potential for the further development of artificial intelligence is of serious concern in the scientific community. In particular, modern digital technologies are developing much faster than the legal framework designed to regulate them is improving. In this regard, the first branch of law that has faced the greatest difficulties is intellectual property law, since it is a branch of law directly related to innovation processes. The purpose of the research is achieved by solving a number of tasks: to determine the role of artificial intelligence as a “subject” of patent relations, as well as the boundaries of responsibility for patent infringement by AI. The methodology is based on a theoretical approach to the study of the legal framework in the field of intellectual property. Based on the analysis of the theoretical data obtained, the author provides the examples of patent violations related to the use of artificial intelligence technology, as well as highlights some modern approaches to solving this problem. The results of the research can be used to determine the key goals and objectives in the law enforcement, research, as well as in educational and teaching activities, in particular, during lectures and seminars on courses in intellectual property law, copyright and patent law. Conclusions: the development of artificial intelligence technologies is central to the development of better intellectual property management systems. The development of new doctrines for new technologies, the modification of the existing patent system, as well as the changes in the policy of intellectual property rights protection contribute to the effective development of innovative processes and the improvement of the legal system as a whole.

The Emergence and Development of United States Intellectual Property Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Bracha
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The United States ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Further Development

This chapter surveys the history of intellectual property law in the United States from its colonial origins to the present, and focuses on the three subfields that have a claim for seniority in terms of their longevity and importance: patent, copyright, and trademark. The development of these subfields is described as a process in which law has interacted with technology, economic factors, ideology, and politics. The chapter describes how at the end of the eighteenth-century American patent and copyright law emerged out of two sources: British laws and institutions and local colonial practices. The further development of American intellectual property law is analysed as comprising three stages: early patent, copyright, and trademark law; the consolidation of the modern framework of these fields through significant transformations beginning in the second half of the nineteenth century; and the various developments from the early twentieth century to the present.

Australian Intellectual Property Law

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Davison ◽  
Ann L. Monotti ◽  
Leanne Wiseman
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document