scholarly journals Differential Diagnosis for Female Pelvic Masses

Author(s):  
Francesco Alessandrino ◽  
Carolina Dellafiore ◽  
Esmeralda Eshja ◽  
Francesco Alfano ◽  
Giorgia Ricci ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Gainty ◽  
Christina Jones

Pelvic masses can pose a diagnostic dilemma with a broad differential to include both gynecological and non-gynecologic etiologies. While the initial instinct may be to search for gynecologic causes for the female patient, non-gynecologic etiologies must be considered as well. The presentation can be similar amongst many different causes of pelvic masses and imaging is generally required for further assessment to determine if the mass is intra- or extraperitoneal. The etiology of adnexal masses covers several subspecialties: gynecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurology, and oncology. For this reason, it is important for all to be aware of the differential diagnosis for pelvic masses.


Author(s):  
Tugrul Aydogdu ◽  
Tayfun Gungor ◽  
Mengu Tug ◽  
Sabri Cavkaytar

Author(s):  
Adnan Budak ◽  
Aykut Özcan ◽  
Tuğba Karadeniz ◽  
Ramazan Güven ◽  
Muzaffer Sancı

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 614-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIAHE TIAN ◽  
JINMING ZHANG ◽  
LUXIA JIAO ◽  
YALI LI ◽  
LIMIN CAO

1978 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
AC Fleischer ◽  
AE James ◽  
JB Millis ◽  
C Julian

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyman Varedi ◽  
Seyed Reza Saadat Mostafavi ◽  
Rambod Salouti ◽  
Daryoush Saedi ◽  
Seyed Ali Nabavizadeh ◽  
...  

We report and discuss a case of primary hydatidosis of the pelvic cavity in a woman who presented with severe weight loss and abdominal pain. This unusual presentation was initially considered as a tumor process until surgical exploration and microscopic studies confirmed the diagnosis. The gynecologists should be aware of possibility of primary hydatid cyst of the pelvic cavity and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic pelvic masses, especially in areas where the disease is endemic.


1994 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Romero ◽  
E.Edmund Kim ◽  
Andrzej P. Kudelka ◽  
Creighton L. Edwards ◽  
John J. Kavanagh

1980 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier F. Magrina ◽  
Richard E. Symmonds ◽  
David C. Dahlin

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Wang ◽  
Danrong Li ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Bujian Tang ◽  
Qingdi Quentin Li ◽  
...  

A lack of sensitive and specific tumor markers for early diagnosis and treatment is a major cause for the high mortality rate of ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify potential proteomics-based biomarkers useful for the differential diagnosis between ovarian cancer and benign pelvic masses. Serum samples from 41 patients with ovarian cancer, 32 patients with benign pelvic masses, and 41 healthy female blood donors were examined, and proteomic profiling of the samples was assessed by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy (MS). A confirmatory study was also conducted with serum specimens from 58 patients with ovarian carcinoma, 37 patients with benign pelvic masses, and 48 healthy women. A classification tree was established using Biomarker Pattern Software. Six differentially expressed proteins (APP, CA 125, CCL18, CXCL1, IL-8, and ITIH4) were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS/MS and database searches. Two of the proteins overexpressed in ovarian cancer patients, chemokine CC2 motif ligand 18 (CCL18) and chemokine CXC motif ligand 1 (CXCL1), were automatically selected in a multivariate predictive model. These two protein biomarkers were then validated and evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 535 serum specimens (130 ovarian cancer, 64 benign ovarian masses, 36 lung cancer, 60 gastric cancer, 55 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 48 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 142 healthy women). The combined use of CCL18 and CXCL1 as biomarkers for ovarian cancer had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 97%. The multivariate ELISA analysis of the two putative markers in combination with CA 125 resulted in a sensitivity of 99% for healthy women and 94% for benign pelvic masses, and a specificity of 92% for both groups; these values were significantly higher than those obtained with CA 125 alone (P<0.05). We conclude that serum CCL18 and CXCL1 are potentially useful as novel circulating tumor markers for the differential diagnosis between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian masses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document