scholarly journals Operative Hemostasis in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery: The Role of Biosurgical Agents

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Dammann ◽  
Amanda Gifford ◽  
Kathryn Kelley ◽  
Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) constitutes the foundation of emergency surgical services in the United States. Blunt and penetrating traumatic injuries are a leading cause of death worldwide. Non-trauma general surgical emergencies are also a major source of morbidity and mortality. Operative interventions performed within the scope of TACS often revolve around the core principles of contamination control, hemostasis, surgical repair, and subsequent functional restoration. Hemorrhage control is an integral part of emergent operative interventions, and while most instances of surgical bleeding require direct suture ligation or some other form of direct tissue intervention, some circumstances call for the use of adjunctive means of hemostasis. This is especially applicable to situations and settings where direct applications of surgical energy, suture ligation, or direct compression are not possible. Difficult-to-control bleeding can be highly lethal and operative control can be very challenging when confounded by the lethal triad of acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia. Topical biosurgical materials (BSM) are of great value in such scenarios, and their use across a variety of settings, from pre-hospital trauma application to emergency general surgery operations, represents an important adjunct to improve patient outcomes. Here we present the different BSMs, discuss their various uses, and provide insight on future applications and developments in this important area.

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Knowlton ◽  
Joseph Minei ◽  
Lakshika Tennakoon ◽  
Kimberly A. Davis ◽  
Jay Doucet ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Nitin Mishra ◽  
Patricia L. Roberts ◽  
Peter W. Marcello ◽  
Thomas E. Read ◽  
Jason F. Hall ◽  
...  

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.


2015 ◽  
Vol 220 (4) ◽  
pp. 762-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayur Narayan ◽  
Ronald Tesoriero ◽  
Brandon R. Bruns ◽  
Elena N. Klyushnenkova ◽  
Hegang Chen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bernard ◽  
Kristan Staudenmayer ◽  
Joseph P Minei ◽  
Jay Doucet ◽  
Adil Haider ◽  
...  

Acute care surgery (ACS) diagnoses are responsible for approximately a quarter of the costs of inpatient care in the US government, and individuals will be responsible for a larger share of the costs of this healthcare as the population ages. ACS as a specialty thus has the opportunity to meet a significant healthcare need, and by optimizing care delivery models do so in a way that improves both quality and value. ACS practice models that have maintained or added emergency general surgery (EGS) and even elective surgery have realized more operative case volume and surgeon satisfaction. However, vulnerabilities exist in the ACS model. Payer mix in a practice varies by geography and distribution of EGS, trauma, critical care, and elective surgery. Critical care codes constitute approximately 25% of all billing by acute care surgeons, so even small changes in reimbursement in critical care can have significant impact on professional revenue. Staffing an ACS practice can be challenging depending on reimbursement and due to uneven geographic distribution of available surgeons. Empowered by an understanding of economics, using team-oriented leadership inherent to trauma surgeons, and in partnership with healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies, ACS surgeons are positioned to significantly influence the future of healthcare in the USA.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2660-2667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heena P. Santry ◽  
Sumbal Janjua ◽  
Yuchiao Chang ◽  
Laurie Petrovick ◽  
George C. Velmahos

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Robert Bruns ◽  
Ronald B. Tesoriero ◽  
Mayur Narayan ◽  
Lindsay OʼMeara ◽  
Margaret H. Lauerman ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. e143-e147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Alan Cook ◽  
Lauren Tollack ◽  
Shahid Shafi ◽  
Heidi Frankel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document