scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Latest Advances

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros Giakoustidis ◽  
Apostolos Koffas ◽  
Dimitrios Giakoustidis ◽  
Vasileios N. Papadopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
And Training ◽  
Selection Of Patients ◽  
Selection Of

Surgical resection is the gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma management for early stages of the disease. With advances in technology and techniques, minimally invasive surgery provides a great number of advantages for these patients during their surgery and for their post-operative care. The selection of patients following a multi-disciplinary approach is of paramount importance. Adding to this, the developments in laparoscopic instruments and training, as well as the promising advantages of robotic surgery along with other forms of technology, increase the pool of patients that can undergo operation safely and with good results worldwide. We review results from great centres worldwide and delineate the accurate multi-disciplinary approach for this.

Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 2323-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila R. Armijo ◽  
Chun-Kai Huang ◽  
Robin High ◽  
Melissa Leon ◽  
Ka-Chun Siu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Single Port Laparoscopy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.

Development and selection of Asian-specific humeral implants based on statistical atlas: toward planning minimally invasive surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1333-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wu ◽  
Z. J. Daruwalla ◽  
K. L. Wong ◽  
D. Murphy ◽  
H. Ren
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Statistical Atlas ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 661-664
Author(s):  
Aroj Bhattarai ◽  
Manfred Staat
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Numerical Simulations ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Apical Prolapse ◽  
Product Models ◽  
Different Shapes ◽  
Computational Comparison ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractProsthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh®-PRS soft, DynaMesh®-PRP soft and DynaMesh®-CESA from FEG Textiletechnik mbH, Germany are compared.

scholarly journals Successful Adoption of Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) in Robotic Surgery: A Multi-Institutional North American Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S47
Author(s):  
Shanglei Liu ◽  
Bryce W. Murry ◽  
Lisa Parry ◽  
Craig S. Johnson ◽  
Santiago Horgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
North American ◽  
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
American Experience

Robotic colorectal surgery: Where are we right now?

2010 ◽  
Vol 224 (7) ◽  
pp. 1415-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kang ◽  
K Y Lee
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Colorectal Disease ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery has become mainstream in surgical management of colorectal disease. Based on evidence of oncologic safety and benefit to patients, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is regarded as a successful alternative to open surgery. Since the introduction of the da Vinci® system as another tool for minimally invasive surgery, there have been several reports regarding the feasibility and safety of the system. The authors looked at their experience with 412 robotic colorectal surgeries and found that it was feasible and safe. Incidence of operation-related morbidity was around 11 per cent and system-related problems were 2.4 per cent. There was no operation-related or system-related mortality. From a technological perspective, robotic surgery has several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including a magnifying view with a three-dimensional image, a stable camera platform, and instruments with Endowrist® technology that allow for seven degrees of freedom of movement. However, there is still room for improvement. The revolution of robotic technology can aid in the realization of a dream: a smaller, cheaper, and more sophisticated robotic system, which will further facilitate the widespread application of robotic surgery to colorectal disease.

ROBOTIC SURGERY INCREASES PATIENTʼs ACCESS TO MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR HYSTERECTOMIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
G. Forde ◽  
J. Chang ◽  
Z. A ◽  
K. Tewari ◽  
R. Bristow
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Advances in minimally invasive surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cun-Zhen Zhang ◽  
Nan Li
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document