scholarly journals Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Over 50 Years Old? Yes, or No

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Mardani-Kivi ◽  
Zoleikha Azari ◽  
Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili ◽  
Ardeshir Shirangi ◽  
Zahra Haghparast Ghadim Limudahi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Satisfaction Rate ◽  
Exercise Activity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) in people aged more than 50 and under 30 years of age. Methods: A total of 64 patients with ACL rupture were evaluated for eligibility. Thirty-two patients with ACL rupture, aged more than 50 years (54.38 ± 1.26) were matched in all of the background factors, with 32 patients suffering from ACL rupture under 30 years old. They were followed for clinical and functional results at six and on average 45.58 months after surgery. These evaluations included the Lachman test, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm knee score (LKS), return to exercise activity, post-operative satisfaction rate, and pain intensity based on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and rates of extension and flexion loss. Results: Our findings indicated that knee stability, return to exercise activity, LKS and IKDC scores, as well as pain intensity and satisfaction were significantly improved in both groups. Indeed, the satisfaction rate of patients over 50 years at six months after surgery was less than those under 30 years (P < 0.001); however, it was approximately similar to the group under 30 years of age in the final follow-up (P > 0.05). The rate of return to sports activity was also lower in patients over 50 years. Conclusions: The comparable results at the patients with < 30 years demonstrated that arthroscopic ACL-R in patients over 50 years of age with no or mild DJD has good results.

scholarly journals Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Patterns: A Survey of the PRiSM Society

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711983904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot M. Greenberg ◽  
Eric T. Greenberg ◽  
Jeffrey Albaugh ◽  
Eileen Storey ◽  
Theodore J. Ganley
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Functional Testing ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) requires extensive postoperative rehabilitation. Although no ideal rehabilitation procedure exists, most experts recommend a fusion of time and strength and functional measures to guide decision making for activity progression during rehabilitation. This process is often directed by surgeon protocols; however, the adoption of contemporary rehabilitation recommendations among surgeons is unknown. Purpose: To understand the current landscape of surgeon practice as it relates to ACLR rehabilitation recommendations in adolescent athletes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online survey was distributed among members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society in January 2017. The survey was designed to identify clinical practice patterns during 3 key transitional points of rehabilitation after ACLR: progression to jogging, modified sports activity, and unrestricted return to sports. Results: Responses from 60 orthopaedic surgeons were analyzed. While 80% of surgeons agreed upon initiating jogging within a 1-month range (3-4 months postoperatively), similar levels of agreement were only captured when including a wider 4-month (4-8 months) and 6-month range (6-12 months) for modified sports activity and unrestricted return to sports, respectively. All respondents (100%) reported using knee strength as a determinant to progress to modified sports activity; however, the mode of testing varied, with most using manual muscle testing (60%), followed by isokinetic (28%) or isometric (12%) testing. Most surgeons (68%) reported using some form of functional testing to return to modified sports activity, but the mode of testing and required progression criteria varied considerably among all reported testing procedures. The use of patient-reported outcome measures was limited to 20% of the sample, and no respondents reported using fear or self-efficacy questionnaires. Upon completion of rehabilitation, 73% recommended injury prevention programs, and 50% recommended the use of a functional ACL brace. Conclusion: Rehabilitation progression practices in adolescent athletes are variable and become more inconsistent as the time from surgery increases. While the majority of the sample considered strength and functional testing important, the mode of testing and criteria thresholds for activity advancement varied considerably.

scholarly journals Functional results of surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee joint in combination with lateral stabilization

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Zayats ◽  
A. K. Dulaev ◽  
N. V. Zagorodnii ◽  
A. V. Dydykin ◽  
I. N. Ulianchenko
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bone Autograft

Theobjectivewas to compare the effectiveness of isolated anatomical antegrade reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with bonetendon-bone autograft (BTB autograft) and in combination with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) graft from the iliotibial tract (ITT).Material and methods. We analyzed 187 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions in patients with a Pivot shift test – 3+ degree. We performed an isolated ACL-R in 118 (63.1 %) patients in group 1 and added the LEAT from ITB to it in group 2.Results. According to IKDC-2000: 176 (94.1 %) patients were included in categories A and B, 11 (5.9 %) – in C. Significant differences in these groups appeared 15 months after the operation. According to KOSS: in group 2, the anterior and rotational knee stability, as well as the level of sports activity were higher, and pathological symptoms were less common.Conclusion. LEAT from ITB increases stability and functionality of the knee joint in patients with anatomical antegrade ACL reconstructions with BTB-autograft for terms over 15 months after the operation, and is an economically procedure.

scholarly journals Remnant preservation provides good clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Huang ◽  
Masashi Nagao ◽  
Hirofumi Nishio ◽  
Haruka Kaneko ◽  
Yoshitomo Saita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Satisfaction Rate ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the association of remnant preservation (RP) and non-RP (NRP) with patient-reported outcome measures and subsequent graft rupture at a minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Patients in this retrospective study underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction by the RP or NRP technique with a four- to five-strand hamstring tendon graft. Multivariate linear or logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare the physical and psychological outcomes by the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form (IKDC-SKF) and the Japanese Anterior Cruciate Ligament questionnaire 25 (JACL-25), respectively; satisfaction rate; and prognosticators of graft rupture. Results In total, 120 patients (mean age, 30.6 ± 12.7 years; 54 RP, 66 NRP) with a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.6 years were enrolled in this study. At the latest postoperative follow-up, the RP group showed a mean IKDC-SKF score of 92.3 ± 8.5 and mean JACL-25 score of 13.2 ± 11.2, while these scores in the NRP group were 86.4 ± 12.2 and 24.4 ± 19.5, respectively (P = 0.016 and 0.007, respectively). No significant differences were found in the return-to-sports rate (RP vs. NRP, 79.5% vs. 67.5%) or satisfaction rate (RP vs. NRP, 89.2% vs. 74.4%) (n.s.); however, a significant difference was found in the rate of return to the preinjury sports level (RP vs. NRP, 64.1% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.014). The graft rupture rate was significantly higher in the NRP than RP group (9/66 vs. 1/54; hazard ratio 9.29; 95% confidence interval 1.04–82.81). Younger age (≤ 18 years) was the other important risk factor for graft rupture (hazard ratio 8.67; 95% confidence interval 2.02–37.13). Conclusion Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with the RP technique obtained somewhat better physical and psychological results than those who underwent ACL reconstruction with the NRP technique. With respect to clinical relevance, patients treated with the RP technique may obtain better outcomes in terms of graft rupture and return to the preinjury sports level than those treated with the NRP technique, but with no differences in overall return to sports or satisfaction. Level of evidence IV.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Associated with Cardiomyopathy in Three Cats

1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 35-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. O. Janssens ◽  
D. L. Janssens ◽  
L. A. A. Janssens
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Thoracic Radiography ◽  
Ligament Rupture ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Rupture ◽  
Previous Trauma ◽  
History Of ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

SummaryOver a period of 14 years, three cats with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were seen in our practice. In all, the rupture had occurred without a history of previous trauma. All were treated surgically. All died within a period of 14 days. The reason of death was in all cases cardiomyopathy. We now suggest that cats with rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament undergo an electrocardiographic recording and eventually an thoracic radiography before surgery is considered. We also suggest that cats with ACL rupture should preferably be treated conservatively.

The Femoral Footprint Position of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Might Be a Predisposing Factor to a Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3365-3372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitris Dimitriou ◽  
Zhongzheng Wang ◽  
Diyang Zou ◽  
Tsung-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Naeder Helmy
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Transverse Plane ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Although the femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the recommendations for the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on cadaveric studies with small sample sizes, elderly patients with unknown ACL status, and 2-dimensional techniques. Furthermore, a potential difference in the femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation between ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact knees has not been reported in the literature. Hypothesis: The femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation vary significantly between ACL-ruptured and matched control ACL-intact knees. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Magnetic resonance images of the knees of 90 patients with an ACL rupture and 90 matched control participants who had a noncontact knee injury without an ACL rupture were used to create 3-dimensional models of the femur and tibia. The ACL footprints were outlined on each model, and their positions (normalized to the lateral condyle width) as well as ACL orientations were measured with an anatomic coordinate system. Results: The femoral ACL footprint in patients with an ACL rupture was located at 36.6% posterior and 11.2% distal to the flexion-extension axis (FEA). The ACL orientation was 46.9° in the sagittal plane, 70.3° in the coronal plane, and 20.8° in the transverse plane. The ACL-ruptured group demonstrated a femoral ACL footprint position that was 11.0% more posterior and 7.7% more proximal than that of the control group (all P < .01). The same patients also exhibited 5.7° lower sagittal elevation, 3.1° higher coronal plane elevation, and 7.9° lower transverse plane deviation (all P < .01). The optimal cutoff value of the femoral ACL footprint position to prevent an ACL rupture was at 30% posterior and 12% distal to the FEA. Conclusion: The ACL femoral footprint position might be a predisposing factor to an ACL rupture. Patients with a >30% posterior and <12% distal position of the femoral ACL footprint from the FEA might have a 51.2-times increased risk of an ACL rupture.

scholarly journals No Association Between Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Selected Candidate Collagen Gene Variants in Female Elite Athletes From High-Risk Team Sports

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Einar Andreas Sivertsen ◽  
Kari Bente Foss Haug ◽  
Eirik Klami Kristianslund ◽  
Anne-Marie Siebke Trøseid ◽  
Jari Parkkari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Elite Athletes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Team Sports ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Several single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in collagen genes have been reported as predisposing factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. However, the evidence is conflicting and does not support a clear association between genetic variants and risk of ACL ruptures. Purpose: To assess the association of previously identified candidate SNVs in genes encoding for collagen and the risk of ACL injury in a population of elite female athletes from high-risk team sports. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 851 female Norwegian and Finnish elite athletes from team sports were included from 2007 to 2011. ACL injuries acquired before inclusion in the cohort were registered by interview. The participants were followed prospectively through 2015 to record new complete ACL injuries. Six selected SNVs were genotyped ( COL1A1: rs1800012, rs1107946; COL3A1: rs1800255; COL5A1: rs12722, rs13946; COL12A1: rs970547). Results: No associations were found between ACL rupture and the SNVs tested. Conclusion: The study does not support a role of the 6 selected SNVs in genes encoding for collagen proteins as risk factors for ACL injury. Clinical Relevance: Genetic profiling to identify athletes at high risk for ACL rupture is not yet feasible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document