scholarly journals Correlation between the result from arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee and the return to sports activity

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Almeida ◽  
Márcio Rangel Valin ◽  
Ramon Ferreira ◽  
Nayvaldo Couto de Almeida ◽  
Ana Paula Agostini
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711983904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot M. Greenberg ◽  
Eric T. Greenberg ◽  
Jeffrey Albaugh ◽  
Eileen Storey ◽  
Theodore J. Ganley

Background: Recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) requires extensive postoperative rehabilitation. Although no ideal rehabilitation procedure exists, most experts recommend a fusion of time and strength and functional measures to guide decision making for activity progression during rehabilitation. This process is often directed by surgeon protocols; however, the adoption of contemporary rehabilitation recommendations among surgeons is unknown. Purpose: To understand the current landscape of surgeon practice as it relates to ACLR rehabilitation recommendations in adolescent athletes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online survey was distributed among members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society in January 2017. The survey was designed to identify clinical practice patterns during 3 key transitional points of rehabilitation after ACLR: progression to jogging, modified sports activity, and unrestricted return to sports. Results: Responses from 60 orthopaedic surgeons were analyzed. While 80% of surgeons agreed upon initiating jogging within a 1-month range (3-4 months postoperatively), similar levels of agreement were only captured when including a wider 4-month (4-8 months) and 6-month range (6-12 months) for modified sports activity and unrestricted return to sports, respectively. All respondents (100%) reported using knee strength as a determinant to progress to modified sports activity; however, the mode of testing varied, with most using manual muscle testing (60%), followed by isokinetic (28%) or isometric (12%) testing. Most surgeons (68%) reported using some form of functional testing to return to modified sports activity, but the mode of testing and required progression criteria varied considerably among all reported testing procedures. The use of patient-reported outcome measures was limited to 20% of the sample, and no respondents reported using fear or self-efficacy questionnaires. Upon completion of rehabilitation, 73% recommended injury prevention programs, and 50% recommended the use of a functional ACL brace. Conclusion: Rehabilitation progression practices in adolescent athletes are variable and become more inconsistent as the time from surgery increases. While the majority of the sample considered strength and functional testing important, the mode of testing and criteria thresholds for activity advancement varied considerably.


2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Mardani-Kivi ◽  
Zoleikha Azari ◽  
Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili ◽  
Ardeshir Shirangi ◽  
Zahra Haghparast Ghadim Limudahi

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) in people aged more than 50 and under 30 years of age. Methods: A total of 64 patients with ACL rupture were evaluated for eligibility. Thirty-two patients with ACL rupture, aged more than 50 years (54.38 ± 1.26) were matched in all of the background factors, with 32 patients suffering from ACL rupture under 30 years old. They were followed for clinical and functional results at six and on average 45.58 months after surgery. These evaluations included the Lachman test, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm knee score (LKS), return to exercise activity, post-operative satisfaction rate, and pain intensity based on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and rates of extension and flexion loss. Results: Our findings indicated that knee stability, return to exercise activity, LKS and IKDC scores, as well as pain intensity and satisfaction were significantly improved in both groups. Indeed, the satisfaction rate of patients over 50 years at six months after surgery was less than those under 30 years (P < 0.001); however, it was approximately similar to the group under 30 years of age in the final follow-up (P > 0.05). The rate of return to sports activity was also lower in patients over 50 years. Conclusions: The comparable results at the patients with < 30 years demonstrated that arthroscopic ACL-R in patients over 50 years of age with no or mild DJD has good results.


2000 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-770
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Hanada ◽  
Michiya Hara ◽  
Keihan Cho ◽  
Gen Emoto ◽  
Takeshi Kanemiya ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Prof. Shehzad Javed ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Farrukh Bashir ◽  
Dr. Zubair Khalid ◽  
Dr. Umair Ahmed ◽  
Prof Amer Aziz

Introduction: There are two techniques for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), open technique and arthroscopic assisted technique. Arthroscopic assisted technique has many advantages over open procedure but it needs more expertise and cost comparatively.The objective of this study is to identify the clinical outcomes on basis of lyshlomknee score (LKS) system and find out patients satisfaction after performing both procedures in two groups separately. Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 600 patients undergoing open ACL reconstruction and arthroscopic reconstruction from 2005 to 2018 was done, at the Department of Orthopaedics, Ghurki Hospital, Lahore. We included all those patients who were 18 to 45 years of age and had at least 1 year follow up.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evans Y. K. Ashigbi ◽  
Florian Giesche ◽  
Winfried Banzer ◽  
David A. Groneberg ◽  
Daniel Niederer

Abstract BackgroundIn team-sports such as football or basketball, athletes need to rapidly adapt their motor plans and actions to unanticipated changes in the environment. Unanticipated jump-landing tasks have been found to elevate the risk of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries compared to an anticipated condition. ACL-reconstructed individuals may have greater difficulties to maintain neuromuscular control under unanticipated conditions exposing them to a higher reinjury risk during the game. The planned trial aims to investigate the acute effects of a team-sport specific injury prevention programme on potential ACL reinjury risk factors under anticipated and unanticipated jump-landings.Methods and design:Single center randomized controlled crossover trial. Female and male ACL-reconstructed participants cleared for return to sports (≥ 6 months and ≤ 24 months post-reconstruction) will be included. In a randomized sequence and with a washout phase of one week in between, the participants will perform an injury preventive warm-up protocol (PEP; strengthening, flexibility, plyometry and agility) and a standard warm-up program (bicycle ergometer). Both interventions will last for 12 minutes and will be conducted at moderate intensity (BORG scale: 12 to 14). After each warm-up, participants will perform counter movement jumps with single-leg landings on a force plate. Prior to the jump, a left or right footprint (equally distributed) will be indicated on a screen. Under the anticipated condition, the participants will be informed before the jump that the displayed footprint will not change after take-off. Under the unanticipated condition, the participants will not know whether the target landing side will remain the same (consistent with pre-movement expectations) or change (inconsistent). Under both unanticipated conditions, this information will be displayed 0.1 second after take-off and thus approximately 0.3 seconds before landing.Parametric/non-parametric crossover-analyses (carryover-tests and crossover test) for between-conditions comparisons will be applied. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, identification number DRKS00016942. Registered on May 24, 2019.


2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712110665
Author(s):  
Msaad Alzhrani ◽  
Hosam Alzahrani ◽  
Yasir S. Alshehri

Background: The short version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale is a self-reported questionnaire developed to assess the psychological readiness of patients to return to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the short version of the ACL-RSI scale into the Arabic language (ACL-RSI-Ar). Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The original short version of the ACL-RSI scale was forward and backward translated, cross-culturally adapted, and validated following international standardized guidelines. Sixty patients who participated in sports activities and underwent ACLR completed the ACL-RSI-Ar, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scales. To assess test-retest reliability, 34 participants completed the ACL-RSI-Ar scale twice. Statistical tests were conducted to test the internal consistency, reliability, and construct and discriminant validity of the ACL-RSI-Ar scale. Results: The ACL-RSI-Ar showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.734) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.871). The ACL-RSI-Ar was strongly correlated with the IKDC (Spearman ρ = 0.515, P < .001) and weakly to strongly correlated with all KOOS subscales (Spearman ρ = 0.247-0.590, P < .05). Patients who returned to sports had significantly higher scores on the ACL-RSI-Ar scale when compared with those who did not return to sports ( P = .001). Conclusion: The short ACL-RSI-Ar scale, as translated, was internally consistent, reliable, and valid for evaluating psychological readiness to return to sports after ACLR in Arabic-speaking patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document